Posted on 07/06/2010 4:56:18 PM PDT by cryptical
Hey man, you back or just pass’n through?
its ole 2.5, the GOA hating NRA member
Here is a thread where you spewed your typical, and not very enlightened rant, without listening to a word someone else says Typical 2.5 whining rant about the GOA.
and here you are in another thread and using your typical whining rant with me 2.5 gets the real facts and then gets caught in a couple of, well lets say... factual distortions.
And yet again, after being confronted with facts defeating your position you continue to defend the indefensible.
So after getting your butt severely kicked to the curb many times, you continue to resort to distortions, twisting everyones words and in some cases; out right lying about your actions in an attempt to defend your pitifully weak bias.
Even so, I tried to reach out over a year after you told your usual fibs and help you see the error of your non-question, but you again went back to your old ways of unfairly attacking fellow 2A groups.
Many people have answered your stupid questions and countered your stands innumerous times you just refuse to see it. Point is, if you cant have an honest debate fighting a common enemy, then do everyone else a favor stay on the sidelines and argue with yourself, dont try to distort the focus of this fight.
Every 2A group, no matter what you may think of them should be WELCOMED to the struggle we are facing, many former NRA members, myself included, who definitely have no love for the NRA leadership have been going back into the group because the stakes are so high, dont let your petty bias cloud the big picture.
AOV sends with warmest regards.
ping
Notice the case is not “NRA v. Chicago” but “Benson v. Chicago”. Just like the NRA was AWOL on Heller and McDonald.
Kind of makes you wonder why it takes private citizens and private funding to bring these most important cases.
Where is all that money the NRA getting from members going if it is not paying for these lawsuits?
Heh.....I’ll start giving money to the NRA regularly when we get 922 (o) overturned.
You do realize that the bill must pass in the Senate too..right? NRA supporting Reid, is a way to get the bill done.
Sounds like a theory, but it doesn't really fit the facts. Nice try linking the two separate issues into one, though.
“...Notice the case is not NRA v. Chicago but Benson v. Chicago.
Just like the NRA was AWOL on Heller and McDonald...”
-
The “NRA” does not have “standing”, but a “citizen” does.
“The government should buy everyone guns.
Actually, I could get behind that! It seems to work well for Switzerland.
Seriously, are you that stupid? Brain dead?
Robert Levy started the Parker case which the NRA opposed since it was before Alito and Roberts. We would have lost.
The case which Robert Levy started became Heller and the useless goa was the only group to ask for the narrow view.
The SAF and the NRA joined together for McDonald.
The NRA started Benson.
The goa is AWOL as usual.
Now leave the computer to your parents. The adults have work to do.
You must be jumping in my crap in error.
My post was a chastisement to #25.
Yeah, and the NRA did not offer to fund the lawsuits and in the Heller case it actually tried to scuttle the case. In the McDonald case, the NRA hired the lawyer who argued in favor of Heller to jam up the case.
Face it the NRA succeeds at fund raising and little else when it comes to 2nd Amendment issues, except possibly for supporting Democrat candidates that select SCOTUS judges.
Sucks to be on the losing side of an argument, doesn't it?... but you are probably used to that by now. As soon as someone starts name calling, their argument is toast and they have nothing left to give.
As usual I will let your own words speak for you...
To FR members new and old, its ole 2.5, the GOA hating NRA member
Here is a thread where you spewed your typical, and not very enlightened rant, without listening to a word someone else says Typical 2.5 whining rant about the GOA.
and here you are in another thread and using your typical whining rant with me 2.5 gets the real facts and then gets caught in a couple of, well lets say... factual distortions.
And yet again, after being confronted with facts defeating your position you continue to defend the indefensible.
So after getting your butt severely kicked to the curb many times, you continue to resort to distortions, twisting everyones words and in some cases; out right lying about your actions in an attempt to defend your pitifully weak bias.
Even so, I tried to reach out over a year after you told your usual fibs and help you see the error of your non-question, but you again went back to your old ways of unfairly attacking fellow 2A groups.
Many people have answered your stupid questions and countered your stands innumerous times you just refuse to see it. Point is, if you cant have an honest debate fighting a common enemy, then do everyone else a favor stay on the sidelines and argue with yourself, dont try to distort the focus of this fight.
Every 2A group, no matter what you may think of them should be WELCOMED to the struggle we are facing, many former NRA members, myself included, who definitely have no love for the NRA leadership have been going back into the group because the stakes are so high, dont let your petty bias cloud the big picture.
AOV sends with warmest regards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.