Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives denounce GOP 'Pledge' as sellout, inside job
The Daily Caller ^ | 9/25/10 | Jon Ward

Posted on 09/26/2010 9:19:11 AM PDT by GOPavenger33

House Republicans have been relatively successful this week at presenting a united front around their “Pledge to America,” but only through a strategic outreach campaign to lawmakers, media and outside groups, that has managed to keep deep dissatisfaction over several key issues largely under wraps.

Still, interviews with Republican aides reveal that many in the GOP caucus are unhappy that there was no earmark ban and no promise to pass a balanced budget amendment in the proposal, which was unveiled Thursday by House Minority Leader John Boehner. The inclusion of a health insurance provision considered to be mandate angered many conservative lawmakers.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 0botposter; abortion; acornpaidforthispost; aliens; amnesty; arizona; assclownpost; bho44; boehner; bp; cantor; catholic; china; democrats; divideandconquer; dncbot; earmark; economy; elections; energy; ericcantor; examiner; fail; fauxconservtive; golf; gulf; homosexualagenda; kevinmccarthy; moralabsolutes; moveonorginaction; nationalreview; obama; obamaposter; organizingfor0post; paulryan; pledge; pledgetoamerica; republicannazi; republicans; samesexmarriage; teaparty; teapartymoron; toohard; unionpaidforpost; zotthisclownposter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-245 next last
House Republicans have been relatively successful this week at presenting a united front around their “Pledge to America,” but only through a strategic outreach campaign to lawmakers, media and outside groups, that has managed to keep deep dissatisfaction over several key issues largely under wraps.

Still, interviews with Republican aides reveal that many in the GOP caucus are unhappy that there was no earmark ban and no promise to pass a balanced budget amendment in the proposal, which was unveiled Thursday by House Minority Leader John Boehner. The inclusion of a health insurance provision considered to be mandate angered many conservative lawmakers.

“We’re going to repeal Obamacare and then bring a large chunk of it back. It’s kind of crazy,” said a senior Republican official.

And social conservative leaders said that a commitment to upholding the Defense of Marriage Act was dropped at the last moment.

“They kept talking about realism. They wanted it to be realistic, something we could do, not pipe dreams,” said one House aide who said that while leadership sought extensive input, they threw many of the ideas they received “in the trash heap.”

In addition, a 21-page proposal requiring all legislation to be posted online for 72 hours prior to a vote was not distributed to Republican lawmakers until the night before the rollout. Many Republican offices didn’t even see it until it leaked to the media Wednesday afternoon, leading one aide to write in an e-mail to fellow legislative directors: “We shouldn’t have to get our own agenda from CBS News.”

But skittish rank-and-file members were reassured at a Wednesday night caucus meeting by leadership aides who distributed a National Review editorial praising the “Pledge.” The National Review editorial had been prearranged, however, by Neil Bradley, a top leadership aide* who is close to April Ponnuru, the executive director of the National Review Institute, and Kate O’Beirne, NRI’s president.

O’Beirne denied the allegation, calling it “absolutely, categorically false.”

House GOP leadership aides and lawmakers justified the lack of an earmark ban by telling others who pressed for one that they would implement it after the midterm elections on Nov. 2.

“They said, ‘We don’t want to pick a fight with our appropriators now. That’s a fight we can pick after the election,’” said one House Republican aide.

But the aide said that many in the Republican caucus don’t believe Boehner, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, or any other members of the leadership actually want a ban.

“Once we’re in power they’ll say, ‘Let’s find a reasonable way to earmark,’ which of course the Tea Party will see as total capitulation. Most people around here don’t realize the extent to which Joe America sees earmarks as the poster child for out of control Washington spending,” the aide said.

Another aide who was present in meetings to draft the document agreed: “They already have an earmark moratorium, and not to continue that is a pretty huge flag that they want to get back into the earmark business.”

“Leadership doesn’t do anything unless they’re boxed in. So they’ll do small stuff. They’ll repeal stimulus. They’ll do these YouCut votes. But in terms of dealing with entitlement reform, challenging the president to deal with the long term fiscal imbalances, they aren’t willing to at least articulate it in their document. I do not see them willing to legislate and govern in that area,” the aide said.

1 posted on 09/26/2010 9:19:13 AM PDT by GOPavenger33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33
Balanced Budget and no Earmarks was critically important. Dems will play off that.
2 posted on 09/26/2010 9:21:41 AM PDT by JSteff ((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33
Do we really want them to come out before the election and promise to phase out the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs? Wouldn't it be better to first get elected and then explain to the public why it is necessary to dismantle the welfare state?

If they don't get elected, they can't do anything.

3 posted on 09/26/2010 9:23:09 AM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSteff

It will take a few years to oust the RINOS.


4 posted on 09/26/2010 9:25:13 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33

Which has made me truly wonder, and for some time now, whether there’s really a place for true Conservatives in the GOP; I don’t think there is.


5 posted on 09/26/2010 9:28:28 AM PDT by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33

Not breaking news.


6 posted on 09/26/2010 9:28:58 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSteff

Balanced budget is a trap that would play into the hands of RINOs and Dhimmicrats. You can “balance” the budget by raising taxes, or in many other anti-taxpayer and anti-Amercan ways. Only economic illiteracy - best case scenario - would make that a hill to die on.

And quite frankly, the Daily Caller hates the guts of the Tea Party and has been playing a dirty game throughot the recent primaries


7 posted on 09/26/2010 9:29:18 AM PDT by fabrizio (Restore the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick

Oh! stop it your just being reasonable.


8 posted on 09/26/2010 9:30:01 AM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33

The pledge wasn’t enough, but it’s a start.


9 posted on 09/26/2010 9:32:59 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33

The pledge that was unveiled is a good start, a bold first step.

The important thing of all is the follow through.

Conservatives will be watching and taking note.


10 posted on 09/26/2010 9:33:04 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Seems to me that a lot of people are still living under the impression that we should be able to elect republicans and all should be well.

The simple fact is that we’re going to have to stand over them with a whip for the rest of our lives.

We also need to avoid becoming like the democrats in our desire to punish.


11 posted on 09/26/2010 9:33:06 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Walts Ice Pick

Granted to your point but Earmarks are not in that category. Another big issue is “riders” attached to a bill like Harry’s Dream Act attachement to the Defense Approporiations Bill. That would stop of this stupid gotcha legislation.


12 posted on 09/26/2010 9:33:35 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33

Ryan stated that the republicans have already signed a no earmarks pledge.


13 posted on 09/26/2010 9:36:48 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33

Welcome to Free Republic.


14 posted on 09/26/2010 9:37:35 AM PDT by FourPeas (Pester not the geek, for the electrons are his friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33
GOPavenger33 Since Sep 26, 2010

So which Leftist clown posse do your work for?

Nice try at spreading disinformation and dissension in Conservatives ranks Dembot but we know all about your training seminars about infiltrating Conservative websites over there at the Moveon.org

15 posted on 09/26/2010 9:37:51 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fabrizio
GOPavenger33 Since Sep 26, 2010

It is a Demobot InfiTraitor not a serious source of news.

16 posted on 09/26/2010 9:39:35 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: glide625
I don’t think there is.

A look at your posting history shows you just don't think.

Like the rest of the Hate-the-GOP-Always 3rd party-bots here on Freeper, you would hate what ever the GOP did.

17 posted on 09/26/2010 9:41:28 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33; 50mm; paulycy; humblegunner
Sniff. Welcome noob. Your posted article appears to have the intent of festering a divide between the GOP and conservatives. The biggest divide is between America loving constitutionalists and the marxists presently in Washington.

Are you a concern troll?

18 posted on 09/26/2010 9:41:34 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (I'm with Jim DeMint ... on the fringe baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33
“Leadership doesn’t do anything unless they’re boxed in. So they’ll do small stuff.

Repealing Obamacare seems like more than small stuff to me.

19 posted on 09/26/2010 9:43:40 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPavenger33
The Tea Party(caucus) is getting stronger by the minute..
Each new election will have the candidates vetted by them..
Hope "somebody" is watching out for tea PArty MOLeS...
20 posted on 09/26/2010 9:43:50 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson