Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Stupak amendment fails 199 to 232 (The Motion to Recommit)
Weekly Standard ^

Posted on 03/21/2010 11:14:44 PM PDT by Chet 99

The GOP is now offering its motion to recommit: the Stupak-Pitts amendment which passed the House 240 to 194 in November to ban abortion-funding. If it passes, the bill will have to go back to the Senate for approval, which means at least 25 Democrats will flip-flop on their previous vote on Stupak.

Stupak is now urging fellow members to vote it down.

Update: The Stupak amendment fails 199 to 232.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: stupak; stupakpitts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 03/21/2010 11:14:44 PM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

So much for Stupak’s principles. Enjoy your pieces of silver while you can!


2 posted on 03/21/2010 11:18:17 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
Stupak is now urging fellow members to vote it down.

I give STUpak in November about a 2% chance in winning his seat back.

3 posted on 03/21/2010 11:20:25 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Maybe you left an F out of the caps part of his name?


4 posted on 03/21/2010 11:22:49 PM PDT by Anima Mundi (Utopia means no place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

a “stupak” will become a word in common usage meaning an ultimate spineless fraud and hypocrite.


5 posted on 03/21/2010 11:22:49 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

I thought Biggie shot Stupak...


6 posted on 03/21/2010 11:23:05 PM PDT by Originalist (Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. - RWR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

I think this second vote will on the MTR tells us clearly which DIMS really opposed the HCR bill and which ones were shills trying to use the vote as cover for re-election. Remember, Nazi P. was letting some of them vote NO as protection in tough re-elections in November. Look at the 22 who voted with Repubs on the Motion, and you’ll see the only DIMS who are truly pro-life and anti-HCR.


7 posted on 03/21/2010 11:24:03 PM PDT by erkyl (We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office --Aesop (~550 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"I give STUpak in November about a 2% chance in winning his seat back."

His Republican opponent set up a facebook group this afternoon and has over 11,000 members. It's gone viral. The entire nation is going to support Stupak's opponent.

8 posted on 03/21/2010 11:24:16 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Stupak is as Stupak does....
9 posted on 03/21/2010 11:24:45 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
Benishek For Congress running against Stupak!!!
10 posted on 03/21/2010 11:26:15 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Or a dirty, cheap, smelly whore that wears a merken.

His church should shun him next time he goes, f*cking rat scum.

Enjoy those ‘regional airport funds’ A.K.A. BRIBES you cheap suit-wearing turd.


11 posted on 03/21/2010 11:26:48 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Welcome to the wonderful world of StupaKare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
His Republican opponent set up a facebook group this afternoon and has over 11,000 members. It's gone viral. The entire nation is going to support Stupak's opponent.

He'll rake in cash by the barrel - like Brown did in MA ...

12 posted on 03/21/2010 11:28:39 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

Does Stupak really think his ridiculous week of “Profiles-In-Courage” posturing, followed by this utter farce of a deal, is actually going to buy him immunity with the hometown rubes?


13 posted on 03/21/2010 11:28:46 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Yep, “stupak” and “clymer”


14 posted on 03/21/2010 11:30:44 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
“stupak” will become a word in common usage meaning an ultimate spineless fraud and hypocrite.

Excellent. I post on religion forums which are swamped with fake Catholics from KOS, MoveON, CAP (and some deluded Democratic Catholics). They will all be "stupaks" from here on out.

15 posted on 03/21/2010 11:30:48 PM PDT by Brugmansian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

He is so stupak.


16 posted on 03/21/2010 11:31:30 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

bttt


17 posted on 03/21/2010 11:32:10 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (Sowell's book, Intellectuals and Society, eviscerates the fantasies that uphold leftist thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The newest hit of the fall season will be “Everybody Hates Stupak.”


18 posted on 03/21/2010 11:32:34 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
Stupak is now urging fellow members to vote it down.

Kind of late for that, now that you have gone out on a limb and sawed it off.

19 posted on 03/21/2010 11:34:39 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

What’s the vote on the rest of it and why is it being kept such a secret at FR? I can’t find it anywhere. Maybe it’s because it’s late and I’m half asleep.


20 posted on 03/21/2010 11:35:02 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson