Skip to comments.
Federal government responds to Montana Firearms Freedom Act
Cleveland gun Rights Examiner ^
| January 22, 2010
| Daniel White
Posted on 01/22/2010 6:59:46 AM PST by Still Thinking
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: Still Thinking
Thanks for posting. I wondered what was happening with the movement...
To: Still Thinking
Let’s wake up the 10th Amendment!
3
posted on
01/22/2010 7:01:42 AM PST
by
Loud Mime
(Liberalism is a Socialist Disease)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
There's an entire website dedicated to it at
FirearmsFreedomAct.com, which is where the author that that status map.
4
posted on
01/22/2010 7:03:03 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Loud Mime
I’m proud that AZ has finally moved from the “intending” to “introduced” column. I’ll have to check to see if they’ve included a provision like the New Hampshire bill criminalizing attempts by employees or agents of the fed to enforce the laws being repudiated.
5
posted on
01/22/2010 7:05:06 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Still Thinking
” a valid exercise of commerse(sic) power”
Bull! They use that excuse far too often.
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Maybe they should spend more time in spelling class and less time in our business.
7
posted on
01/22/2010 7:07:13 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Still Thinking
The Feds counter that it is a valid exercise of commerse power because even sales of firearms that don't cross state lines have an effect on interstate commerce. Yet another bad idea that came out of the FDR administration that has previously been supported by the courts.
Just because it has an effect on interstate commerce, it is not interstate commerce. That is equivalent to saying that the US government can regulate trade between the Middle East and China, as it could affect interstate commerce.
To: Loud Mime
The time is now...this peach is ripe and ready for pickin’... States rights must be strictly enforced by the people.
9
posted on
01/22/2010 7:08:15 AM PST
by
cbkaty
(I may not always post...but I am always here......)
To: bamahead; ForGod'sSake
Finger in the feds’ eye ping!
10
posted on
01/22/2010 7:08:54 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: kosciusko51
11
posted on
01/22/2010 7:12:55 AM PST
by
thecabal
(Destroy Progressivism)
To: thecabal
You ARE just posting that for background and not to say this movement is out-of-line, right? If not, see Dred Scott and Barron.
12
posted on
01/22/2010 7:14:33 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Still Thinking
Finger in the feds eye ping!SCOTUS just ruled that corporations are people and their money is speech. Let's see if they'll revisit the definitions of interstate commerce as a result of this case.
To: Still Thinking
Of course I don't agree with Wickard v. Filburn. It's a lousy piece of crap that came out of FDR's stacked court. Just stating what the current Federales are using as their excuse to trample our rights.
14
posted on
01/22/2010 7:17:49 AM PST
by
thecabal
(Destroy Progressivism)
To: cbkaty
John Paul Stevens' dissent in the
recent case shows the disconnet between the liberals and any application of law or liberty that endangers their march toward socialism.
These people are after power, and will define any law in ways that they can get it. They will fight against State powers every step of the way.
15
posted on
01/22/2010 7:18:17 AM PST
by
Loud Mime
(Liberalism is a Socialist Disease)
To: Still Thinking
I thought states rights/laws trumpet federal law unless it’s unconstitutional?
16
posted on
01/22/2010 7:20:48 AM PST
by
MsLady
(If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
To: Still Thinking
I predict Montana loses this round.
To: thecabal
Oh, good. I didn’t mean to be overly suspicious, but I’ve actually seen Freepers say that Wickard is the law of the land and we can’t do anything that would run afoul of it.
18
posted on
01/22/2010 7:24:12 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: thecabal
19
posted on
01/22/2010 7:24:41 AM PST
by
Loud Mime
(Liberalism is a Socialist Disease)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
20
posted on
01/22/2010 7:26:40 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson