Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Brown Doesn’t Rule Out 2012 Presidential Bid (WTH??)
Breitbart ^ | 1/31/10 | staff

Posted on 01/31/2010 11:39:15 AM PST by pissant

Scott Brown Doesn’t Rule Out 2012 Presidential Bid

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.tv ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; brown2012; democrats; elections; gop; idiot; republicans; scottbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-238 next last
To: Sarah Barracuda

I think Barbara was trying to get him to say something negative about her, and of course he didn’t. The democrats are afraid of Sarah and now Scott also.


161 posted on 01/31/2010 3:53:07 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Barbara Walters is a baboon’s ass. I can’t stand that witch. All she does is kiss the Obama’s ass every second


162 posted on 01/31/2010 3:55:32 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

It’s called ‘divide and conquer’ and it’s played by the same group daily.

I am surprised by Breitbart’s misleading headline.


163 posted on 01/31/2010 3:56:10 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

LOL.

She’s such an old hag. Way past her time to retire too.


164 posted on 01/31/2010 3:57:12 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

You are absolutely right on, and Breitbart is the one responsible for that.


165 posted on 01/31/2010 3:58:57 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

We are giving him a chance, but remember his voting record in Mass.(pro choice etc.) shows some left wing stripes to him. We have been burned before. Remember before 2006 the Repubs had the Congress and the Presidency and squandered their opportunity to reduce the size of government and opened the door for the current crop of socialists/communists. Remember what Reagan said “Trust but verify”.


166 posted on 01/31/2010 3:59:13 PM PST by orinoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

“Interesting so many on FR find no fault with Obama to the point they find no negatives to post against Obama.

But, These same FReepers can’t wait bash Sarah Palin or Scott Brown and post away.”

Excellent, insightful post.

As they say, none are so blind that will not see. People should stop and think about what you said, unfortunately your observation is completely correct. People need to wake up and see who the real enemy is.


167 posted on 01/31/2010 4:00:47 PM PST by SmartInsight (Scott Brown for President 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I seem to remember another hyper-ambitious US Senator, who barely having been elected to the Senate decided he was just the man to be the next President. Name: John Edwards

I seem to remember another hyper-ambitious US Senator, who barely having been elected to the Senate decided he was just the man to be the next President. Name: Barrack Obama

I seem to remember another hyper-ambitious US Senator, who barely having been elected to the Senate decided he was just the man to be the next President. Name: Scott Brown

If history is any indication, we should keep a VERY close eye on this guy. He took advantage of a situation to get where he is, so he will clearly take advantages when they are presented if it furthers his ambitions.


168 posted on 01/31/2010 4:02:18 PM PST by spodefly (I have posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

I seem to remember another hyper-ambitious US Senator, who barely having been elected to the Senate decided he was just the man to be the next President. Name: Scott Brown

And your evidence that Scott Brown "decided he was just the man to be the next President" is...?

Please show me

The headline posted here by Pissant and copied from Breitbart is leading, and misleading. Without that headline, you would never deduce from Brown's answer to Walters that he was even considering the Presidency.

169 posted on 01/31/2010 4:14:16 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

EEEk. Upon reflection my previous post sounds harsher than I meant it to. I sent money to Brown, and I believe he was the right guy in the right place at the right time. If Brown goes to DC and does his job for the reminder of the term (not that I expect him to be totally conservative on all issues) then it’s fine.

But I am very wary now of ambitious senators. That’s all I was trying to say.


170 posted on 01/31/2010 4:15:34 PM PST by spodefly (I have posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

“WTF? Is this guy a white version of Obama?”
________

I don’t get what race has to do with anything.


171 posted on 01/31/2010 4:18:12 PM PST by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #172 Removed by Moderator

To: adc
Many Americans believe the SCOTUS is one conservative justice away from abolishing Roe v Wade and ending abortion on demand as the national policy of the US federal government. CJ Roberts has recently been talking about the possiblity of overturning precedent, aka. stare decisis.

If Roe was overturned by SCOTUS, the abortion issue would revert back to the states and those state laws that existed before Roe would be enforce again. That would definitely reduce the number of abortions nationally. The next step would be to get a Human Life amendment to the Constitution, similar to the one Reagan proposed back in the early 1980`s.

However, Scott Brown is an unapologetic abortion proponent and he supports Roe v Wade as the Constitutional law of the land. Many CongressCritters oppose partial birth abortion. After all, its infanticide and its inherently evil. Even Dirty Harry Reid opposes PBA.

Reagan was out front and open in public about his opposition to Roe v Wade and abortion on demand, and stated so on numerous occasions. In 1976, Reagan chose pro-life champion Richard Schweiker, one of the earliest supporters of a Human LIfe amendment to the Constitution, to be his running mate. Marking the GOP as the Pro-Life party in America. In 1983 President Reagan wrote his famous essay, Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation. Reagan was never "in your face" on any isssue, but he was always out front on the abortion issue.

173 posted on 01/31/2010 4:22:51 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
>>>>>You should have checked the link I provided. I did NOT say this, this was a quote from the article in the Christian Post, the link to which I provided in my post. Go take it up with them.

So what! I never commented either way on whether those were your words or not. I merely took exception to such a factually incorrect statement. Btw, wasn't that reply posted by you? Yeah boy!

>>>>>Definitely, 8 years of Obama is so much better, than Scott Brown as president. (more sarc)

This flippant remark shows you don't respect the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution and the right to life components of both documents. Once again, you can not be taken seriously. Neither Obama or Brown are pro-life and neither one would EVER get my vote.

174 posted on 01/31/2010 4:38:11 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

LOL.....well, her scoundrel of a husband.


175 posted on 01/31/2010 4:44:01 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

Scott Brown- Michele Bachmann . .

Team 2012


176 posted on 01/31/2010 4:52:48 PM PST by MarkAccord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Overturning Roe v. Wade is a pipe dream.


177 posted on 01/31/2010 4:54:08 PM PST by MarkAccord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: pissant

We’ve now found out that Scott Brown is pro-choice. He’s FOR the killing of children in the womb. That tells me all I need to know. A man of no character. Scratch another one of the list.


178 posted on 01/31/2010 4:55:04 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail! The Totalitarians have taken over!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: behzinlea
I'll support whomever gets the nomination--although I'm going to have to stifle my gag and vomit reflex if it's Huckabee.

You are kinder than me.

One one hand, ObaMao set the bar pretty low. On the other, after three more years of suffering under his misrule, I'm confident that the bar will be raised just a little bit.

179 posted on 01/31/2010 4:58:17 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kittykat77
Brown is a wonderful breath of fresh air for the GOP.

He might be, for the GOP -- but not for Conservatives. He's pro-choice, which means he's FOR the killing of children in the womb. How much more disgusting could he be?

180 posted on 01/31/2010 4:58:57 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail! The Totalitarians have taken over!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson