Posted on 03/24/2010 8:27:41 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan
AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, serving humanity simply by showing up, and he’s not retiring until every American agrees with him, do NOT doubt him, with shrieks of joy at the mere mention of his name (that’s Rush, for those in Rio Linda),the Mandarin of Talk Radio, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back — just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned Maha-Rushie! America’s anchorman, truth detector, and doctor of democracy. A Real Man, a living legend, a way of life. Commander in Chief of U.S. Operation Chaos. Chief Waga-Waga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe. Chief of the Patriotism Police. Leader of the Conservative Movement. A Weapon of Mass Instruction. El Rushbo (a little Spanish lingo, there). He is the man who is running America (you know it and I know it). He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to do—that’s host. Get ready to what you were born to do—that’s listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).
From what I have witnessed, both sides played a part in this agenda, much to my regret.
We knew about the infiltration of the media, courts, education and churches long ago, of course our side would be too.
It’s a dangerous thing.
That means lots of blood will be spilled, one way or another.
JMO
DO THESE PEOPLE LISTEN TO THEMSELVES?????????
(((((((((((((((((HI ANGIE))))))))))))))))))))))))))
The health secretary of the bankrupt government under Obama can't wait for profitable drug companies to lose profit. Ah, health secretary, just where do you think your precious tax revenue comes from? What's next Obama and Dingle are getting the "administrative paperwork prepared" to send us all to the Plantation where they will be able to fully "control" us?
I've got a headache, but I have to pay four more years of exorbitant taxes to get a Obama approved doctor under Obama care to prescribe medication. Oh, master government bureaucrat may I go to the doctor?
-- Wilson (blank for now)
++ Harding-Coolidge-Hoover (blank for now)
-- FDR (and Truman) (blank for now)
++ Ike (blank for now)
-- JFK, all the charisma, correct family background, not enough of a sociopath, not a traitor, ideologue to a certain extent, perhaps a hasty choice to fill in the gap, unwilling to "cooperate"
-- LBJ, placeholder, incremental usefulness (e.g., spinning Fannie Mae off the federal books to hide the debt, etc.)
++ Nixon-Ford (blank for now)
-- Next they tried with Carter, useful and willing tool, too bumbling and not truly evil enough to get things done, definitely a true ideologue (to the depth of his, somewhat limited, understanding), not enough personal charisma, and perhaps not a complete and thorough traitor; was still able to get a few things rolling that have come into play of late (think Community Reinvestment Act, SALT II, stunting Israel, PRC, Dept of Education, Dept of Energy, EPA expansion, etc.) - a lot of seeds planted
++ Bang!, countered by Reagan, set backward by decades
-- Next try, Bill Clinton, much better pol and much, much smarter, an ideologue (but perhaps not a true one, maybe more one of opportunity), had a world of potential but personal flaws (and the awkward relationship with Hill) limited his effectiveness, and perhaps still not a complete and thorough traitor; set more in motion (e.g., Pell Grants, HOPE scholarships, gun control, Family and Medical Leave Act, nuclear disarmament, federal land seizure, provided host environment for Gore, etc.) -- a lot of seed-planting and spade work, while fully claiming democrat credit for the economic bounties enacted by Reagan.
++ GWB, stopped the momentum in some cases, or at least throttled back the rate of expansion
-- Now zero, suitable political skills, right skin color ("white guilt" played a dramatically huge role getting him through the primaries and into place), sufficient level of intellect, a TRUE ideologue (born, raised, and thoroughly crafted), a complete and thorough traitor (that has barely been able to disguise his utter disdain and hatred for this country); and I have been wondering if his "sketchy" background is by design (to be used as a fail-safe or kill switch to be used if needed?)
Sorry for the long winded post here, but I guess what occurred to me is that there has been a very clear and distinct progression over time. There has been a lot of experimentation over time, and each candidate has been designed to overcome the flaws and deficiencies of the prior models. If I get some time I'd like to flesh this out a bit more. Any thoughts?
It meant ‘don’t pick on Obama’ Rush. Wahh wahh wahh.
Can’t demonize Pres. Bush anymore. Back to doing it to Rush.
(((((((((((HI FAWN)))))))))))))))))))))))))
You forgot 41.
I hope you shove this news in his/her face.
Reminds me of a line from a movie:
“Upset? You don’t really want to see me upset.”
CBS, AP => Instead of portraying the truth about Stupak always going to vote for the Health care bill;
posted March 21, 2010
Video: Stupak Has Lied About Healthcare Vote All Along
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2476330/posts
Listen to this video of Bart Stupak recorded last year, when he was unaware he was being recorded.
^
CBS media template
Mar. 24, 2010
Obama To Sign Promised Executive Order On Abortion
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/24/ap/preswho/main6328104.shtml
Obama has invited members of the Democrats’ anti-abortion bloc, including its leader, Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan, to the private afternoon signing at the White House.
^
How incompetent, they are earning their reputation as state run
Did I just hear a two year old throwing a temper tantrum on Rush’s show?
Oh, never mind, just an MSNBC guest.
LOL.
you mean GE....enabler of NBC and QUEERS in your face oh and the leader in global warming fraud...GE is the carbon credit finance windfall you mean that msnbc ?
They’re just doing in Florida what all states are going to have to do to stay solvent.
It’s a good idea, hope it lasts through all the lawsuits.
States should have pension plans. They should let the workers set them up if they want one. If they don’t want one, give them the cash in their paycheck...just don’t want to hear them whine when they retire.
I guess it’ll all be moot when the feds/unions take over 401Ks
bigotocracy? -- Hey, professor! WE don't have to make up a word to describe you guys.
California won’t go along.
Ruth Marcus: Gee, This might not work after all.
In fact, the occasion called for more humility than hyperbole, however unlikely that may have been given the setting. If I were a member of Congress, my floor speech before casting a yes vote would have boiled down to:
Gee, I hope this works.
One of the astonishing aspects of the health-care debate is how little is actually known about the implications of a change this far-reaching. Everyone has a theory, and a model to match, but even some of the most fundamental questions remain the subject of debate.
On the most basic of all — does having health insurance lead to better health? — the evidence is solid but not unanimous. The Institute of Medicine, reviewing the literature in 2009, found that “the body of evidence on the health consequences of health insurance is stronger than ever before. . . . Simply stated: Health insurance coverage matters.”
But a study that same year by Richard Kronick, a former health-care adviser to President Bill Clinton, found “little evidence to suggest that extending insurance coverage to all adults would have a large effect on the number of deaths in the United States.” Kronick’s study has been criticized because it did not adjust for the fact that those in poor health are more likely to seek insurance. But the disagreement underscores the difficulty of knowing precisely what changes are in store.
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/299786.php
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.