Skip to comments.
Democrats join in Murkowski's push against climate change rules
Houston Chronicle ^
| Jan 21, 2010
| Tom Fowler
Posted on 01/22/2010 5:12:14 AM PST by thackney
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
01/22/2010 5:12:14 AM PST
by
thackney
To: thackney
Is the Revolution moving forward or what?
Woohoo!
2
posted on
01/22/2010 5:13:34 AM PST
by
Freedom'sWorthIt
(Ronald Reagan: If we ever forget that we're one nation under God,then we'll be a nation gone under.")
To: thackney
” Sens. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., and Mary Landrieu, D-La., “
Hmmmm... The ‘Votes-for-Sale’ crowd senses profit here....
3
posted on
01/22/2010 5:15:46 AM PST
by
Uncle Ike
(Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
To: thackney
What a coincidence: all three democrats mentioned are up for re-election come November.
To: thackney
What?
Dems on the ‘right’ side of an issue?
How is this going to impact Kerry-Graham?
[Wow, did the alternate universe open up Tuesday night?]
5
posted on
01/22/2010 5:18:08 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Uncle Ike
I suppose we could call them Ferengi-senators. :-)
To: thackney
Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who supports carbon-cutting mandates, said today that "it could take us a long time" to get a bill enacted. She said that the EPA-imposed regulations are necessary in the meantime. When libs say "carbon", are they really talking about carbon dioxide? (there's really a big difference).
7
posted on
01/22/2010 5:19:39 AM PST
by
Need4Truth
(All the king's horses and all the king's men could not reprogram the Branch Carbonians.)
To: thackney
Governors, where art thou?
Stand up to the feds NOW...you may never get this opportunity again....
8
posted on
01/22/2010 5:20:54 AM PST
by
cbkaty
(I may not always post...but I am always here......)
To: Uncle Ike
“Hmmmm... The Votes-for-Sale crowd senses profit here....”
More like they are toast come the next election and they are trying to redeem themselves in the eyes of their constituents.
To: thackney
all the usual phony blue dog suspects....
We won’t be fooled again.
10
posted on
01/22/2010 5:22:34 AM PST
by
Daisyjane69
(Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
To: Witch-king of Angmar
Actually Nelson is not up until 2012. The common thread is that all 3 are on the endangered species list.
11
posted on
01/22/2010 5:23:17 AM PST
by
almcbean
To: Need4Truth
--
When libs say "carbon", are they really talking about carbon dioxide? --
Yes. Any activity that moves carbon from a solid "bound up" location (e.g., in plants and minerals) to a gaseous form (ESPECIALLY CO2) is the "carbon" they are talking about.
A lump of coal is okay, but burning it is not okay.
12
posted on
01/22/2010 5:24:27 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: thackney; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Big three running for cover-—hope the sheeple see thru this. That aside, Murkowski’s legislation is a good start.
13
posted on
01/22/2010 5:25:32 AM PST
by
BOBTHENAILER
( EPA will rule your life)
To: thackney
Let's take what we can get one piece at a time, however, they will toss crumbs as there is still new jobs waiting w/ offshore drilling bans and federal drilling bans in effect.
Zewoe's Czars & Co. have attacked coal and its possible expansion in use.
Cheaper energy = cheape manufacturing costs & reduced COL.....that's not happening at this time and that is a key to starting economic recovery...Oh, did I also mention reducing the size of goobermint, reduced corporate taxes, and holding individual taxes steady?
14
posted on
01/22/2010 5:33:51 AM PST
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: RSmithOpt
federal drilling = federal land exploratory drilling bans.
15
posted on
01/22/2010 5:36:33 AM PST
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: BOBTHENAILER
Nelson and the Lousianna Purchase might not survive the backlash if they push the climate change bs.
They and their states are in enough trouble with their back door illegal bs re the $ociali$t health care takeover.
16
posted on
01/22/2010 5:37:02 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Does 0b0z0 have any friends, who aren't traitors, spies, tax cheats and criminals?)
To: Need4Truth
Boxer is so dumb she doesn’t know the difference between hot and cold and carbon dioxide and oxygen.
17
posted on
01/22/2010 5:38:32 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Does 0b0z0 have any friends, who aren't traitors, spies, tax cheats and criminals?)
To: thackney
The EPA is more fascistic than the ATF. The extra constitutional powers it has been granted by all three branches of government make it one of the greatest threats to our freedom.
There are no property rights that the EPA recognizes, and the rule of law is completely out the window with EPA rulings.
To: almcbean
" The common thread is that all 3 are on the endangered species list. "
For a politician in Washington who is in political trouble in a election year, it's called self preservation and don't tick off the voters until they are sown in .... after that, they don't care what the people think until election time comes up again....
People ? don't get fooled again...
19
posted on
01/22/2010 6:15:30 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: American Constitutionalist
People ? don't get fooled again... These hacks can just tell which way the wind blows. Can't be trusted, we should post their records as much as possible.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson