Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liberty1970

It’s not a failure. By your methods, all you do is put half (or more) of the Senate seats out of permanent reach of electing Republicans. Direct elections ensure that EVERY state has a shot at doing so, including even Massachusetts (Brown’s election would never have occurred with a 90% Democrat legislature).


15 posted on 08/25/2010 8:15:24 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj
By your methods, all you do is put half (or more) of the Senate seats out of permanent reach of electing Republicans. Direct elections ensure that EVERY state has a shot at doing so, including even Massachusetts (Brown’s election would never have occurred with a 90% Democrat legislature).

Not necessarily so. In my own state, we have Democrats with a history of shamelessly purchasing votes from demographic groups, which has been enough to virtually guarantee re-election. Half of the State's population is in three cities, the rest throughout the State.

The result has been a Republican State Government with Democrats in DC.

Repealing the 17th would change that.

32 posted on 08/25/2010 11:45:00 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson