Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ark. Senate candidate questions Obama citizenship
R&D mag ^ | 3/24/10 | Andy Demillo

Posted on 03/29/2010 7:07:33 PM PDT by pissant

A Republican running for a Senate seat in Arkansas on Wednesday said he didn't know whether President Barack Obama is a natural-born citizen, despite proof that's been provided by the president and the state of Hawaii.

Curtis Coleman, a North Little Rock businessman, said he thinks the president should be forced to produce his birth certificate. Hawaii officials have issued multiple statements saying records prove Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen, and Obama's campaign posted a copy of his birth certificate on its Web site during the 2008 presidential race.

Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961 to an American mother and a Kenyan father.

(Excerpt) Read more at rdmag.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: arkansas; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; citizen; citizenship; larrysinclairslover; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamaisabirther
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
The marxist bastard is not who he pretends he is.
1 posted on 03/29/2010 7:07:33 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant
Obama was allegedly born in Hawaii in 1961 to an American mother and a Kenyan father.

There, fixed it.

2 posted on 03/29/2010 7:13:04 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
But, he's got great PR people, like the AP.

Notice any inaccuracies from this article?

“Hawaii officials have issued multiple statements saying records prove Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen, and Obama’s campaign posted a copy of his birth certificate on its Web site during the 2008 presidential race.”

3 posted on 03/29/2010 7:13:13 PM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
despite proof that's been provided by the president and the state of Hawaii

An image posted on a website is not legal proof of anything.

If the state of Hawaii were to provide a certified copy of his birth certificate to a court of law in a legal proceeding, that would be considered real evidence.

But Obama has had lawyers in dozens of cases arguing there is no legal requirement to have to submit such a document.

Hawaii has only confirmed it has documents relating to Obama in their files. We don't know what they say, because Obama has not consented to allowing Hawaii to releasing that information.

4 posted on 03/29/2010 7:14:18 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
posted a copy of his birth certificate

I read the item mentioned when it was first posted during the election. At that time, the posting itself claimed that the item was an "abstract." An abstract is not a copy of an original. It is a summary of an original. And THAT is a huge difference.

5 posted on 03/29/2010 7:15:10 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

And the fact that the summary was a forgery doesn’t help much either.


6 posted on 03/29/2010 7:15:58 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The focus on eligibility continues to grow.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/28/demand-issued-to-nevada-governor-for-proof-of-obamas-eligibility/

Demand issued to Nevada Governor for proof of Obama’s Eligibility
Gino Disimone, Independent candidate for Nevada Governor, demands that Governor Jim Gibbons “Immediately take action” to determine Obama’s eligibility to serve as president.


7 posted on 03/29/2010 7:17:55 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith

I agree with Gino


8 posted on 03/29/2010 7:18:37 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No proof has been provided. More lies from the media. This guy needs to win if he has these guts.


9 posted on 03/29/2010 7:18:59 PM PDT by Frantzie (McCain=Obama's friend. McCain called AMERICANS against amnesty - "racists")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

I am not aware of any such official statement issued by Hawaii officials.


10 posted on 03/29/2010 7:19:46 PM PDT by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts soooo good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Truth is a Weapon

Not to mention his campaign posted his birth certificate.

That’s news to me.


11 posted on 03/29/2010 7:21:19 PM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Just more catechism from another associated pimp for Obama.
http://www.spoke.com/info/p2rLLYq/AndrewDeMillo


12 posted on 03/29/2010 7:24:53 PM PDT by tumblindice ("We'll call it a `command & control' economy!" Harry "The NRA Loves Me!" Reid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

What sentient American does not?


13 posted on 03/29/2010 7:29:16 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“...despite proof that’s been provided by the president and the state of Hawaii.”

What proof?

Obama has NEVER presented, to the U.S. public, his long-form birth certificate proving birht in Hawaii.

As for anyone else claiming to have seen his BC, I say prove it - publicly present the long-form Hawaiian BC.


14 posted on 03/29/2010 7:30:29 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

From what the DOH has said already we know that what they have doesn’t qualify as prima facie evidence. And the logical explanation of further things they’ve said is that his birth certificate was not completed until 2006 when Obama provided a document which gave the missing info - and the only reason for the info to be missing was that neither Obama nor his mother were in Hawaii to have a doctor complete the certificate.

IOW, what Hawaii has certainly doesn’t prove a Hawaii birth - and very likely DISPROVES a Hawaii birth.


15 posted on 03/29/2010 7:31:04 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report
"The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii
In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were four different ways to get an “original birth certificate” on record.
BC1. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).

BC2. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then all that was required was that one of the parents send in a birth certificate to be filed. The birth certificate could be filed by mail. There appears to have been no requirement for the parent to actually physically appear before “the local registrar of the district.”
It would have been very easy for a relative to forge an absent parent’s signature to a form and mail it in.
In addition, if a claim was made that “neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.” (Section 57-8&9)
.... there is and was no requirement for a physician or midwife to witness, state or report that the baby was born in Hawaii.

BC3. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, a “Delayed Certificate” could be filed, which required that “a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing or the alteration [of a file] shall be endorsed on the certificates”, which “evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.”
The statute provided that “the probative value of a ‘delayed’ or ‘altered’ certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.” (See Section 57- 9, 18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).”

BC4. If a child is born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person [i.e. the birth child as an adult]) if the Office of the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year.
(See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961.)
In 1955 the “secretary of the Territory” was in charge of this procedure. In 1960 it was transferred to the Office of the Lieutenant Governor (“the lieutenant governor, or his secretary, or such other person as he may designate or appoint from his office” §338-41 [in 1961]).

In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of “original birth certificate”. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82, “Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that the proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.”
In this way “state policies and procedures” accommodate even “children born out of State” (this is the actual language of Act 182) with an “original birth certificate on record.”

THE COVERUP

Proof of DNC Corruption ignored by DOJ and SCOTUS
=========================================

Altered voting certificates by Pelosi for election fraud for the DNC

Exhibit 1: (the original, but discarded) states:
”THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the
United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the
following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice
President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President
and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions
of the United States Constitution:”



Exhibit 2: specifically leaves out the qualifying requirement:
”THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the
United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the
following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice
President of the United States respectively:”


Exhibit 3: More altered documents where the natural born requirement
Check off box … was removed.


“D.C. Tech Official Is Accused of Bribery(Birth Certificate Forgery)
A D.C. government official and a business executive were arrested yesterday on bribery
charges involving city technology contracts that included "ghost" workers and
kickbacks, federal authorities said. Until recently, the technology office was headed
by Vivek Kundra, who has taken a job as President Obama's chief information officer.
A White House official confirmed last night that Kundra has taken a leave of absence.
“Yusuf Acar, 40, who has worked in the technology office since 2004, was charged with
bribery, conspiracy, money laundering and conflict of interest.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Hibarger told a federal judge that Acar is a flight risk because agents
seized $70,000 in cash in his house and because in recorded conversations, he boasted that he could easily flee to his native Turkey.
Acar also told the informant that he could use
computers to create fake D.C. birth certificates, Hibarger said. “

16 posted on 03/29/2010 7:34:02 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xzins; pissant; Rational Thought

Apparently officials now state there is nothing to back up Fukino’s claims about Obama’s birth records.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/28/hi-ag-denies-having-information-supporting-department-of-health-claim/

HI AG denies having information supporting Department of Health claim
ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK BENNETT’S OFFICE SAYS THEY HAVE “NO GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE PREPARATION OF THE PUBLIC STATEMENTS MADE BY DR. FUKINO”


17 posted on 03/29/2010 7:40:54 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Faith

So she pulled the non-affirming “affirmation” language out of her bunghole, it appears.


18 posted on 03/29/2010 7:45:49 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961 to an American mother and a Kenyan father.”

YOU ARE WRONG! How stupid are you? Don’t you have a brain in your head?

Obama, Jr. has A BRITISH FATHER who lived in the British Colony of KENYA! 1948 British Nationality Act mades Obama, Jr. A BRITISH CITIZEN at birth!

Do your homework of shut the “F” up!


19 posted on 03/29/2010 7:53:41 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

From the article:

As the attorney general claims it has “no government documents pertaining to the preparation of the public statements made by Dr. Fukino in regard to vital records which pertain to Barack Hussein Obama II,” then either the attorney general is lying and breaking the law, or Dr. Fukino and Janice Okubo are.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/28/hi-ag-denies-having-information-supporting-department-of-health-claim/


20 posted on 03/29/2010 8:02:43 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson