Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Code Words (Glenn Beck urges Christians to leave churches that preach "social justice")
National Review ^ | 03/17/2010 | John Leo

Posted on 03/17/2010 9:02:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

When Glenn Beck urged Christians to leave churches that preach social justice, he allowed himself to be tripped up by conventional buzzwords of the campus Left. In plain English, “social justice” is a goal of all churches and refers to helping the poor and seeking equality. As a code word, it refers to a controversial package of goals including political redistribution of wealth, gay marriage, and a campaign against “institutional racism,” “classism,” “ableism,” and “heterosexism.” Beck was wildly off base linking “social justice” (of either form) to Communism and Nazism, but he was correct to note that the term is often used as a code.

In the words of Peter Wood, head of the National Association of Scholars, “The campus left learned with its promotion of the concept of ‘diversity’ the advantages of packaging hard-core ideology in bland, feel-good terminology.” “Social justice” is one of several terms — others include “dispositions,” “sustainability,” and “cultural competence” — that has been given in-group meanings by the wordsmiths of the cultural Left.

In 2002, for example, the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) issued new guidelines requiring education departments that listed social justice as a goal to “include some measure of a candidate’s commitment to social justice” when evaluating the “dispositions” of their students. As soon became clear, this provided education schools a back-door method of ensuring ideological conformity among their students.

At Brooklyn College, Washington State, and Alaska-Fairbanks — all public institutions covered by the First Amendment — students were punished for voicing opinions that differed from those of the faculty. At Washington State, where the college of education tried to expel a student for his conservative opinions, the dean was asked whether Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia could pass a disposition test at the school. “I’m not sure how to answer that,” she replied.

Eventually, NCATE clarified its wording a bit. Sounding very much like Jim Wallis teeing off against Glenn Beck, NCATE protested the attack on the words “social justice,” saying, “To most Americans the phrase social justice is positive and connotes values associated with the Judeo-Christian tradition.” The problem is that even in its mildest form, the insistence on dedication to social justice puts schools in a position of judging the acceptability of students’ political and social opinions.

Other fashionable buzzwords include “secure livelihoods” and “strong economies,” which seem to refer to redistribution of wealth, not economic development to create new wealth. (Few of the words are precisely defined, but used in context, they convey the general idea.) “Cultural competence” may sound like it would refer to knowledge of different cultures. But it really means the acceptance of multicultural ideology and cultural relativism.

The most potent of the current buzzwords is “sustainability,” which ties traditional environmentalism to the entire left-wing agenda. As Wood says, hundreds of campuses now have sustainability officers, courses that promote the ideology, and most ominously “co-curricular programs run through student life and residence halls to ‘educate’ students about their mistaken ‘worldviews’ and bring them aboard this new ideological ark.” Kathleen Kerr, who ran an astonishing all-out indoctrination program in the residential halls of the University of Delaware (students were all expected to accuse themselves of racism, for example), admitted in a speech that “the social-justice aspects of sustainability education” included lessons on “environmental racism” “domestic partnerships,” and “gender equity.” We are far from tree-hugging here.

The apparently harmless lingo of the Left can’t be taken at face value. It needs an English translation.

— John Leo is editor of Minding the Campus, a website of the Manhattan Institute.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: church; codewords; glennbeck; lds; mormon; religiousleft; socialjustice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: MBB1984
Beck was spot on and the author clueless. The Bible says to help the poor, the widow and the orphan which is exactly what the church should teach. However, it also says that those who don’t work should not eat. And, those who do not take care of their families are worse than infidels.

There is no biblical reference to having the government steal from one person to give to another. What the bible does advocate is that we give out of the abundance that God has given to us. And charatable giving always increases when taxes are lowered and decreases when taxes are raised

21 posted on 03/17/2010 9:23:11 AM PDT by Cowman (I'd like to eliminate stupidity in the world but this %$#@ conscience thing is in the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“If you donate $100 to the Salvation Army, most of it will actually be used to help people.”

True, you’d might not be so excited to help some of these “needing people” if you saw a lot of them. At Christmas, I volunteered at the Salvation Army for their present give away.

The place was filled with rude people talking on their blue tooth phones who drove up in their Cadillac Escalades and women carrying $1000 purses.

Many of these people will claim they have 8 children.

I think I’d rather the $90 to go to a lazy government buerocrat.


22 posted on 03/17/2010 9:24:10 AM PDT by MNDude (The Republican Congress Economy--1995-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There is a movie presentation in the museum by South Dakotas famous “native son broadcaster” who is explaining the history of the United states. It is not what you expect to hear, so you have to pay attention. Brother and I both heard it.
23 posted on 03/17/2010 9:24:58 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Notice that even in that text, the poor are required to get up and glean for themselves. It is NOT a service provided for them by the government!!!!

This social justice movement looks for the government to be the answer, not Christ, his followers and the underprivileged themselves to provide for peoples needs!! Also, these churches preach this garbage exclusively and never go near the preaching of the actual gospel. All the good works in the world are empty if congregants do not receive Christ as savior.

24 posted on 03/17/2010 9:28:07 AM PDT by Anti-Hillary (Yo Barry, IF FOR 20 YEARS YOU STAY IN THE PEW, IT'S BECAUSE YOU SHARE THE VIEW!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Social justice” usually refers to the notion that it is somehow “unjust” that someone who works gets paid and someone who doesn’t work, doesn’t.


25 posted on 03/17/2010 9:31:11 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is a difference between leaving a church, and leaving the faith. A church is a building, a group of people who worship together. If the values of an invidiual church depart from that of scripture, it is likely worth finding another church.

In most cases, “social justice” is a euphemism for socialism ... and it is as corrupting within the church as is the “prosperity gospel”. “Social justice” churches tend to preach as if Christ was a community organizer, a peacenik, a groovy guy who wore robes and sandals, had long flowy hair, and preached free love. It is a distortion of the gospel for political ends.

SnakeDoc


26 posted on 03/17/2010 9:38:38 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions." -- Robin Hood (Russell Crowe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Great thread. Thanks to every poster. HOORAY Glenn Beck!


27 posted on 03/17/2010 9:42:27 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; P-Marlowe; wagglebee

While I agree with Beck about leaving churches that preach social justice, I also strongly urge them to leave any group that doesn’t teach historic Christian Trinitarianism.

They aren’t really Christian.


28 posted on 03/17/2010 9:43:38 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Learn the lesson of Joseph and the Hebrews. Joseph helped Pharaoh plunder the people to help the people through a crisis, to take their property, to move them into cities, and to make them serfs, paying Pharaoh to take care of them, and Joseph’s great grandchildren became Pharaoh’s slaves. That kind of social justice will turn us into slaves too. The principles of good government are embodied in the ten commandments and the golden rule, beginning with thou shall not use government to steal from others, as you would not have others stealing from you.


29 posted on 03/17/2010 9:47:51 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thanks for not keeping this confined to the “religion” forums.

I don’t like to respond there, because it feels like trolling.

Here, these socialist churches can be held in the light and viewed for their actions.


30 posted on 03/17/2010 9:54:53 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I don't know who wrote it on Mt. Rushmore, but it is wrong. It is “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”, which is freedom not wealth redistribution. Social justice is an euphemism for wealth redistribution.
31 posted on 03/17/2010 10:03:25 AM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile
I think Beck got it right and this author has it wrong, especially since the words do not have the same meaning that the author attributes to them. Social justice is Marxist language and always has been.

I agree. "Justice" is a legal term... it's an ominous sign when a movement intending to impose legal ramifications on social norms. As for churches having always been about social justice, I have to say, I'm surprised. I thought they were about salvation.

32 posted on 03/17/2010 10:04:51 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (I miss having a First LADY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

intending = intends ... I didn’t follow through on my edit. Oops.


33 posted on 03/17/2010 10:08:15 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (I miss having a First LADY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Jim Wallis servers another Master. Time to call these monsters for who and what they are.


34 posted on 03/17/2010 10:09:54 AM PDT by Noumenon ("Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, that he has grown so great?" - Julius Caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile

It’s been some time since the majority of our churches have fallen under the sway of the Gramscian long march through the institutions. They are corrupt, and should be treated as such. Make your own arrangement with your Creator. Lose the corrupt middlemen.


35 posted on 03/17/2010 10:13:00 AM PDT by Noumenon ("Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, that he has grown so great?" - Julius Caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I recall Walter Williams offering a $1,000 bounty for anyone who can coherently define “social justice.” I doubt it has been claimed.


36 posted on 03/17/2010 10:21:41 AM PDT by walford (http://the-big-pic.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

At my church they had a couple speak for about 10 minutes after mass about “social teaching” and they invited parishoners to go to the donut social where they had a booth. I checked it out and saw a few books penned by Jim Wallis (Commie/heretic). I knew to walk away when I saw that and many others did too when they saw those books. I was there for about 40 minutes and looked like they drew very few people to talk them and the auditorium was packed. Most people in our parish are very kind, generous people and recognized this heresy for what is.


37 posted on 03/17/2010 10:32:47 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberalism is the politics of EVIL whose time of judgment has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

He is a commie.


38 posted on 03/17/2010 10:34:49 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberalism is the politics of EVIL whose time of judgment has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

He’s worse. He is a monster, using the trappings of religion to sell slavery and submission to tyranny.


39 posted on 03/17/2010 10:36:47 AM PDT by Noumenon ("Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, that he has grown so great?" - Julius Caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

“Beware of false prophets who come to you as wolves in sheep’s clothing!”


40 posted on 03/17/2010 10:38:29 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberalism is the politics of EVIL whose time of judgment has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson