To: BuckeyeTexan
>Nope. The law is clear. His orders were lawful regardless of Obama’s status.
He has sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution; to leave the question of Obama’s eligibility unresolved would be dishonorable and Conduct Unbecoming an Officer.
...Or do you want to argue that a military officer has no interest or obligation to see the Constitution followed?
33 posted on
10/13/2010 3:49:04 PM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: OneWingedShark
He has sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution; to leave the question of Obama’s eligibility unresolved would be dishonorable and Conduct Unbecoming an Officer. What is honorable about refusing to obey the orders of your brigade commander and two other superior officer?
34 posted on
10/13/2010 3:52:08 PM PDT by
Non-Sequitur
(Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
To: OneWingedShark
No. I wouldn’t argue that. But a military court martial can’t resolve that question. It’s irrelevant as far as they’re concerned.
36 posted on
10/13/2010 3:56:58 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
To: OneWingedShark
to leave the question of Obama’s eligibility unresolved would be dishonorable and Conduct Unbecoming an Officer.So you believe that all of the tens of thousands of officers serving in the military who HAVEN'T followed Lakin's lead are without honor and guilty of Conduct Unbecoming?
110 posted on
10/13/2010 5:24:05 PM PDT by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson