Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AT&T, Deere CEOs Called by Waxman to Back Up Health-Bill Costs (Rats don't like the consequences)
Business Week ^ | 3/27/2010 | Viola Gienger

Posted on 03/28/2010 4:28:51 AM PDT by tobyhill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: tobyhill

Seems the truth is about to be banned in the USA.


61 posted on 03/28/2010 5:53:49 AM PDT by Carley (Are you better off than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meia

You are wrong and so is your source. The company got a deduction for the $720,000. They didn’t have to declare the $280,000 as income.

The $280,000 will now be treated as income to the corporation, raising their taxable income.

This is sort of like you having to declare a tax refund you get one year as income the next and paying tax on it.

The next action by Obama - cut the $280,000 the corporation gets and then the retirees will be dumped on medicare. Corporations will report a large gain on their books as the liability ceases and Obama will gloat that his change made companies more profitable without talking about how medicare is now responsible for 100% of the cost.


62 posted on 03/28/2010 5:54:26 AM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Yes congressman as soon as you provide proof of the veracity of every sentence in the law. You first


63 posted on 03/28/2010 5:57:46 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Verizon does not like it too. Plus Verizon is challenging the FCC grab for the Internet. When Verizon purchased MCI they got UUNET which is about 85% of the entire Internet. However, the Feds now want to say it’s in their control (Kind of Like GM) and Verizon saying no freaking way. Should be interesting to see how it plays out in the courts.
64 posted on 03/28/2010 5:57:47 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Will HC cost us Saved Jobs or New Jobs?

Pray for America


65 posted on 03/28/2010 5:59:45 AM PDT by bray (Throw All the Bums Out, starting with McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

General Motors dropped its retiree prescription plan for union members.


66 posted on 03/28/2010 6:01:04 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Giant Gila Monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Waxman, why don’t you and your fellow pirates just pass a law making criticism of the health “reform” bill a criminal offense?


67 posted on 03/28/2010 6:02:16 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raygun
The Dems were hoping their house of cards would hold up through the November elections and not come crashing down until the first part of next year.

They don't like this news because it puts the lie to everything they've been preaching.

68 posted on 03/28/2010 6:02:40 AM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

You are wrong, and you have no source.


69 posted on 03/28/2010 6:03:33 AM PDT by meia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Now we have congress telling companies to hide their expenses and lie to shareholders?


70 posted on 03/28/2010 6:06:55 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

We’ll see about house of cards coming crashing down.

I quite talking to people about this stuff. I can’t afford it no more. I warned everybody before the election.

All I heard was “I don’t know what he’s ahout.” When I inquired if they do, I was told I was a racist.

So. The only option they have is to believe the dream; There is NO other option. For if they contemplate the spawn from hell that they helped sire, the only option is for them to eat the gun. They must and will believe the dream; they’ve all taken the blue pill.

Mark my words well.


71 posted on 03/28/2010 6:10:22 AM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Adder

I can’t stand Henry Nostril man. He’s a control freak...


72 posted on 03/28/2010 6:14:57 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
This is sort of like you having to declare a tax refund you get one year as income the next and paying tax on it.

...The next action by Obama - cut the $280,000 the corporation gets and then the retirees will be dumped on medicare

Your analogy is absurd. The subsidy given to AT&T and the other corporations is not a tax refund. It is money provided by the taxpayers to help pay for drug prescriptions for their employees.

And then you state that the government is going to cut the subsidy out when it is clearly still a part of the HCR package that was just passed. Let's deal only in facts, not opinions.

73 posted on 03/28/2010 6:16:54 AM PDT by meia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JeanLM
Ummm....... Other than skin pigmentation, what is his “strong suit”.

He excels at lies and deceit.....

74 posted on 03/28/2010 6:17:03 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

What if they held an inquisition and nobody showed up?


75 posted on 03/28/2010 6:19:05 AM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meia

If you took a $10,000 charitable deduction on your tax return and as a result obtained a $3,000 tax refund, would you adhere to the idea that you should be reporting that $3,000 tax refund as income to you in that same tax year?

That is a simple analogy to what you are ascribing to when you align yourself with an article written by a person who wants to make this sound as though something sinister is at work.

No doubt you also were campaigning for making cash paid to citizens under Cash For Clunkers as taxable income also.....because it would make as much sense as what you just ascribed to.


76 posted on 03/28/2010 6:20:14 AM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Waxman lies about the cost of ZerOcare, but, when the true cost comes out he wants to demagogue the CEOs to backup his lies. If the companies back off they will be sued for not disclosing the cost or prosecuted for not paying enough. At the moment it really is not worth doing business in this country.


77 posted on 03/28/2010 6:20:16 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (Tea parties today, Lexington tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
you’re going to LIKE it.

And if you say you don't, we want to see your internal communications and have you testify. A brave new (not so new, really) world.

78 posted on 03/28/2010 6:20:32 AM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
I think what's going on is that these companies are ready to dump health insurance for their employees and take the fines instead. The fines are much cheaper than the insurance.

The fines would have to be paid right up front whereas the savings from not having to pay for their insurance comes at the end of the fiscal year and that's where the write-off is.

This is the BOTTOM Line. Many companies are going to correctly determine it is simply a better business move to drop employee health care and pay the $750 to $3,000 fine per employee.

Many of us at FedEx were discussing this issue. There are about 135,000 FedEx employees in the USA. We figure conservatively FedEx pays out maybe $500mm annually for health care and medicine costs for the U.S. based employees.

Do the math. Even if the cost is $3,000 per employee, that cost is $405,000,000. That is a SAVINGS to FedEx's bottom line of nearly $100,000,000.

If you think about it, it is brilliant on High Priest Obama's part. He is DELIBERATELY making it punative for private companies to continue to provide health coverage as a primary benefit.

Imagine if FedEx, Caterpillar, Cisco, AT&T, Ford, Ford, and other huge multinational corporations simply push all of their U.S. based employees into ObamaCare. That HELPS further the control factor Obama seeks; more citizens forced into this program.

79 posted on 03/28/2010 6:22:34 AM PDT by boss man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
If you took a $10,000 charitable deduction on your tax return and as a result obtained a $3,000 tax refund, would you adhere to the idea that you should be reporting that $3,000 tax refund as income to you in that same tax year?

Why do you insist on calling this subsidy that is provided by the taxpayers to help pay for drug costs a "Tax Refund"? It is nothing of the sort. The government is paying for 28% of the cost of the drug benefits of their employees. They are not refunding any taxes!! And no matter how many times you call it a tax rebate, it will not change the facts.

80 posted on 03/28/2010 6:28:46 AM PDT by meia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson