Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/19/2010 10:30:22 AM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

Thought I’d post this since people keep posting supposed exit poll results from dubious sources.


2 posted on 01/19/2010 10:30:59 AM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
negative commercials — which in this race ran everywhere, including, for the first time in anyone's memory, The Weather Channel.

Manipulating the weather...typical Democraps!

3 posted on 01/19/2010 10:33:31 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

I don’t see how anyone could post a valid exit poll this early in the day.

Even so, those polls have been known to be wrong. I wouldn’t pay a whole lot of attention to them.


4 posted on 01/19/2010 10:33:57 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Reporting the exit polls will make it harder for them to cheat.


7 posted on 01/19/2010 10:36:04 AM PST by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

I’m glad. Exit polls showing a big lead for Brown could suppress people voting later in the day for him. Gotta get out the vote like like we’re down a point.


13 posted on 01/19/2010 10:40:06 AM PST by Lou Budvis (She never bankrupted Alaska or bowed to royalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Have we had any of the very predictable complaints of not enough ballots and polls closed in minority neighborhoods yet? Got to set up the civil rights lawsuit ASAP don’t you know.


14 posted on 01/19/2010 10:41:16 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (Get rid of the dirty moderates. Get rid of them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
One is exit polls. There will be none tonight from Massachusetts, disappointing journalists and political scientists alike. As Mike Allen of Politico.com reports, the consortium of news outlets that normally organizes such surveys didn't bother when the race was expected to be a blowout and now "wasn't confident a reliable system could be built so fast."

The Pravda Media says "nothing to see here, move along".

16 posted on 01/19/2010 10:42:01 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Al Gore was more concerned with the evil influence of heavy metal than that of radical Imam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

I hope Brown pulls it off, but I doubt we will be able to count on catching the dems with their pants down next time.

They’ll be ready. We had better be ready too!


19 posted on 01/19/2010 10:53:47 AM PST by Wrightclick (I refuse to suffer the socialist mediocrity of a Pringles chip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
Another casualty of the expectation that the race would be a cakewalk for the Democrat will be an absence of absentee ballot fraud, the preferred method of putting an illegal thumb on the scale in a close race.

I hadn't thought of that, but that's awesome!

Nice analysis, Mr. Fund.

21 posted on 01/19/2010 10:56:49 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
... many of the usual accoutrements of closely-contested elections are missing in the Bay State.

One is exit polls.

Bull feathers! They could put that together on 36 hours notice. The big, brave polling companies of all stripes don't wanna get in trouble over speaking the truth on this one.

24 posted on 01/19/2010 11:04:20 AM PST by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
The Brown surge came so suddenly there was no time to plan anything devious beyond the usual negative commercials

What about those angry, pro-Brown robocalls done under the alleged auspices of a pro-life/pro-family organization ... which completely denied having anything to do with them?
25 posted on 01/19/2010 11:08:59 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
This won't be popular, but we - as a country - should completely do-away with absentee ballots, unless you are stationed overseas working for the US Government or US Military. It is just too available a mechanism for people who wish to fix elections, to fix them.

I'm being absolutely serious when I say that we should adopt a system where we stain the thumb of in-person voters with an indelible ink when they vote.

26 posted on 01/19/2010 11:10:50 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

According to Rush, Scott Brown is paying for his own exit polls to fill the gap the OLD MEDIA is too lazy to do.


27 posted on 01/19/2010 11:11:04 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Hours before a last-day rally for Ms. Coakley, workers pulled a long drape across midcourt at a middle school gymnasium in Framingham, a bedroom community 20 miles west of Boston. The curtain cut the small space in half, but the gym was still only a quarter full, with just a couple of hundred people standing near a podium. Thirty minutes before the event, workers slid back into place a stack of bleachers to prevent a huge gap in front of the candidate


28 posted on 01/19/2010 11:19:46 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

“One is exit polls. There will be none tonight from Massachusetts, disappointing journalists and political scientists alike. As Mike Allen of Politico.com reports, the consortium of news outlets that normally organizes such surveys didn’t bother when the race was expected to be a blowout and now “wasn’t confident a reliable system could be built so fast.””

The problem with exit polls is that they will not reflect the cheating that is going on in MA today. Remember in NY 23 the polls were proved wrong. That is because the voting fraud is massive, and it is a significant part of the vote. Acorn and many others are real busy today. I am hoping that that Browns lead is big enough here to overcome it. But if he looses then it will because the fraud was so huge. That is the only thing that could explain such a result in light of all the pre-election polls.


38 posted on 01/19/2010 1:05:41 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

No exit polls to hide the cheating on voting.


39 posted on 01/19/2010 1:13:48 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Stay armed. Buy bullets. Buy guns. Protect yourself - the government isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Who needs exit polls when the race has already been called?...

http://hotairpundit.blogspot.com/2010/01/boston-globe-already-publishing-results.html

I’m not buying the “test” explanation...especially when they had data set for every county.


40 posted on 01/19/2010 1:15:49 PM PST by Kimberly GG (Join Me In BOYCOTTING all ObamaTV!! (Change the channel or do so and then turn tv off!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

If I ever got exit-polled?!!! I’d LIE through my teeth just to skew their &^%&%%^#-ing poll!!!


47 posted on 01/19/2010 4:06:36 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

OR.... I’d ask the pollster, “What part of SECRET BALLOT don’t you people get?”


48 posted on 01/19/2010 4:07:26 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson