Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats battle independents' weakening support of Obama and Congress ['Rats openly panicked now]
Washington Post ^ | 07/08/10 | Dan Balz

Posted on 07/09/2010 1:48:03 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Of all the problems Democrats face this fall, none may be more challenging than trying to win back the support of independent voters.

President Obama has been going backward with independents for more than a year, and the Democrats stand to suffer the effects in the November elections. The Gallup organization reported this week that just 38 percent of independents now approve of the job Obama is doing, the lowest point in his presidency and down from 56 percent a year ago.

[SNIP]

Jim Dyke, another Republican strategist, said other policy decisions by the president have turned off independents. "The health care law is a good example," he said. "They view it as a government expansion that will increase the deficit, and they are uncertain how it will impact their health care services [and] coverage. They don't believe that the stimulus package has created private sector jobs."

"This is not a liberal country," said Republican strategist John Feehery, "but it is now being governed by liberals in a liberal way, so it was almost a certainty that this reaction would take place."

[SNIP]

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; election2010; independents; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: KingLudd

“What about liberal Jews?”

I am Jewish and aside from being embarrassed and ashamed of my religion, I am afraid that they will continue to vote Marxist.

Real Jews are Conservatives. These people aren’t Jews. They are Marxists who carry the label of being Jewish.


41 posted on 07/09/2010 6:57:47 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Conservatives are producers. Liberals are parasites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Amoung non-Jewish there is a similar disease called “Liberation Theology”. (Marxism in a religious wrapper, like Rev. Wright)

I am Baptist and as a group we do not suffer from that illness, but I have observed “Liberation Theology” proponents up-close and personal beginning in the early 1980’s. They are Commies hiding in other’s clothing.

All are traitors to the nation and to any legitimate faith. They have made a “pact with the devil”.


42 posted on 07/09/2010 7:12:25 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“The Obama administration acts more like an ‘occupying force’ from outside the US........their cultural and political values are foreign to most Americans.”

Yes, its far more than just a Chicago political style thing. Within this administration there is a deep seated resentment of America’s success and their goal is clearly to cut us down to size. Have you ever once heard Obama or anyone in his adminstration profess their love and admiration for this country and what it stands for?


43 posted on 07/09/2010 7:46:13 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ripley

“Independents are nothing but Democrats in drag”

I tend to agree with your humble opinion. As an acedotal case in point, I was recently talking with someone whose highly compensated spouse is, shall we say, part of the Democratic machinery. He claimed to be an Independent. Yeah, right.


44 posted on 07/09/2010 7:54:53 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
The New New Deal By Charles R. Kesler

Adapted from a lecture delivered at Hillsdale College on February 1, 2010, during a four-day conference on “The New Deal,” co-sponsored by the Center for Constructive Alternatives and the Ludwig von Mises Lecture Series.

EXCERPT Unlike most Americans, President Obama still bristles at any suggestion that our nation is better or even luckier than other nations. To be blunt, he despises the notion that Americans consider themselves special among the peoples of the world. This strikes him as the worst sort of ignorance and ethnocentrism, which is why it was so difficult for him to decide to wear an American flag lapel pin when he started running for president, even though he knew it was political suicide to refuse wearing it.

As President Obama hinted in his Berlin speech during the campaign, he really thinks of himself as a multiculturalist, as a citizen of the world, first, and only incidentally as an American. To put it differently, he regards patriotism as morally and intellectually inferior to cosmopolitanism.

And, of course, he is never so much a citizen of the world as when defending the world’s environment against mankind’s depredations, and perhaps especially America’s depredations.

In general, the emotionalist defense of the earth—think of Al Gore—is now a vital part of the liberalism of our day. It’s a kind of substitute for earlier liberals’ belief in progress.

Although his own election—and secondarily liberalism’s achievements over the past century or so—help to redeem America in his view, Obama remains, in many ways, profoundly disconnected from his own land.

REST HERE http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp

45 posted on 07/09/2010 7:55:59 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I agree. Why be such a pansy?


46 posted on 07/09/2010 8:02:44 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Obama remains, in many ways, profoundly disconnected from his own land

A very profound and disturbing statement. Thanks for the insightful info.

Aside from his multiculturalist views, another dimension of his personality that constantly comes into play is his narcissism. As stated in the lecture, he clearly does not like what he views as America's ethnocentrism and exceptionalism, yet he is a self-centered elitist. So he is, on a personal level, that which he does not like on a national level.

47 posted on 07/09/2010 8:07:10 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

bump for later


48 posted on 07/09/2010 8:12:50 AM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

“He claimed to be an Independent. Yeah, right.”

He probably also claimed to be brilliant.

(All Socialist/Progressive/Democrats are brilliant,
dontcha know?)


49 posted on 07/09/2010 8:53:37 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
Even if the dems lose Congress and/or the Senate in Nov they are planning on a scorched earth policy of passing a laundry list of destructive bills in lame duck sessions prior to the swearing in of the new class of Congress/Senate.

I read John Fund's article. He doesn't explain how the rats in the Senate get 60 votes in a lame duck session.

50 posted on 07/09/2010 10:09:26 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

John Weaver..used to work for McCain...left his Senate office to become a Democrat...then went back to Republicans later...to be the MSMs go-to guy for Republican quotes.

He also was the source for the McCain “affair” story in 2008.


51 posted on 07/09/2010 10:33:20 AM PDT by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

38 percent of independents now approve of the job Obama is doing, the lowest point in his presidency and down from 56 percent a year ago.

It’s depressing that the approval rating is not lower. It’s hard to believe that there are any independents who support this administration


52 posted on 07/09/2010 11:52:56 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey (here's my checkbook and my car-keys, my credit carThe bigger the government = The smaller the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I read John Fund's article. He doesn't explain how the rats in the Senate get 60 votes in a lame duck session.

Perhaps they'll just "deem" their bills passed...we're not dealing with a legitimate government any longer and they're taking less and less concern in hiding that fact.

53 posted on 07/09/2010 2:21:20 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to abdicate control of it to the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

“we’re not dealing with a legitimate government any longer and they’re taking less and less concern in hiding that fact”

Time is running out for the Destructive Democrats. Frank Luntz was on Hannity tonight saying that polls are showing them far worse off than in the period leading up to the 94 election when they lost both houses in a massive defeat. Let’s hope there is change in 2010. LOL.


54 posted on 07/09/2010 8:40:41 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Time is running out for the Destructive Democrats. Frank Luntz was on Hannity tonight saying that polls are showing them far worse off than in the period leading up to the 94 election when they lost both houses in a massive defeat. Let’s hope there is change in 2010. LOL.

I have a few thoughts on that...firstly, great if true. Secondly, conservatives can't become cocky or complacent, they need to turn out as if they were down in the polls...the only poll that counts is the voter box. Which brings my to my third thought...democrats have no compunctions about violating the will of the people, either through lawsuits (see Sen. Franken to WA Gov. Gregoire (local for me)). So not only do conservatives have to win, but they have to exceed the ability of democrats to commit voter fraud...which may be large.

And even given that, the federal government is so far outside it's Constitutional limits that to cut to bring it back would appear (to the average uninvolved voter) to be massive reform.

55 posted on 07/09/2010 8:54:24 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to abdicate control of it to the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

Oh, I don’t doubt that they have plans to do so, but the GOP will be able to throw up enough road blocks to stall any action until a new congress is seated.


56 posted on 07/09/2010 8:57:21 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
Oh, I don’t doubt that they have plans to do so, but the GOP will be able to throw up enough road blocks to stall any action until a new congress is seated.

Believe me when I say, I hope you're correct, but as an independent, I don't have that level of faith in the GOP in general to do the right thing. There are individuals who will roll that way, but the party as a whole seems to have too many RINO's for my level of trust to reach that extent.

57 posted on 07/09/2010 9:01:55 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to abdicate control of it to the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bob Bennett ?


58 posted on 07/09/2010 10:02:00 PM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

“The president doesn’t appear empathetic, though I’m sure he is,
What is with Republicans? Why is this Bozo “sure he is”, and why do Republicans feel compelled to prop up the opposition?


I agree. It never ceases to amaze me, either. Little, stupid comments like this help the enemy.

He should have said “The president doesn’t appear empathetic and I see no proof that he is. I see a total disregard for....”.


59 posted on 07/09/2010 11:41:24 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TimSkalaBim

John Weaver’s not even a Republican. He’s a McCain ‘strategist’ who famously switched parties years ago.


Some of these types are planted or “moles”, I beleive.


60 posted on 07/09/2010 11:43:46 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson