To: samtheman
I don't really care all that much because I'm not about to join the John Birch Society but I'm suspicious of Levin saying that he didn't speak at CPAC because the Birchers were there. Is the real reason because he didn't want to be upstaged by Beck?
Levin is in no danger of being upstaged by anyone not named Rush Limbaugh.
152 posted on
02/21/2010 2:05:58 PM PST by
Terpfen
(FR is being Alinskied. Remember, you only take flak when you're over the target.)
To: Terpfen
Levin is in no danger of being upstaged by anyone not named Rush Limbaugh.Well, you say that, and I would certainly think that but the fact is, Beck was given the coveted Saturday Night Lecture and Levin was offered something else and grumbled "not if the Birchers are there" and, I'm sorry, could it be...
j - e - a - l - o - u - s - y ?
To: Terpfen
I don't really care all that much because I'm not about to join the John Birch Society but I'm suspicious of Levin saying that he didn't speak at CPAC because the Birchers were there. Is the real reason because he didn't want to be upstaged by Beck? Levin is in no danger of being upstaged by anyone not named Rush Limbaugh.
Personality preferences aside, you put Beck and Levin at the same show: Beck sucks up all of the oxygen. Beck attracts the crowds. Beck gets all of the soundbites. Beck grabs 90% of the headlines.
Levin knows that and it rankles him every waking moment of his life right now.
385 posted on
02/21/2010 4:04:39 PM PST by
Ghengis
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson