Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trisham

Yet this is EXACTLY what many libertarians thinks the Constitution allows.


559 posted on 02/21/2010 12:26:06 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

Well, I am no libertarian.


560 posted on 02/21/2010 12:30:32 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; trisham; anyone
You guys are missing the point by such a wide margin it is hard to even know where to begin. This has nothing to do with Ron Paul. He is a near octogenarian, non-candidate who is not very photogenic or eloquent. It's his ideas that are sexy and appealing to young voters. Stupid stuff like liberty, freedom, limited government. This is GOOD NEWS for the future of our nation. Look at the bright side, young Americans don't want Gubmint cheese, they like limited gubmint. You could substitute the name "Ron Paul" with "Snoopy". It's not the person, it's the message....

"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is. Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say, because I think that like in any political movement there are shades, and there are libertarians who are almost over at the point of wanting no government at all or anarchy. I believe there are legitimate government functions. There is a legitimate need in an orderly society for some government to maintain freedom or we will have tyranny by individuals. The strongest man on the block will run the neighborhood. We have government to insure that we don’t each one of us have to carry a club to defend ourselves. But again, I stand on my statement that I think that libertarianism and conservatism are travelling the same path".

--Ronald Reagan

Inside Ronald Reagan: A Reason Interview from July 1975

When, not if, Republicans get back into power, they should remember this. The national GOP party wants money and power to keep their cushy jobs. Know the difference between a legitimate gubmint function and social engineering/handouts to keep getting elected.

572 posted on 02/21/2010 3:20:46 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Beware of the Socialist Government-Academia Grant Junkie-Rich "non-profit"-Liberal Media Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson