Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

>>Our “lawful Lord and King George III”?!?!?!?!
>
>By what law was that insipid man our King? By English law alone. We live by American law.

But at that time we WERE English Subjects.
[This isn’t saying that I don’t agree with the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution, but to retroactively apply laws in an argument is a VERY grave folly; it is for this reason that I despise the Nurmburg trials where the “War Crime” was invented and retroactively applied... there was enough evidence to convict of [reular] murder those who were complicit.]


312 posted on 03/31/2010 6:17:15 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark
England thought we were subjects. We thought we should be independent. Most of our founders disagreed fundamentally with the “Divine right of Kings”.
320 posted on 03/31/2010 6:19:26 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson