Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cap and Trade Changing Everything
Lovington Leader ^ | 10/14/09 | John Graham

Posted on 12/05/2009 9:24:25 PM PST by greenwill

Cap and trade legislation may be one of the biggest issues facing the oil and gas industry according to Dr. Daniel Fine, Associate of Policy, Strategy and Development at New Mexico Tech. He also serves on the New Mexico Center for Energy Policy which is hosting the presentation by former Shell Oil executive, John Hofmeister tonight.

“What is the purpose to cap and trade?” asks Fine. “Is the purpose to raise revenue? Is the purpose to lower CO2? Or both?” The bill (Waxman-Markey) coming out of the U.S. House of Representatives claims both purposes without a clear policy declaration.

(Excerpt) Read more at nmcep.nmt.edu ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2009review; 2010; activism; bhohealthcare; bloggersandpersonal; capandtrade; carbontax; climate; climatechange; climatechangedata; climategate; climatetax; congress; copenhagen; corruption; danielfine; democrat; democrats; demotax; economy; elections; energy; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; government; johnhofmeister; msm; obama; politics; republican; senate; statesrights; taxes; taxocrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Cap and trade legislation may be one of the biggest issues facing the oil and gas industry according to Dr. Daniel Fine, Associate of Policy, Strategy and Development at New Mexico Tech. He also serves on the New Mexico Center for Energy Policy which is hosting the presentation by former Shell Oil executive, John Hofmeister tonight.

“What is the purpose to cap and trade?” asks Fine. “Is the purpose to raise revenue? Is the purpose to lower CO2? Or both?” The bill (Waxman-Markey) coming out of the U.S. House of Representatives claims both purposes without a clear policy declaration.

The bill is now in the hands of the U.S. Senate.

Fine says determining the price or cost for one metric ton of carbon dioxide is the biggest omission in the bill that needs to be addressed before moving forward.

“What is the trigger price which would affect an investment from the utilities and others to move towards low carbon technology? How much should CO2 cost before it triggers a corporate strategic decision to invest in technology which would lower the greenhouse gas emissions?” asks Fine.

Without the price per ton of CO2, nothing can be implemented.

The house version has been worked over in the Senate with many changes. Fine says in the House bill, only 2% of the allowances (or credits) have been awarded to the oil and gas industry as opposed to 37% to the utility industry. “The Senate is currently looking at that in terms of equity,” said Fine.

Also there is no reference in that bill in support of nuclear energy.

“Nuclear energy, in terns of cap and trade, is a central part of the issue because it is emissions free,” added Fine.

Recognition of that in terms of allowances and credits would put nuclear energy in the forefront of greenhouse gas emissions reduction.

It would also assist the nuclear energy industry in rewards to financing new reactors. They could capitalize the credits to assist the bottom line.

The omission of nuclear energy in the House should be subject to discussion and debate in the Senate, says Fine.

Fine thinks a cap and trade bill, in some form, will be out soon and will probably be a moderate or reasonable version of the House bill. It will be less costly, more reasonable and an adjusted timeline for the implementation of it.

Fine says the focus on cap and trade creates a “a potential to reexamine the oil and gas industry, particularly the gas production.”

“There is growing recognition that the discovery, exploration and production of new gas, particularly shale gas, has changed supply and demand and put natural gas in a surplus position in the United States. In that way, the gas producers would be qualified as a low carbon or lower carbon emissions source than coal. So I think there is a changing dynamic of recognition of the gas industry based on the new surplus expected from shale gas,” Fine added.

1 posted on 12/05/2009 9:24:30 PM PST by greenwill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: greenwill

I would dare to say that the average idiot out there has no clue how miserable their lives will be if this cap and trade legislation ever goes into effect.


2 posted on 12/05/2009 9:28:36 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
“What is the purpose to cap and trade?”

It is to enslave the working class American who will be severely burdened by the high cost of heating and energizing his/her home and commuting to work.

Little if any income will remain for family substenance, creating a very toxic (but necessary) relationship with government and the aforementioned industries.

Profits for the aforementioned utility, energy and fuel companies will skyrocket, enriching their management and government beyond comprehension.

3 posted on 12/05/2009 9:35:13 PM PST by MamaDearest (Remember to pray for our nation's preservation. America as we've always known it needs our prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greenwill

This legislation is an out and out catastrophe for our economy and way of life. These people are insane. You will see unemployment in double digits from now until kingdom come.


4 posted on 12/05/2009 9:41:02 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

>>“What is the purpose to cap and trade?”
>
>It is to enslave the working class American who will be severely burdened by the high cost of heating and energizing his/her home and commuting to work.

I may be a bit biased, but I’d rather just shoot the taxman and not pay this mandatory-tax/enslavement-bill.


5 posted on 12/05/2009 9:47:17 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Actually, you are wrong.
Most of the energy companies will be hammered by this.

Those TRADING in “carbon credits” might get rich, but the actual production of energy will get clobbered.


6 posted on 12/05/2009 10:06:23 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: greenwill
This is number two in what I call The Big 4: Health care, Cap and Trade, Amnesty for illegals and Gun Control. If they pass these, you can kiss America goodbye. . unless you won't stand for it and converge 200 million Patriots to Washington D.C.!
7 posted on 12/05/2009 10:13:57 PM PST by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Actually, you are wrong. Most of the energy companies will be hammered by this.

Some utilities would profit from cap and trade, while refiners would lose, report finds

Snips: Exelon, which owns a large fleet of nuclear generators, would actually make money from cap-and-trade, to the tune of $1.7 billion annually, the report says. The basis for the analysis is the Kerry-Boxer bill that will be marked up tomorrow by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

Another winner: New Jersey-based NRG, which owns gas, coal and nuclear plants in Texas. Point Carbon says cap-and-trade would be a net gain for NRG, because it would benefit from free pollution allowances to meet the "cap" in markets like Texas, where natural gas sets the price. NRG also owns power plants in eastern states where coal sets the price of power, and could recover its carbon costs through price increases in those markets. NRG has been one of the most vocal supporters of cap and trade, spending $1.4 million in 2008 to lobby Congress. Its chief executive, David Crane, has testified at numerous hearings to urge that Congress create such a system.

Now it's clear why many utilities support cap and trade, while oil companies oppose it.

Why free allocation of carbon allowances means windfall profits for energy companies at the expense of consumers

In other words, permit prices dictated the rise and fall of consumer prices, even when permits had been free for energy producers. And when an energy research group at the University of Cambridge looked at the European experience, they also agreed: ...in theory, power producers pass on the opportunity costs of freely allocated emission allowances to the price of electricity.

8 posted on 12/05/2009 10:18:25 PM PST by MamaDearest (Remember to pray for our nation's preservation. America as we've always known it needs our prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greenwill

Cap’n’trade law puts government in control of every business, every industry, every home, and every individual in America.

Carbon treaty puts an end to the notion of national sovereignty. It subjects the US to an international oligarchy.

We are debating the end of the republic. Pass this bill and it is our generation that buries the republic we inherited from better men than we.


9 posted on 12/05/2009 10:19:36 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
"I would dare to say that the average idiot out there has no clue how miserable their lives will be if this cap and trade legislation ever goes into effect."

And I will dare to say that the average leftist moron politican (ie DemocRAT) has no idea of how miserable their lives will be if they try to pass this bullcrap (yet another anti-capitalist, anti-American) legislation.

But as dense as they are, yet still, they will try to pass it. Let them reap as they have sown.

10 posted on 12/05/2009 10:34:58 PM PST by XenaLee (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greenwill
“What is the purpose to cap and trade?” asks Fine. “Is the purpose to raise revenue?"

You can stop right there. And add "global redistribution of American taxpayers' money".

11 posted on 12/05/2009 10:37:00 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
No, they won't. Most energy companies are international, nor are they restricted from trading in carbon credits, nor from investing in carbon free technologies.

Who will really get clobbered are Mr. and Ms. Taxpayer. That is the objective of Cap and Tax.

12 posted on 12/05/2009 10:47:57 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greenwill

Don’t let the MSM win this.

Show everybody you know (best ClimateGate clips):

http://www.BraveNewCommie.com


13 posted on 12/05/2009 11:32:36 PM PST by Islam=Murder (Hitler hated his Jewish side; Omoslem hates his white side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greenwill
socialism definition - business;

A political and economic system based on collective ownership of the means of production and distribution. Socialists claim that their system of government and worker ownership bases production on human needs rather than on the profit motive.

14 posted on 12/06/2009 12:50:28 AM PST by KTM rider ( ..........tell me this really isn't happening ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

what you say is insanity, bosworth should not go and that woman looks like a rabid dog when she smiles, i dont know how she got pregnant with them ugly kids


15 posted on 12/06/2009 1:13:40 AM PST by skipper18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greenwill

follow the money


16 posted on 12/06/2009 1:50:46 AM PST by element92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greenwill; DollyCali; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; Thunder90; Little Bill; Nervous Tick; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

17 posted on 12/06/2009 3:43:55 AM PST by steelyourfaith (Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Pass this bill and it is our generation that buries the republic we inherited from better men than we.

I just despise obama and the democrats for what they are doing to this country. The MSM is complicit. Do they think this won't affect them and their loved ones? I'm praying that if obamacare and this cap and trade obamanation pass, people will finally see the whole picture and we will overwhelmingly take back all three branches of government and reverse ALL of this crap by demand.

18 posted on 12/06/2009 4:08:27 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: greenwill; All
The answer to this is simple.

We can reduce CO2 emissions by about 50% in one day:

Abort all Democrats, regardless of how many trimesters old they are.

It's my right to choose.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

19 posted on 12/06/2009 4:36:26 AM PST by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties

Don’t fall for the populist crap.

Cap and trade is BAD for the energy business, at least as far as coal and oil and natural gas are concerned.


20 posted on 12/06/2009 7:37:33 AM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson