Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sestak says White House has contacted his brother over job-offer allegation
Washington Post ^ | May 27 2010 | Paul Kane

Posted on 05/27/2010 6:12:43 PM PDT by malkee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-207 next last
To: rcrngroup

You haven’t heard Issa when he rips
many who come before his commitee.

He was investigating ACORN before the popular culture folks
knew what it was.


141 posted on 05/27/2010 9:12:01 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
My point is your reference in post 133.

"within a week of Adm. Michael Mullen’s swearing-in as chief of naval operations - Sestak was dismissed as deputy chief of naval operations due to a “poor command climate,” according to the Navy Times."

Do you see a pattern here? Mullen fired him and now "happens" to be the only pro-homosexual on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and happens to be the decider on tomorrows vote after the Congress.

142 posted on 05/27/2010 9:12:34 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

That sums up Sestak.
Like Wesley Clark he is a Bill Clinton boy


143 posted on 05/27/2010 9:16:29 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

And that thread was from ‘06.


144 posted on 05/27/2010 9:21:40 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Interesting play out.


145 posted on 05/27/2010 9:21:45 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

Nice catch!


146 posted on 05/27/2010 9:25:55 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

If Obama can throw Sestak under the bus he will go pieces first. Sestak will be the focus of the take-down. It isn’t the first time he has met this.


147 posted on 05/27/2010 9:29:00 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol; Madame Dufarge

Actually, Madame caught it. I was doing an off-FR search on Able Danger and how to erase 0 from the net (FR lost a lot of stuff over a few severe server melts) but google cached it.

Madame went through the Able Danger links and found it.


148 posted on 05/27/2010 9:32:18 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

and Obama is losing some of his media suppport along with
some of the pols in his party.
At some point, Obama is going to have to stop
the blame game


149 posted on 05/27/2010 9:33:58 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

All of it is relevant, but Sestak seems to be completely breaking away from Obama. If he was offered a position to stop his campaign against Spector then we have a felony. A whistle-blower from the inside is not what Obama can handle.


150 posted on 05/27/2010 9:38:06 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

The problem is can you prove it?

If both parties deny it took place what actual evidence is there to convict someone?


151 posted on 05/27/2010 9:48:56 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: malkee
"I think the president's a pretty legitimate, you know, person," he said.

Yep. We know. He is not pretty nor legitimate.

152 posted on 05/27/2010 9:49:12 PM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has it limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez

“I think the president’s a pretty legitimate, you know, person,” he said.
Yep. We know. He is not pretty nor legitimate. “

LOL. You beat me to it. What a line..from Sestak and from you.


153 posted on 05/27/2010 9:53:10 PM PDT by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--more than three years now -- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: DB

They are guilty by their own admissions. It’s called a statement against interest. Sestak stated what happened and no one in the Obama administration has denied it happened; and now Sestak’s brother comes out and admits he was just contacted by the White House.

There is plenty of evidence.


154 posted on 05/27/2010 9:53:15 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
Sorry, “contacted” by the White House means mostly zip in terms of a prosecution unless someone has evidence of what was said. If both parties swear that the conversation was about the price of tea in China and there's no proof otherwise you have zip.

Sestak: “And on further reflection I misunderstood what the White House was saying. In fact they were saying that if the election doesn't go my way they had a job opening for me...”

End of story with no independent evidence. I'm not saying it is right. I just saying this is what to expect.

155 posted on 05/27/2010 10:02:51 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

All of it is relevant, but Sestak seems to be completely breaking away from Obama. If he was offered a position to stop his campaign against Spector then we have a felony. A whistle-blower from the inside is not what Obama can handle.


As the Clintons planned. 0 is the wrong kind of Chicago, for them. He brings too much crazy to the rat powers that be. He’s used up about 94% of the useful idiot he can provide them, delivering the vote for rat power consolidation.

That’s why 0 fears Sarah: he’s been lead to believe his whole life that that America doesn’t know what is good for America. Only wealth re-distributors know what America needs.

Like Rush said today, Thank You George Bush for causing European socialism to collapse.


156 posted on 05/27/2010 10:06:05 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: DB

If Sestak was preparing to adhere to the party line I don’t think he’d be telling everybody about his brother’s conversation with Obama.


157 posted on 05/27/2010 10:06:07 PM PDT by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--more than three years now -- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: malkee
Sestak seems to have a big mouth period.

Hard to say what the implies.

158 posted on 05/27/2010 10:07:35 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: DB

And the Washington Post,too. I was impressed. :)


159 posted on 05/27/2010 10:08:47 PM PDT by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--more than three years now -- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Dionysius

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/05/the_senator_from_sandy_berger.html

Here’s a link that will tell you all you need to know. Weldon was my Congressman. I will not rest until Sestak is FINISHED.


160 posted on 05/27/2010 10:09:29 PM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson