Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Threats to 2010 Air Supremacy
AirForceAssocHQ's Channel ^ | Sept. 22, 2010 | USAF Staff

Posted on 10/07/2010 5:12:16 AM PDT by Broker

USAF Video

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airpower; fighters; missles; space
Technology marches ahead.. With or without U.S.
1 posted on 10/07/2010 5:12:22 AM PDT by Broker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Broker

Bump!


2 posted on 10/07/2010 5:34:15 AM PDT by Wilum (Never loaded a nuke I didn't like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

NAVAIR Ping...


3 posted on 10/07/2010 5:43:25 AM PDT by Broker (Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Broker

mark


4 posted on 10/07/2010 5:46:22 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Broker

Nice bit of AF propaganda....but even if the Russkies and China “catch up” in 2018 or whenever, do we assume that our aeronautical wizards are doing nothing in the interim?


5 posted on 10/07/2010 5:46:58 AM PDT by JimVT (Oh, the days of the Kerry dancing, Oh, the ring of the piper's tune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Broker

bttt


6 posted on 10/07/2010 5:54:10 AM PDT by jslade (People who are easily offended, OFFEND ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimVT

We’ve cut production of both the F-22 and F-35. Even if the Skunk Works has something in development it will take a long time to get them into production. With the budget cuts I doubt much is being funneled to R&D. When 0bama declares victory in Afghanistan budgets will be cut back even further.


7 posted on 10/07/2010 5:58:28 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Broker

Threat #1 should be Obama.


8 posted on 10/07/2010 6:10:13 AM PDT by Never on my watch (Why does the Left think Muslims are going to behave as Christians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimVT

The answer, unfortunately, is yes. At this time there are no new development programs for manned fighters or bombers starting: Unless they are black programs and beyond comment.

Development has shifted to UASs which have multiple Achilles heals but lack a critical one; there are no people in the craft.

In order to fight remotely with UASs, one needs secured, protected satellite systems. At this time that is a fallacy as shown to us by the Chinese.

Also, UASs, when flow remotely, cannot maneuver outside their pre-programmed flight path due to communications lag; it’s been tried and there’s about a 3 second one-way lag so the “pilot” doesn’t even see the results of his input until 6 seconds after the initial input... This falls under the category of “Bad”.

Also, UASs, even flown locally, cannot compete with a manned aircraft; big or small, just dumb unmaneuverable targets.

This stampede to get rid of persons in the loop is just a horrible idea; loose the ability to fly, loose the air superiority war, loose the ground war: Ask the Germans and Iraq’s about that. Having a mixed group is better, but it’s not going that way at this time.


9 posted on 10/07/2010 6:45:58 AM PDT by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Broker

It appears that Aerospace industry is looking for more funding? No wonder China is ahead, they’re getting all our money to support their R&D. Russia has tons of bucks coming in with their Oil holdings and they are increasing their income with weapon sales. We are no longer the great arms producing country that we were. The others have caught on that there are big bucks to be made in arms sales.


10 posted on 10/07/2010 10:00:26 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (The candidate they smear the most is the one they fear the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
Further the competition has been generously FEED US Technology courtesy of our own Benevolent US FEDERAL Govt. Whatever we failed to GIVE AWAY, was easily stolen. Still further, the US Armed Forces have been openly demonstrating our capabilities for the past two decades, teaching and advancing GLOBAL R&D against us.
11 posted on 10/07/2010 10:19:59 AM PDT by Broker (Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Broker

We can cover the F-22 gap with the F-15SE, the “Silent Eagle” and I would build more F-15 Strike Eagle’s too. I think we also need a lower cost fighter and always thought the F-20 would have fit the bill, basically an upgraded F-5. Lastly, we should have kept the F-14, despite the 1970 era electronics, it still can compete today.


12 posted on 10/08/2010 5:00:57 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man
One more thing, the CF-105 Avro Arrow was one plane that should have been built, I wonder how it would fare today? It was quite way ahead of it's time.

Photobucket

In the background is the CF-100 Canuck, I've seen films from that time and it's radar system was way ahead of it's time.
13 posted on 10/08/2010 5:12:11 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson