Perhaps they will be sworn in, but the fraud is to be laid directly at Barry’s feet. It was his website which first posted a jpg image of a CoLB which lacked a raised seal. When that was called to their attention, they placed a raised seal on the first image and claimed that was then genuine. There is an artifact in the image of the first exhibit which shows up in the second exhibit with the raised seal, but not in the third exhibit claimed by factcheck to be the ‘handled’ CoLB. Of course, factcheck vouched for the first and second exhibits also, so they are about as honest as the sleaziest used car salesman you could imagine.
Nice try, but no ceegar. There was no raised seal on the backside of the exhibit first posted at fightthesmears. It was added to the first image they tried to float, then re-exhibited. If there had been a raised seal on the backside where the supposed date was bleeding through to the front side, the green hatchmarks on the front side of the image would have been distorted as they were in the secxond image... and they are in the second image the liars posted at fight the smears along with an artifact that shows up in both one and two, which will be brought out in court if it ever gets that far. But that was a nice try to confuse and mislead the forum.