Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385

What about the state laws requiring auto insurance? Not that I agree with those either. We even have to buy coverage in case we’re hit by an illegal driving without a licence or insurance themselves.


7 posted on 11/06/2009 10:20:38 AM PST by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jackson57

The state laws regarding auto insurance...only apply to those individuals that own and drive their cars. There is no state law that forces EVERYONE to buy auto insurance.

That is the difference. This bill MANDATES everyone to buy Health Insurance...regardless of your age, health, income, etc. No exceptions.

That is the difference.


12 posted on 11/06/2009 10:26:02 AM PST by Herodes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jackson57

You’re not required to buy coverage for yourself - you’re required to buy coverage in case you hit someone else.

And those are fundamentally different, insofar as you don’t have to drive to live.


14 posted on 11/06/2009 10:26:15 AM PST by furquhart (Would it not be easier to dissolve the people and elect another?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jackson57
What about the state laws requiring auto insurance? Not that I agree with those either. We even have to buy coverage in case we’re hit by an illegal driving without a licence or insurance themselves.

The presumption of those laws is that you are driving on government owned roads thus government can make rules on your prerequisites for using them. If you just want to drive around private property you should need neither a license nor insurance. However the government may have exceeded those limitations in some cases.

16 posted on 11/06/2009 10:28:10 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Any similarity between V and the Obama admin is just that of Obama and any other totalitarian regime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jackson57

Yes, we must buy auto insurance, but it’s for the other guy
in the accident.
I, however, am not required to buy collision insurance for my car.


20 posted on 11/06/2009 10:33:26 AM PST by gigster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jackson57

If you don’t want to drive...you don’t have to. I know lots of Mennonites in Tennessee who don’t drive but ride a buggy....you don’t see mandatory buggy insurance required....now do you?

This is just one legal challenge of hundreds. Even if passed....2013 can come and the Supreme Court will have various cases to stall it for two or three years until this is settled.


21 posted on 11/06/2009 10:35:25 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jackson57

They only mandate it if you wish to drive your car on the road. There is no penalty not to have insurance if you do not go on the road. Also, you are not required to cover yourself or your car. You must have coverage to cover others (in your car) or other peoples property and person if you cause an accident.

Not mandatory! I really hate that this car insurance stuff keeps coming up. And states are allowed to do this, government is not. Rhode Island drivers are not required to have insurance.


27 posted on 11/06/2009 10:53:09 AM PST by jcsjcm (American Patriot - follow the Constitution and in God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jackson57

“What about the state laws requiring auto insurance?”

1. State government vs. fed government.
2. No car, no requirement.
3. Requirement is for liability ins not for car care.


28 posted on 11/06/2009 10:56:11 AM PST by CSM (Business is too big too fail... Government is too big to succeed... I am too small to matter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson