Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Growing 'Frustration' With Steele Inside RNC
Fox News ^ | 3/30/2010 | Jake Gibson

Posted on 03/30/2010 3:50:04 PM PDT by iowamark

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele “allowed a certain climate to exist” that resulted in the committee paying for a now infamous visit to a Los Angeles strip club, a senior RNC committeeman tells Fox News.

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele "allowed a certain climate to exist" that resulted in the committee paying for a now infamous visit to a Los Angeles strip club, a senior RNC committeeman told Fox News.

Steele's critics point to the strip club story as another in a series of controversies in which his leadership has been found wanting. The chairman's office has rejected such flak as unwarranted by the facts in the case. RNC spokesman Doug Heye also points out that Steele was not at Voyeur, did not have any knowledge of the expenditure and finds the use of committee funds at such a location unacceptable.

Publicly filed documents revealed this week that a Republican donor, Erik Brown, had been permitted to charge the RNC for a $1,946 visit last February to the Los Angeles strip club Voyeur. In response to the disclosure, the RNC Tuesday fired staffer Allison Meyers, the director of the committee's "Young Eagles" program. It was Meyers who turned in the receipt as an expense...

Steele also controversially said on a cable talk show he thought some Republicans were "afraid of black people"...

"For the first time I can remember, we have less cash on hand than the Democrats, and that's the real crime here, we should be spending our money more wisely." said one well placed Republican source....

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: michaelsteele; rnc; steele
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Jagman

It just may be that “our black guy” thinks that he can do the same stupid stuff as the dims do and be approved but finds that conservatives actually have standards and believe that everyone, yes, even blacks, need to abide by them.


21 posted on 03/30/2010 4:31:51 PM PDT by zerosix (native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe; Jagman

Agree as well. Steele was appointed DUE to skin color and also due to pc RINOS that graze the GOP halls. I vote to kick him out now.


22 posted on 03/30/2010 4:32:18 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PackerBoy
When Steele eventually goes, and he will, I predict he will (1) whine about racism, (2) becomes even more supportive of the Dems, and (3) write a book about the “far right wing wackos such as Tea Partiers”” taking over the GOP.

Correct on all 3 points. As a matter of fact, he's to an extent done all 3 things already. He's whined about racism the last time his nutty behavior was called into question, he attacked Rush after he took office using terms similar to "far right wing wackos”{ Steele called Rush "ugly," "incendiary"}, and he's already written a book which hs eodnds more time selling than actually running the RNC. This whole RNC dig is all about feathering Micheal Steel's nest and filling his pockets.

23 posted on 03/30/2010 4:34:28 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

That isn’t PC, but when you say he’s “our black guy” is just stupid and it does come across racist. There are plenty of things to dislike about him but comparing him to Obama because he’s black is stupid and irrelevant.

If you are white I guess that means we should/can compare you to hitler.


24 posted on 03/30/2010 4:43:18 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I agree he will say it’s because of race and some of the posts in this thread are making it easy for him to claim that.


25 posted on 03/30/2010 4:44:37 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

How is that racist? I simply said two black guys were inept, not ALL black guys, which would be racist. Actually, I think your kneejerk mention of Justice Thomas as an example of a “good” black guy was extremely racist. Shame on you!


26 posted on 03/30/2010 5:14:18 PM PDT by Jagman (End income inequality: cut gov worker pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

It’s racist now to say “our black guy”?


27 posted on 03/30/2010 5:18:44 PM PDT by Osage Orange (A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
As a former (thank God) resident of Maryland, myself and many others (Marylanders) at the time tried to stem the “Ohhhh, he's black guy and a conservative, he's so cool, aren't we lucky to have a black conservative on our side to counter the democrats, blah, blah, blah”. We tried to tell you all that Steele was NEVER a conservative, he was and remains a moderate to liberal “Republican”.

He was nominated by Bob Ehrlich as a ploy to get the black vote in Baltimore and Prince George's county. It worked and Ehrlich (who by-the-way IS NOT a conservative and looking currently to run for office again)won one term.

Ehrlich tried the same ploy again when Steele started to believe his own propaganda and opted to run for Congress and not for Lt. Governor again. Steele lost. Ehrlich nominated a legally blind white woman as Lt. Governor. Ehrlich lost.

We tried to tell you, but no, no one wanted to believe us then. Now, I am telling you. When Ehrlich announces for some office, don't go all ga-ga. Ehrlich is an establishment RINO as was and still is Steele.

28 posted on 03/30/2010 5:27:32 PM PDT by alarm rider (The left will always tell you who they fear the most. What are they telling you now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

He didn’t say anything racist. Steele and Obama are both black.


29 posted on 03/30/2010 5:30:52 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

That Steele’s rehiring would even be considered as a possibility is appalling to me.


30 posted on 03/30/2010 5:31:47 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider; Steve Schulin

Thank God for all of those like yourself who see so clearly.


31 posted on 03/30/2010 5:32:16 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

Because it was “OUR” black guy as if we own him


32 posted on 03/30/2010 5:35:27 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Are you now or have you ever been a liberal? You’re out of your gourd. And, by your admittedly stupid standard, you yourself are a racist for mentioning Thomas as OUR implied black guy. I’d quit while I was behind.


33 posted on 03/30/2010 5:40:51 PM PDT by Jagman (End income inequality: cut gov worker pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

You can say whatever you like, and you can review my posting history. Stupid comments like “our black guy vs. their black guy” is a racist comment. Yes it’s not as obvious as saying our N vs. their N, but it pretty much implies the same thing.

Ever been to mississippi? I was on honor guard for the Air Force as the OIC for the funeral once in the early 90s and the guy referred to the black workers as “his blacks” and yes it was obvious what he meant.


34 posted on 03/30/2010 5:52:38 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
You are wrong, wrong, wrong, and you are a danger to this site. People like you see racism everywhere, and apparently actively seek it out where it isn't. And whether you like it or not, he IS our guy; not in the ridiculous fashion you suggest, but because we are stuck with him, who was thrust into a position he clearly wasn't prepared for because some genius in the RNC thought he would be a good response to the first black president. You are a self righteous fool.
35 posted on 03/30/2010 6:07:36 PM PDT by Jagman (End income inequality: cut gov worker pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

And you are a racist idiot. Now that we got the name calling out of the way if you don’t have anything constructive to say let’s just agree to disagree and not litter this forum up with the trash.


36 posted on 03/30/2010 6:18:51 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Two final points, and then I hope never to hear from you again:

1. You started the name calling with your first post to me.

2. I would never in a million years have thought to bring up Justice Thomas in the context of this discussion. Why did you? I can only assume you're heart may not be as pure as all of your self righteous posturing would have us believe.

37 posted on 03/31/2010 3:48:08 AM PDT by Jagman (End income inequality: cut gov worker pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

Sorry I can’t let you let such false statement stands. You need to re-read the posts (as I just did). I didn’t call you a name...the only thing I stated was a statement of fact that your comment was racist. It doesn’t mean you are a racist.

So please show me where I resorted to name calling prior to your two name calling posts. And don’t worry many people resort to name calling once they lose an argument. Bill Clinton and the left did it all the time when he was being called out for his shananigans. It’s a typical method to try and “win” a lost cause. Typically you should attack the facts, but if you can’t then attack the message, and if that fails attack the person. At least by your resorting to name calling I see you admit the comment was a racist one. Thank you for making my point for me.


38 posted on 03/31/2010 6:01:32 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson