Posted on 12/23/2009 6:26:14 AM PST by IrishMike
anything goes, as long as they conquer the health care industry.
Other Talking Points:
1) racist
2) extremist
3) Corporate shrill
4) bitter clinger
5) religious kook
6) Denier
7) chauvanist
8) uncle Tom
9) uncaring
10) greedy
The part about Alan Grayson makes me want to start up a website - HeIsNotMyCongressmanButHeIsNuts.com
I’m laughing at the fact there’s a group called “Move On” STILL complaining about the 2000 election.
Well, that’s their base - highly emotional, knee-jerk reaction types. They don’t need a reasonable arguement, just a catchy talking point or two.
These criminals, these degenerates, these marauding filth on the left are going to go down hard.
The sort of social and financial tyrannies they seek to impose can only be accomplished with terror and violence.
I truly do not believe they will find the reaction surviveable.
LOL! OUTSTANDING!!!
Red, white and blue, too!
They will call us any number of things...but the one thing they will NEVER do...is debate the evidence.
BTW, AlanGraysonIsNuts.com is taken, though no web site yet.
The Prius with the "Yes We Did" sticker.
The house in the neighborhood that had all the "0" signs.
Any Media truck.
And, in years to come when you are diagnosed with something fatal that Obama care will not treat....
All politics is local.
Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin
“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” — President Harry S. Truman (D-MO)
You forgot:
Intolerant
Bigot
Homophobe
Misogynist
For your holiday conversations:
What is “Global Warming”?
It is the theory that the mean temperature of the earth is increasing due to the greenhouse effect, caused by greenhouse gases such as CO2, which is produced by humans burning of fossil or carbon based fuels for energy. The solution to this is the reduction of the use of carbon based fuels.
OK, now that we agree on that, let’s step through this.
1st, what is the “right” mean temperature of the earth?
Has it ever changed without man’s influence?
2nd, the greenhouse effect in and of itself is not a bad thing, it is a good thing - we’d freeze to death at night or in the winter without it.
3rd, What is the most abundant, and also the most contributory “greenhouse gas”?
CO2?
No, it’s water vapor, comprising 95% of the greenhouse effect. Man’s contribution to the amount of water vapor is less than .001%, so we can ignore it.
Back to CO2. CO2 contributes around 3.6% to the greenhouse effect.
But what percentage of CO2 is natural and how much man-made? 97% of CO2 is naturally occurring, 3% due to man’s actions.
This amounts to a 0.117% man-caused contribution to the greenhouse effect due to carbon emissions.
So, even if we ELIMINATED the use of carbon based fuels for energy production, thus destroying our lifestyle and civilization, we’d have less than a .117% effect on “global warming”.
Now, I know that leftists are married to these “solutions” and will want to implement them anyway, regardless of their ineffectiveness. Now, can we discuss why? (topic for another post)
Source:Global Warming: A Closer Look at the Numbers
They’re not “anti-religion”. Their god is government, their priests are the elites, their sacrament is human sacrifice.
They’re just anti-Christian.
The Christian worldview is in diametric opposition to theirs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.