She is a criminal liar, and Larry Klayman is quite right to bring this suit, although he might have done so earlier.
Kagan’s lie, which she has tried to cover up during the current confirmation process, has been known for some time, but regretably no one but Klayman seems to have realized the full legal implications of her lie.
She wants to be a Supreme Court justice, but she deliberately lied to the Supreme Court in a manner that affected one of their major decisions. (Regretably, SCOTUS may have been thankful that she gave them the opportunity to make that pro-abortion decision with her convenient lie, by a margin of 5 to 4.)
Klayman did quite a bit of good during the clinton years, discovering dirt and publicizing it and embarrassing the Criminal in Chief. But he does, indeed, have a poor record at winning any of his lawsuits. Not necessarily because he’s wrong, but because today’s judges don’t much like this kind of thing—people digging up dirt on prominent politicians and judges.
You are right. I sort of like Klayman, he files complaints that are true, and at least stands to be counted! Who does win a lot of these type of suits? like you say, these judges don’t want to be reminded to look in their own back yard!
Matter of fact is, Kagan is a baby murdering,anti constitution communist scumbag carpet muncher. and besides that, shes ugly....
My question is, why wasn’t this vetted at her hearing?
(Chirp...chirp...chirp....)
“She is a criminal liar”
WHOA, here’s the smoking gun. Right after the following words, you can see the proof in Kagan’s OWN handwriting (just click the link below):
“Kagan then apparently edited the word “not” out of the statement to make the statement more favorable for supporters of partial-birth abortion.”