Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP source: Obama to announce bank fees Thursday
Breitbart ^ | 1/12/10 | ap

Posted on 01/12/2010 10:06:16 PM PST by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

“No way should it be at 10,600. It’s been forced there by federal meddling for payola to the mega-banksters (Goldman, JPM, etc.)”

Correcto!


101 posted on 01/13/2010 12:31:44 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I noticed


102 posted on 01/13/2010 12:34:21 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Cavuto was reporting bailed out banks were the ones being fee-ed, which I assumed was the biggest banks. I dont know that for a fact. But something has to give when the feds give handouts.


103 posted on 01/13/2010 12:58:23 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
As many others have stated, you take more from the banks, and the banks will take more from their customers.

I think it was BO's plan from the very beginning to take money from us and give it to the government, but not to call this transfer "taxes."

They may reach a point at which they don't even pretend any more though. Aren't there instances in the Obamacare bill which use the word "tax" which will take money from folks way under incomes of $250K?

104 posted on 01/13/2010 2:37:04 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Joe Wilson said "You lie!" in a room full of 500 politicians. Was he talking to only one person?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: MrPiper

thanks Mr. Piper.
I will wait and listen


105 posted on 01/13/2010 3:56:45 PM PST by wheninthecourse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Come to think of it may be Glenn Beck not Cavuto


106 posted on 01/13/2010 5:07:38 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
"Oh he knows EXACTLY where this money is going to come from, that is the whole idea. Destroy the private sector is his plan."

Crank up the printing press like his hero Hugo did.

107 posted on 01/13/2010 5:42:40 PM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs
Valerie Jarrett (the Obama advisor who was "thrilled" that they got communist Van Jones as a czar) was on Fox and Friends this morning. Said that even though Goldman Sachs had paid back the TARP money it received directly, should pay the proposed fees on "big banks" because GS got money indirectly from AIG's TARP money (which AIG evidently will not pay back).

True, other banks benefitted from the TARP, but I am not at all confident these fees will be used to reduce the deficit! More likely they will add to Obama's political slush fund.

Note the disdain for free speech in the following:

Yahoo link: The administration's proposal, which requires congressional approval, will apply only to firms with over 50 billion dollars in assets, according to the official....Even though auto firms General Motors and Chrysler also got money from the TARP fund, they will not have to pay the fee, the official added, warning financial firms not to make an issue of that omission....In addition, not all the firms that will be targeted by the fee actually received TARP funds...."I don't think that it would be wise for them to try to suggest that living up to the letter of the law is somehow an unfair burden on them," the official said....The cost of the fee levied on the financial firms will be assessed according to a formula looking at their liabilities, total assets and equity and tier-one capital.

108 posted on 01/14/2010 6:09:03 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Joe Wilson said "You lie!" in a room full of 500 politicians. Was he talking to only one person?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“but I am not at all confident these fees will be used to reduce the deficit! More likely they will add to Obama’s political slush fund.”

Exactly!


109 posted on 01/14/2010 6:11:14 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Fascism.


110 posted on 01/14/2010 7:20:28 AM PST by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; FromLori
As many others have stated, you take more from the banks, and the banks will take more from their customers.

True, but the FED, treasury, and congress giving or "lending" banks hundreds of billions to "save" them is the other side of the same coin. One kind of massive government involvement leads to the other.


111 posted on 01/14/2010 12:10:08 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Joe Wilson said "You lie!" in a room full of 500 politicians. Was he talking to only one person?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

LOL!!!!


112 posted on 01/14/2010 12:14:14 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; FromLori
RE :”True, but the FED, treasury, and congress giving or “lending” banks hundreds of billions to “save” them is the other side of the same coin. One kind of massive government involvement leads to the other.

This guy sounds like me.

Similarly, once you mandate that hospitals must give free health care for those with no insurance(or assets) , you set up a valid argument argument to mandate insurance for that care. Then libs will claim comprehensive health care with breast X-rays are required to keep them healthy is cost effective. But charging women more because they get those X-rays will be called discrimination. So men have to pay for X-rays they cant use to be fair. Then the next argument is, if those poor people get free care, why not this other group too, to be fair? Next thing you know, single payer.

Democratic socialism is a snow ball running down hill starting with one compassionate conservative. Next thing you know, rice patties!

113 posted on 01/14/2010 1:47:44 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Free money for you and me! Cool!


114 posted on 01/14/2010 3:15:24 PM PST by eclectic (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Whoa! Spreading the wealth as promised!
115 posted on 01/14/2010 3:18:36 PM PST by eclectic (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson