Posted on 02/10/2010 12:16:08 PM PST by agondonter
humble.. Nice work taking a little snip of my post out of context after I made you look like the complete fool youo are. Are you related to Keith Olbermann?
I thank you very much for pointing out my dyslexia
Would you please correct anything you think is wrong
Or would you just like to resort to pointing out disabilities ?
Got it LOL
See, that’s what I’m talking about. Unwarranted smack talk.
I’m fixin to fire back.
What a shame.
I understand she is connected to the PaulBots. You know that wouldn’t be a bad idea; except what should have been a good idea(PaulBots)has turned into nothing but a group of bullies who like spoiled children who don’t get their way while they profess to love peace. That is a real shame too because they had a golden opportunity to do the right thing; but I suppose nothing but winning got in the way.
You are only seeing the surface of Ms. Medina who is so unqualified; it’s unbelievable. If you vote for her; you will maybe an Obama or at the very least Arnold.
Humblegunner ROCKS.....
Ms. Medina is a crybaby. She also thinks she is entitled to an office she is clearly not prepared for and has not earned the right to run for. She doesn’t work well with others and if you go against her; she will sue you. She did the Republican Party of Tx when she wouldn’t play by the rules. That’s not what I call leadership.
Oboma and his administration does come to mind....Medina has far far Far less than these, can you imagine what would happen to Texas, (which by the way is celebrated by other states for holding their own thru this crisis), should Medina be voted in...I shudder!
Additionally I'm afraid that tea party people may very well vote for less than experienced people who step up to run...it's possible to have both conservative and experience...they must be able to navigate within the state and DC political arena or they will be ineffective.
It's important to look at an individuals effectiveness...Medina has none in Politics....her guy she supported lost. So her history is weak at best.
She wouldn’t play by the rules of the corrupt GOP leadership in Texas?
Ohhhhh Nooooo.. We can’t have her now can we. She didn’t get in line and follow elitists directives.
Man, some of the minds on this thread are so brainwashed, warped, and deformed, you cannot help but to accept the shenanigans of the national parties, It’s FREAKING SCARY!
You should be scared. This woman is no leader. For once, quit being gullible and read between the lines.
Me being gullible? Lol... Keep swallowing your GOP talking points being force fed to you.
“She wouldn’t play by the rules of the {corrupt GOP leadership in Texas}?”
Can you please provide some specific examples of corruption? Like names, circumstances, dates?
And I don’t mean just differences of opinions. I mean prosecutable criminal corruption.
Thanks in advance.
Get your head out of the sand. This is what you should be looking for; not some politicial front.
Look, if I were hiring someone; I would choose the person who may have a better resume than me, more experience perhaps, has leadership ability and is promotable because that person will probably do the best job for the company as well as make me look good. Medina doesn’t strike me as that kind of person. She seems combative; doesn’t work well with others; expectations are to high; and she doesn’t seem serious about the job. I don’t want to take a chance if a real problem came along. Of course these are only my opinions.
I am not telling you who to vote for; just the reality.
Well, I guess the medina troll won’t answer a simple question.
Don’t know about Medina trolls, but I’ll tell you now, Perry and Hutchison had better look out. Perry has not made me unhappy, but I’m so pissed at incumbent politicians that he needs a break from the “profession”. I believe in term limits. Hutchison also needs a break, but more than that, the attack ads in her name against Perry, irritate the heck out of me. Lastly, people whose opinions I greatly respect, are avid on Medina. Time will tell, but at this point, I am 99% sure Medina will get my vote, and from what I can tell, she’s got a lot of my friend’s votes.
It doesn’t have to be criminal to be corruption.
There are no laws governing who a party wants to promote through the heirarchy. But it’s the game of networking, kissing ass, and getting in line. Being one of the “Good ol’ boys.”
It’s the crap you deal with when you only have two parties running the show.
Hey don’t let me bother you. It’s my policy to oppose and ouster phony suits who make politics a career. Serving as an elected public official was never intended to be a 40-year career by our founding fathers.
Keep putting these jackasses in. I don’t want to hear you whine how horrible everything is then. Rick Perry (and countless other Republicans) and Barack Obama are not that far apart. It’s these types of Republicans who have blown the 1994 and 2002 majorities on Capital Hill.
This is such crap. Please point out the policy similarities between Mrs. Medina and those two.
It's obvious that your definition of 'qualified' is based on several propositions:
-You must be a lawyer
-You must be a career politician
-You must have spent many years in Washington
-You must have the backing of the political machine
-Your crowning achievement needs to be "doing slightly more good than harm in a Constitutionally weak governorship".
Why don't you go back to the blanket insults like "She's just a nurse"? That's much less brain-dead than the whole "unqualified" racket.
Any citizen active in their political community who makes an honest living outside of politics and has the right ideology and policies is imminently more qualified than someone who's spent most of their life playing the game of politics.
The founding documents and principles of Texas and the nation are not written for lawyers or the elite. The role of government executive and legislator is understandable to the common man and woman. Always was.
Go ahead and buy into the idea of a ruling elite, who have a secret rulebook unavailable to the rest of us. I'll stick to the principle that politicians should be citizen statesmen and women, who go into public life for a short period and then return to their trade. You can have your groomed elites.
Texas has a ridiculously weak governorship by design. The power rests with the Lt. Governor.
Our legislature meets once every two years for about five months, and the governor's job is to basically veto any garbage that comes across their desk.
If you can point to specific policy directives from Mrs. Medina that might be damaging, please feel free.
Otherwise butt out.
Yes, and Perry's experience led him to endorse Rudy Giuliani in the Republican presidential primaries.
A lot of good that "better resume" did.
She seems combative...
Good! I'd rather have a combative candidate than someone who endorses establishment RINOs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.