Posted on 10/14/2010 6:45:50 PM PDT by Seattle Conservative
Info here (Spokane or Eastern WA stations and live streaming):
televised on KXLY4, KSPS, simulcast on KXLY920 and streamed live on kxly.com. http://www.kxly.com/index.html
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...
Dino’s approach has grown on me. I like that cool, analytical approach. BTW, does Patty have a neck problem? It seems to be permanently tilted to her right.
She wants a “clear path to citizenship” alias Amnesty.
He clearly wants “high gates”, wants to know who is coming here...secure the borders...sysstem for “temporary” workers which includes high tech.
“I’m sooooooooooo concerned about the SCOTUS allowing those EEEEEEEEEVILLLLLL corporations to buy ads.”
Ironic, isn’t it?
There have been several comments on the site stating the same thing - close-ins on Patsy only
He just called her a liar, referring to her attack ads.
She whines about a girl who "lives in the shadows" because her parents brought her here illegally when she was three. Apparently it's lost on her that a girl who has access to her state's senior senator and feels free to acknowledge her illegal status to her is not living in any shadow.
Rossi has gotten warmed up and is putting some oomph and personality into it. He’s doing a good job.
He just gave her knockout punch. Hammered her on voting on the stimulus, bailouts and the fact that the newspapers said her ads are misleading and downright lies!
A common theme that is showing up in the 3 senatorial debates I’ve watched yesterday and today is a subtle dig the dims are using, roughly translated: “My opponent again did not answer the question”.
I don’t have my copy of “Rules for Radicals” on hand but I’m sure I could find a substantial directive to use that tactic.
She really does live in her own world. Rossi twice stated that newspapers have called her ads malicious, etc. and she rebuts with “I’m glad those newspapers endorsed me.” WHAT?
I lived in Spokane back in the late 1970s, BTW. A beautiful city then. Anyone living there now? Curious how it looks these days.
Barack does the same thing. It’s the Marxist pose :)
“I’m sooooooooooo concerned about the SCOTUS allowing those EEEEEEEEEVILLLLLL corporations to buy ads.”
But not how UNCONCERNED she is about Unions and foreign-financed Democrat/Socialist/Communist Issue Groups buying ads.
I cannot IMAGINE why that is, Can you??
It depends on the definition.
I blinked twice at that! It didn’t make any sense.
I thought I was hearing things when she said that...glad to see I’m not going crazy!
THAT should be on a campaign ad.
There goes that slow zoom on patty again!
Lol! Took me a minute. I have tried to block the Clinton years from memory. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.