Skip to comments.
John Bolton for President?
Posted on 09/01/2010 9:40:53 AM PDT by GoCards
On Americas Newsroom, Bolton said "It is not of the table"
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Hmmm. Thoughts?
1
posted on
09/01/2010 9:40:56 AM PDT
by
GoCards
To: GoCards
I heard him say he would wait until after the mid-terms, so I guess it’s a possibility. He would most definitely get my vote.
To: GoCards
I heard it too. I just bought a used copy of his book on Amazon.
I have always liked him. He articulates American Exceptionalism very well and he is always for America first.
3
posted on
09/01/2010 9:44:01 AM PDT
by
dockkiller
(COME AND TAKE IT.)
To: GoCards
I’ve often wished he would run.
4
posted on
09/01/2010 9:45:05 AM PDT
by
keats5
(Not all of us are hypnotized.)
To: GoCards
How about Secretary of State?
5
posted on
09/01/2010 9:46:08 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: GoCards
There are certainly far worse folks who could run.
6
posted on
09/01/2010 9:46:56 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
To: GoCards
To: GoCards
8
posted on
09/01/2010 9:48:00 AM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Pablo is very wily)
To: roaddog727
that’s for sure.
(maybe it could be by or for the table.)
9
posted on
09/01/2010 9:48:06 AM PDT
by
WOBBLY BOB
(drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
To: roaddog727
Thats true. I like him alot, I just remember the awful time he had getting through the congress to head the UN. What did the other side dislike about Bolton? His love for country, lol!!
10
posted on
09/01/2010 9:48:22 AM PDT
by
GoCards
("We eat therefore we hunt...")
To: GoCards
11
posted on
09/01/2010 9:48:43 AM PDT
by
Paperdoll
(On the cutting edge)
To: GoCards
12
posted on
09/01/2010 9:48:47 AM PDT
by
heiss
To: GoCards
Bolton said "It is not of the table"Well is it BY the table then?
To: GoCards
Countries and groups who mean harm to our beloved country would be shaking in their boots if he were elected.
He would also need to become cleanshaven to seek higher office because Americans really are that fickle about things.
14
posted on
09/01/2010 9:49:11 AM PDT
by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: a fool in paradise
That sounds more like it.
15
posted on
09/01/2010 9:49:18 AM PDT
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: GoCards
The nomination process could use an ass-kicker like him.
To: GoCards
Certainly professional qualified.
I would think a senior foreign policy position would probably be a more realistic fit - National Security Advisor to Secretary of State.
Considering he couldn’t get his UN Ambassador position confirmed in the Senate - might be a tough proposition unless we get a complete rout this fall.
To: GoCards
Glad to hear he’s open to running. I’d vote for him.
18
posted on
09/01/2010 9:53:29 AM PDT
by
Mobties
To: GoCards
The MSM would be “all over him” in a negative way, assiduously. Also, it would be very difficult for him to get the majority of moderate voters to vote for him, IMHO. Still, I wouldn’t mind him running for POTUS, and I would, definitely, vote for him, if he became the final choice for GOP POTUS.
19
posted on
09/01/2010 9:53:57 AM PDT
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
To: GoCards
THat’s the answer. His love of country and his unwillingness to cave to the UN.
20
posted on
09/01/2010 9:54:18 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson