[Venturer]

They turn down your case because Obama is “The Won”, then they want you to show cause why you brought the case.

MAYBE IF THEY LISTENED TO THE CASE THEY WOULD SEE THE CAUSE.

[BuckeyeTexan]

MAYBE IF THEY LISTENED TO THE CASE THEY WOULD SEE THE CAUSE

That's a knee-jerk response. You should read the full decision. It is very clear that the 3rd Circuit Panel did "listen." They read and considered the briefs, cited each of the appellants' claims in their response, and took care to respond to each claim (citing precedents for their decisions) and even acknowledged the appellants' frustration with the whole process.

[Non-Sequitur]

MAYBE IF THEY LISTENED TO THE CASE THEY WOULD SEE THE CAUSE.

Maybe if they had a case the court would listen to it?

[Seizethecarp]

“Plaintiffs’ claims fall squarely into the category of generalized grievances that are most appropriately handled by the legislative branch. The Court acknowledges Plaintiffs’ frustration with what they perceive as Congress’ inaction in this area, but their remedy may be found through their vote.
Id. at 483 n.5. We agree.”

WOW!

I read this to mean:

The Court (the District Court) acknowledges Plaintiffs’ frustration with what they perceive as Congress’ inaction in this area (clarifying Obama’s constitutional NBC status). We (3rd Circuit Appeals court) agree.

In other words, the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court agrees with the District Court's frustration with Congress’ inaction in failing to clarify Obama’s constitutional NBC status.