Arizona Republican Gov. Jan Brewer's controversial immigration law is being copied by five states.
Arizona Republican Gov. Jan Brewer's controversial immigration law is being copied by five states.
To begin with....
Rebellion is Brewering!!
Unfortunately, NV won’t be able to try this until Reid is out of power, since he’s turned a blind eye to all the illegals working in the construction jobs here. My friend’s husband, a union plumber, has been unemployed for seven months, while the contruction on HR projects just keeps going.
The ads he has been playing using his opponent concerning jobs, Medicare and others of his pet ram bills have cut off her statements to the point that they make no sense at all. HR needs to sit down and shut up.
We NEED immigration laws, and if the feds won’t do it, then the states MUST, and we need to keep the Militia busy.
Oooohhh!! Here’s a thought: Use captured illegals to help build the wall, then deport them when the wall is done... ;o]
The cheeky Kenyan bastard will not be able to set foot in those states. He will be arrested.
“Arizona Republican Gov. Jan Brewer’s controversial immigration law is being copied by five states.”
Good!
One thing...Jan Brewer saw the writing on the wall and got the nerve to sign the bill, but it wasn’t ‘her’ bill. We have to thank Russell Pearce and the AZ legislature for that.
Jan, I love ya, but do something about that eye.......!!
Militant
I’m surprised this is happening in MI and MN.
Are we now going to hear the incessant drumbeat call of racism? Will the rest of the states begin to mount an economic boycott of MI, SC, MN, PA, RI? Are there any big time sports events in the future for any of these states, are people going to demand they be moved to another site? Is the DOJ going to advance lawsuits on these spots now too??
now all those states need to stop wasting money deporting the illegals and instead just bus them to the nearest sanctuary city in a nearby state, give the liberals there what they want
excerpted from The Philadelphia Inquirer, June 27, 2010...
Philadelphia is expected to end the arrangement that permits federal immigration agents to scrutinize the city's computerized list of arrests, including country of origin and other data, deputy mayor for public safety Everett Gillison said Sunday.
Immigrant advocates say the year-old agreement between the city and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement service, known as ICE, has resulted in deportation proceedings against immigrants arrested on even minor charges. Under the agreement, ICE agents can routinely access the city's Preliminary Arraignment Reporting System, known as PARS. That agreement is up for renewal on Thursday.
"It is the mayor's view that the PARS agreement should not be extended," said Gillison, speaking at a South Philadelphia church meeting attended by more than 300 immigrants and their supporters.
Mayor Nutter has expressed concern about the human rights of all immigrants, regardless of their legal status.
In a directive he issued a year ago, he barred municipal employees on official business from inquiring about the immigration status of any person, including, but not limited to, victims, witnesses, arrestees and detainees.
The only sane portion of article...
Mark Medvesky, a spokesman for ICE in Philadelphia, said he could not comment in detail about the city's intentions regarding PARS until it takes formal action.
But he did say, "Our priority is convicted criminal aliens, getting dangerous people off the street. That's one of the reasons we wanted access to PARS."
Pa? Really? Cool. Brewer for Prez! The only Republican with balls!
Michigan, South Carolina, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.
If you would like to be added or dropped from the Michigan ping list, please freepmail me.
I had no idea the legislation was being considered in the mitten, but it's about damn time. I'm sick of the Canucks swimming over and stealing our jobs.
It just hit me. Am I crazy for thinking that the main reason the Federal Government is filing this lawsuit against Arizona to keep certain facts and records out of public view until after the elections?
I’m glad about Michigan, but puzzled as to why we are actually doing something right...for a change.
Are we concerned about Jenny? or what?
(kidding)
Thread bump.