1 posted on
02/14/2010 8:27:05 PM PST by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
The temperature records can’t be relied on because they have been subjected to so much monkey business.
“No mom, that really wasn’t my hand, and that really wasn’t the cookie jar. Anyhow look ma, there are no cookies in the jar.”
2 posted on
02/14/2010 8:30:06 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: Steelfish
Yeah, the dog at the data.
3 posted on
02/14/2010 8:31:09 PM PST by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Steelfish
Now if the New York Times and Washington Post would run that headline...
4 posted on
02/14/2010 8:31:23 PM PST by
GeronL
(Dignity is earned from yourself. Respect is earned from others.)
To: Steelfish
Memo to ABCCBSNBCMSNBCCNNNYTIMESWAPO and all the other true believers:
Get on the bus or get under it.
To: Steelfish
9 posted on
02/14/2010 8:37:12 PM PST by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: Steelfish
Well, if the world isn’t getting warmer, can we go ahead and do the “cap and trade” stuff anyway? Seems a shame to waste all that time and paperwork? (/s)
parsy, who is waiting for the next Goldman Sachs screw job
11 posted on
02/14/2010 8:40:42 PM PST by
parsifal
(Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
To: Steelfish
Next congress: get some of those jerks to testify under oath, subpoena their data and have at it.
It deserves to be the scandal it is.
14 posted on
02/14/2010 9:03:00 PM PST by
dajeeps
To: Steelfish
It’s not about science, it’s about control.
The control will NOT be relinquished.
To: Steelfish
"casting doubt on its claim that global temperatures are rising inexorably because of human pollution." CO2 isn't "pollution". Without it, there wouldn't be any plant life on the planet.
17 posted on
02/14/2010 9:17:55 PM PST by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: Steelfish
Take the medal and give it to Irena Adler. A TRULY deserving woman. Too bad, it will be posthumous, but she didn’t save thousands of innocent kids and endure torture to conceal them and her cohorts for a medal, anyway.
To: Steelfish
The doubts of Christy and a number of other researchers focus on the thousands of weather stations around the world . . .These stations, they believe, have been seriously compromised by factors such as urbanisation, changes in land use and . . . How did they ever get a screwball idea like that?
Watts Up With That?
To: Steelfish; Carlucci; Desdemona; meyer; Para-Ord.45; Normandy; mmanager; FreedomPoster; ...
22 posted on
02/15/2010 12:14:30 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
To: Steelfish
[Time Up For Al Gore's Medal Recall] Why bother recalling it? Everyone knows the prize is just a useless piece of political trash and has been such for a long, long time. Every future recipient stands in the proud tradition of recipients including an unrepentant terrorist, a do-nothing who got it merely for the color of skin (and not content of his character) and a known charlatan.
27 posted on
02/15/2010 7:27:51 AM PST by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
To: Steelfish
28 posted on
02/15/2010 7:28:53 AM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
