Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Republican: Raise Social Security's retirement age to 70
The Hill ^

Posted on 06/29/2010 8:23:18 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Top Republican: Raise Social Security's retirement age to 70 By Michael O'Brien - 06/29/10 10:50 AM ET

A Republican-held Congress might look to raise the retirement age to 70, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) suggested Monday.

Boehner, the top Republican lawmaker in the House, said that raising the retirement age by five year, indexing benefits to the rate of inflation and means-testing benefits would make the massive entitlement program more solvent.

"We're all living a lot longer than anyone ever expected," Boehner said in a meeting with the editors of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. "And I think that raising the retirement age -- going out 20 years, so you're not affecting anyone close to retirement -- and eventually getting the retirement age to 70 is a step that needs to be taken."

The GOP leader said that Social Security was the most important entitlement to reform, though he also pledged that Republicans would bring legislation to the floor to repeal and replace the healthcare reforms passed earlier this year if the GOP wins back control of the House this fall.

But Boehner also floated several other reforms to Social Security, paired with raising the retirement age, to make it more solvent. Boehner said that benefits should be tied to increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) instead of wage inflation, and he suggested reducing or eliminating benefits to Americans with a "substantial non-Social Security income" while retired.

"We just need to be honest with people," he said. "I'm not suggesting it's going to be easy, but I think if we did those three things, you'd pretty well solve the problem."

Republican have made cutting spending and reforming entitlement programs a key part of their 2010 campaign message.

Watch the entirety of Boehner's explanation below:


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boehner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last
The Dems will use this as ammo.........
1 posted on 06/29/2010 8:23:19 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’m all for it. we’re living longer and healthier. adjust to the times.


2 posted on 06/29/2010 8:24:35 AM PDT by Ancient Drive (DRINK COFFEE! - Do Stupid Things Faster with More Energy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

3 generations ago, “retirement” was a rare luxury

we have forgotten and been lulled


3 posted on 06/29/2010 8:25:22 AM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"The Dems will use this as ammo.........

Which is why this problem will never be solved leading to Social Security's unavoidable insolvency, which in my estimation is EXACTLY what the Dems want. They want to replace Social Security with a more comprehensive cradle-to-grave social program, and they'll do it out of the chaos of a failed Social Security.

4 posted on 06/29/2010 8:26:07 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Republicans need to clear out 90% of the Social Security “disability” payments. It’s going to the same folks who used to get welfare - but now don’t have to keep having kids to stay on for life. Also, the moochers undermine the program for those who really are disabled.


5 posted on 06/29/2010 8:26:21 AM PDT by GOPJ (More people are killed every year by falling vending machines than by holders of concealed-weapons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

End it gradually. Let those who are 20+ years out get out of this ponzi scheme.


6 posted on 06/29/2010 8:27:42 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If I am able to do so, I’m going to take mine at 62. And run away with the money. :)


7 posted on 06/29/2010 8:27:52 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
As long as I can remember, every blue ribbon commission appointed to come up with a plan to save Social Security has recommended this, within the mix.
8 posted on 06/29/2010 8:28:04 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I have an idea!

Let me keep my own damn money and I'll retire when I want to retire! Sheeze...


9 posted on 06/29/2010 8:28:26 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Boehner should be cheered for having the guts to recommend this.

Instead he and all Republicans will be vilified.


10 posted on 06/29/2010 8:28:31 AM PDT by eCSMaster (He promised hope; he gave us hype. He promised change; he gave us chains!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And what are those laid off over 60 workers who have been contributing all their lives (nay, FORCED TO CONTRIBUTE) going to do for the meantime ?

Try finding a job at that age after you have been laid off (often because of your age).

Why not try something else — LIKE STOPPING THE RAID OF SOCIAL SECURITY TO PAY FOR CURRENT BUDGET EXPENSES.

We’ve been talking about the lockbox since Al Gore made the term a comedy signature at SNL, but we have not even implemented it.


11 posted on 06/29/2010 8:28:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Means-testing would be a brutal betrayal of the tax-paying middle class. Forget it. Tweaking the eligibility schedule and regular increases makes sense.


12 posted on 06/29/2010 8:28:58 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I actually have no problem with this...HOWEVER...the fact that the Social Security system has been over-promised for years presents a problem....plus the fact that there is NO LOCK BOX for the funds...they’ve used them! er...they’ve STOLEN the funds!


13 posted on 06/29/2010 8:29:12 AM PDT by goodnesswins (DEMOCRATS LOSE.....America WINS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

When SS was first instituted the average life expactancy was 62 (women) and 56 (men) [I may be off a couple 0of years- I am going from my mory- but the point is] Social Security kicked in at age 65 - so no one was expected to collect on it, it was a MONEY GRAB

Then when people started living longer, it became a VOTING BLOCK

I feel no sympathy for oldsters who voted themselves their grand-childrens money

Hey! Why dont we just LOAN OURSELVES $10 trillion dollars- payable in the year 3000 (let THEM worry about it)


14 posted on 06/29/2010 8:29:16 AM PDT by Mr. K (Physically unable to proofread- I swear I try!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Boner is a total idiot. This loses the Elderly and babyboom vote. He cut our nuts off. The GOP is full of morons and losers...
15 posted on 06/29/2010 8:29:23 AM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

If they means test it, Sosha Security will become just another welfare program.


16 posted on 06/29/2010 8:29:26 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hopefully most of these people will die before they ever get the money government confiscated from them, then looted the fund...

That's what this is all about.

17 posted on 06/29/2010 8:29:34 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Boehner has the rare and exceptional gift of saying the exact wrong thing at the exact wrong time based upon the exact wrong plan.


18 posted on 06/29/2010 8:29:34 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

at the time social security was implemented the average life expediency was 65 to raise the age only five years will not be enough, we need the defined contribution model with individual oversight,yes good ‘ol personal responsibility!
Yeah there are those who hate that stuff!


19 posted on 06/29/2010 8:29:37 AM PDT by mtnjimmi ("The government is best which governs least." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hell, raise it to 120.

I wonder what fraction of SS outlays is for people UNDER the retirement age. SSI, surviving spouses, etc.

20 posted on 06/29/2010 8:30:14 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson