Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TitansAFC

Slaves were becoming less valuable economically. Machines were starting to replace human labor, and had considerable benefits. They didn’t get sick and die, nor runaway; you only had to feed them when in use. Slavery would have died out in time when it simply became financially advantageous to mechanize the labor. Mechanized farming would have ended slavery just the same as it replaced horses and mules.


86 posted on 03/31/2010 3:46:56 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Second Amendment First
Here, here. First one to bring up this point.

Link to time line of mechanized farming in America.

http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blfarm1.htm

Rather than buying the slaves, the north should have offered discount pricing on mechanized farming equipment to southern farmers. This would have killed off slavery faster than anything else.

The reasons the south was using slaves was because, at the time, it was the cheapest way to farm. Give them a cheaper way to farm and what need would they have for slaves?

144 posted on 03/31/2010 4:20:21 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson