Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

Refute the content of the article. This is more evidence of the illegal nature of this 0bamunist regime, and Kagan is in it up to her armpits.


3 posted on 08/05/2010 3:12:19 AM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

I clicked on the search, clicked on the third one (randomly) and it came up “Louis Lutz” vs Obama. I can’t find anything else on “Louis Lutz”. Is he a birther?


4 posted on 08/05/2010 3:22:12 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup
...This is more evidence of the illegal nature of this 0bamunist regime, and Kagan is in it up to her armpits.

WAKE UP AMERICA


SUPREME COURT-2

10 posted on 08/05/2010 3:40:06 AM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup
Refute the content of the article.

OK. Kovacs writes "A simple search of the high court's own website reveals Kagan's name coming up at least nine times on dockets involving Obama eligibility issues." He links to this page as support for that claim.

Out of those "nine times" Kovacs cites, it appears that precisely ZERO of them actually involve Obama eligibility issues, as Kovacs claims.

Louis Lutz is a fruitcake who sued Bush for $100 billion, and then appealed his way up to the Supreme Court.

Jerome Julius Brown and Gary William Holt are prisoners, and their cases appear to be civil rights claims.

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc., Petitioner v. Federal Election Commission was an FEC case about anti-Obama ads about abortion.

And Abdul Hamid Abdul Salam Al-Ghizzawi and Jamal Kiyemba were Guantanamo detainees who filed suit over their detention.

Nothing about Obama's eligibility in a single one of them. Notice how Kovacs doesn't actually quote anything from any of the cases that shows they're eligibility-related; he just says they are. This is a good illustration of how much trust you should put in WND's reporting.

19 posted on 08/05/2010 10:03:11 AM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson