1 posted on
12/10/2009 12:53:44 PM PST by
TitansAFC
To: TitansAFC
Just one more game would help tremendously, the winners of Texas-Alabama goes against the winner of TCU-BSU.
2 posted on
12/10/2009 12:55:57 PM PST by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: TitansAFC
5 posted on
12/10/2009 1:06:59 PM PST by
TitansAFC
(Socialism is a disease; Sarah Palin is the cure. Palin/Romney 2012 or Palin/Gingrich 2012!!)
To: TitansAFC
Has to be one of the best thought-out and reasoned arguments made so far (that I am aware of). It makes TOO much sense for the NCAA dictatorship to accept. Seems that in the end, such an arrangement would actually mean MORE money to the schools and to the NCAA, would lend a massive amount of credibility to a system that almost can’t help but have a big “?” next to every single crowned “champion”.
7 posted on
12/10/2009 1:12:14 PM PST by
TheBattman
(They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
To: TitansAFC
“The system is designed to reward the big brands of the sport.”
No, it’s not. The system was invented by the SEC to promote the SEC. End of story.
To: TitansAFC
In NCAA basketball, March Madness brings in the bucks big time. Why not do the same in football?
14 posted on
12/10/2009 1:27:30 PM PST by
Reaganesque
("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
