Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here we go...
1 posted on 07/06/2010 4:56:23 PM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cryptical

NRA haters in 3..2..1...


2 posted on 07/06/2010 4:57:04 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (You can evade reality, but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality. ~Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cryptical

This harassment will NOT end until SCOTUS, Bitch-Slaps the anti-weapons Nazis, which I don’t understand why they didn’t lay out chapter and verse last week—UNLESS the only way they could get Kennedy’s vote was not to go beyond the basic ruling.


4 posted on 07/06/2010 5:07:01 PM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cryptical

What about poor people who can afford guns? Who speaks for them? People don’t actually have a right to self defense unless the government gives them the means to exercise that right. The government should buy everyone guns.

/sarcasm


6 posted on 07/06/2010 5:07:44 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cryptical
Just four days after the Court struck down the nearly 30 year-long handgun bans in Chicago and Oak Park, Mayor Daley and the City of Chicago enacted the most restrictive anti-gun ordinance in the United States.

Chicago loves their tyrants.

7 posted on 07/06/2010 5:14:39 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower

FYI


8 posted on 07/06/2010 5:36:29 PM PDT by Petruchio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cryptical

And the goa ducks another chance to do something. Again.

AND FOR ALL YOU IGNORANT ANTIGUN NRA HATING IDIOTS:

1. The NRA didn’t become a lobbying group until 1974.

2. While whiners complain about mail, guys like me get out the checkbook.

3. The NRA fought against Parker, not Heller. That’s because Parker was filed before Roberts and Alito. We would have lost. The NRA knows how to count to the number nine.

4. The goa has never done a single thing in it’s entire history. It’s the NRA and the SAF that filed all those lawsuits.

5. The “R” in the NRA stands for rifle. Not Republican. Get rid of Reid AFTER taking control of Congress or you’ll be whining about gun control and pleading for the NRA again. As always.

6. The antigunners hate the NRA just as much as some freepers. That explains the mentality of some freepers.

7. The media doesn’t know the name of any progun group other than the NRA. That should tell you something but you’re too stupid to understand.

8. The goa is the only gun group that asked the Supreme Court to take the narrow view. So far, they haven’t filed a single lawsuit to take responsibility for their actions. It’s the NRA and the SAF that filed all those lawsuits.

9. Lazy, stupid people always have an excuse not to get involved.

Tell me a single thing the goa has ever done on their own.

McDonald vs. Chicago. Nope, SAF.

Katrina victims? Nope, NRA.

Winnetka Lawsuits? Nope, SAF and NRA

Morton Grove Lawsuit? Nope, NRA.

San Francisco? Nope, NRA

Evanston? Nope, NRA and SAF

Parker? Nope, Robert Levy and it’s a good thing the case became Heller with Roberts and Alito or we would have lost. That’s why the NRA tried to stop it.

Heller? Nope, Levy again.

United Nations attacks? Nope, NRA as a Non Government Organization.

Free legal support for their members? Nope, NRA.

Even Basil’s Second Amendment Sisters give women’s classes

JPFO? They aren’t even a lobbying group.

Who does the leftist media fear? I’ll give you a hint, the initials are NRA.

NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN WHAT THE goa HAS EVER DONE ON THEIR OWN IN THEIR ENTIRE HISTORY. NO ONE.


12 posted on 07/06/2010 6:14:11 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cryptical

I wonder what form the lawsuit will take. The best would be for a federal judge to not only overturn their laws, but to enjoin them against future actions with respect to gun laws.

If the judge wanted to, he could basically say that Chicago no longer has the ability to construct gun ordinances that exceed State law. That it is outside of their jurisdiction.

Then this would require a State lawsuit to make the State conform to MacDonald.


15 posted on 07/06/2010 6:49:59 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cryptical
At what point do the citizens of the city go to Mayor Daley's house, with tar and feathers, and run him out on a rail?

5.56mm

20 posted on 07/06/2010 7:38:18 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
23 posted on 07/07/2010 4:36:54 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nailbiter

ping


24 posted on 07/07/2010 5:17:13 AM PDT by IncPen (How can a man who won't produce his own documentation lecture the rest of us on immigration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson