Skip to comments.
bearded and cross-eyed
Yahoo Most Emailed Photos ^
| March 3, 2010
| Yahoo News
Posted on 03/03/2010 1:36:25 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
A Muslim woman wearing a niqab. An Arab ambassador called off his wedding after discovering his wife-to-be, who had worn a face-covering veil whenever they met, was bearded and cross-eyed, the Gulf News reported
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: islam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Berlin_Freeper
Poor lady. I feel sorry for her. If he liked her personality that much and must have had the money, he could have paid to have her eyes fixed and laser hair removal. Sigh.
2
posted on
03/03/2010 1:38:52 PM PST
by
Suz in AZ
To: Berlin_Freeper
3
posted on
03/03/2010 1:39:54 PM PST
by
P.O.E.
(Giant Gila Monster)
To: Berlin_Freeper
No problem just keep her niqab on.
To: Berlin_Freeper
5
posted on
03/03/2010 1:41:54 PM PST
by
Bobalu
(In Missouri now...back among my own people :-)
To: Berlin_Freeper
To: Berlin_Freeper
Here's a picture of the lovely lady...
7
posted on
03/03/2010 1:42:10 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Berlin_Freeper
To: Berlin_Freeper
Wow, an actual two-bagger in real life.
9
posted on
03/03/2010 1:44:34 PM PST
by
Argus
To: Berlin_Freeper
OK, I can understand the bearded thing, but, come on, if he can’t see the only part of her body that IS visable - her eyes and they are crossed. Hard to believe.
10
posted on
03/03/2010 1:47:05 PM PST
by
Bitsy
To: Berlin_Freeper
Usually the groom gets a good look at the bride while under supervision of the brides father before the deal is done. Guess the family should have invested in Nair and some sunglasses. You live, you learn. Ala akbar....durka, durka, durka...kill jooooze
To: Suz in AZ
Poor lady. I feel sorry for her. I do too; I worry about anyone who doesn't.
12
posted on
03/03/2010 1:50:36 PM PST
by
TNLawyer
("Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,")
To: Berlin_Freeper
Kiss me quick!
13
posted on
03/03/2010 1:53:18 PM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
14
posted on
03/03/2010 2:28:00 PM PST
by
RichInOC
("C'm'on, baby, give Daddy some lovin'." "Baaaaaaaa!")
To: Berlin_Freeper
can this possibly be a FIRST? I mean there could be all manner of atrocity hidden away under those coverings, so they are really buying the proverbial, pig in a poke, aren’t they?
15
posted on
03/03/2010 2:30:00 PM PST
by
xsmommy
To: paulycy
16
posted on
03/03/2010 2:33:59 PM PST
by
Daffynition
(What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
To: Daffynition
17
posted on
03/03/2010 2:36:18 PM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: paulycy
18
posted on
03/03/2010 2:43:45 PM PST
by
null and void
(We are now in day 405 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: null and void
"Can't you learn to love me?"
19
posted on
03/03/2010 2:48:42 PM PST
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: xsmommy
In Ottoman Turkey, high-born ladies used the required coverings to escape detection so that they could engage in illicit assignations under the “protection” of escorting eunuchs. Perhaps, since eunuch slaves are no longer in plentiful supply, such behavior is no longer feasible.
As always, beware of unintended consequences.
20
posted on
03/03/2010 3:00:35 PM PST
by
bagman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
