Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Email Response From NPR Exec
NPR email | 10/25/2010 | Dana Davis Rehm

Posted on 10/25/2010 12:15:52 PM PDT by South40

Dear xxxxxx,

Late Wednesday evening we gave Juan Williams notice that we’ve terminated his contract as a Senior News Analyst for NPR News. We didn’t make this decision lightly or without regret. Juan has been a valuable contributor to NPR and public radio for many years.

However, his remarks on The O’Reilly Factor this past Monday violated our ethics guidelines. Unfortunately, this has occurred several times in other media. Our decision to end our contractual relationship with Juan has come after repeated conversations and warnings about some of his public comments. This was a difficult, but principled decision.

We’ve been contacted by listeners who have passionately agreed with our decision, as well as those who have disagreed with it, with equal conviction. We hear you both and respect your perspectives. At the same time, we believe that the public is better served by NPR holding firm to the values and standards that have guided us for many years.

As some listeners have also asked for more details about our funding, you can find a detailed overview of our funding on our website in our “About” section: http://www.npr.org/about/aboutnpr/ Of note, and as is explained in that site, NPR, Inc. has received no direct operating support from the federal government since 1983.

I recognize that this decision has sparked a strong debate in the blogosphere and elsewhere, and that you have a firm position on the matter. While we stand by our policy, we also regret that we were compelled to take the actions that we did.

Sincerely

Dana Davis Rehm

Senior Vice President, Marketing, Communications, and External Relations


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/25/2010 12:15:54 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: South40
This was a difficult, but principled decision.

CAIR.

2 posted on 10/25/2010 12:18:56 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

That’s one giant release of flatus translated to electronic communications...

By the same standards, Nina Tottenburg should have been fired many times over.

No more tax dollars to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.


3 posted on 10/25/2010 12:20:05 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
However, his remarks on The O’Reilly Factor this past Monday violated our ethics guidelines. Unfortunately, this has occurred several times in other media.

With other media? What do YOUR ethics guidelines have to do with OTHER media who he works with? Juan needs to sue these bastards.

4 posted on 10/25/2010 12:20:14 PM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
Clue: "No DIRECT operating support from Fed Gov"

I believe GM is one of their big supporters

5 posted on 10/25/2010 12:21:06 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

I got one too, after sending them a nasty e-mail about what a loyal listener and dedicated liberal I was who’d never listen to NPR again!


6 posted on 10/25/2010 12:21:38 PM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Media Matters has been pushing for his removal also.

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200902130007

7 posted on 10/25/2010 12:21:49 PM PDT by South40 (Spread my work ethic not my wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Nina Tottenburg should have been fired many times over.

And her name will be the subject of my response.

8 posted on 10/25/2010 12:23:40 PM PDT by South40 (Spread my work ethic not my wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spok

The tone of arrogance is astounding. While saying they have received letters on both sides of the issue may be true I/we know the overwhelming majority have been critical of their bone-headed decision.


9 posted on 10/25/2010 12:27:46 PM PDT by South40 (Spread my work ethic not my wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Spok

I also got the same reply..they must have done a mass mailing of that message!!

I sent three email over the past week and I received three emails all the same!

I believe for NPR to heal they will have to select a new PRESIDENT/CEO, as for my self I will never again support them...


10 posted on 10/25/2010 12:28:04 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: South40
Looks like an harassing email to me.
11 posted on 10/25/2010 12:29:51 PM PDT by muawiyah ("GIT OUT THE WAY" The Republicans are coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
Of note, and as is explained in that site, NPR, Inc. has received no direct operating support from the federal government since 1983.

Of note, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting the shell company that receives the money has a revenue stream of $2.85 BILLION. 40% of that or $1.1 BILLION is TAX revenue.

Much of that went to PBS-TV side of the house but about $25% went to the public radio system. The DIRECT funding is insignificant but the INDIRECT amount isn't. Stop laundering your funds, you're making ENRON look good. And yes I have backup

http://www.cpb.org/aboutcpb/financials/appropriation/justification_11-13.pdf

12 posted on 10/25/2010 12:30:01 PM PDT by Drango (NO-vember is payback for April 15th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
We’ve been contacted by listeners who have passionately agreed with our decision, as well as those who have disagreed with it

Notice that the people who agreed PASSIONATELY AGREED while those who disagreed were not so PASSIONATE.

No slant to this article is there?????????????????????????

13 posted on 10/25/2010 12:32:10 PM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything, it begins to rot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

Apparently their “principles” also involve publicly calling into question the sanity of someone they wrongfully terminated. The NPR CEO is as unprofessional as it gets & she should be terminated, but that won’t happen because their “principles” are trash.


14 posted on 10/25/2010 12:32:16 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

And Juan was the only African American working there. Looks like racial discrimination doesn’t it.


15 posted on 10/25/2010 12:39:55 PM PDT by hgro (Jerry Riversdun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH; South40; Windflier; Nachum; justiceseeker93; freekitty; MamaDearest; seekthetruth; bitt; ...

We The People have to ensure that none of us donate to NPR since they claim most of their donations come from the public. Let’s see how many rabid RATs want to pay NPR’s way. They can go suck more out of Soros and CAIR.


16 posted on 10/25/2010 12:43:28 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (YEAH, I ALREADY VOTED TO CLEAN THE SEWER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: South40

As in Animal House, doing Belushi -> cough, cough - bull$h!t !!!!!!


17 posted on 10/25/2010 12:52:17 PM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Let them live off Soros without our money.


18 posted on 10/25/2010 12:55:47 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

They have no business getting any taxpayers money.

They claim they are “non-commercial” yet they have commercials on there all the time, cleverly disguised as “Thank-You” Announcements.

Their Obvious bias and agenda-driven politics always show through.

let those who watch it, support it. NO MORE TAXPAYER FUNDING!


19 posted on 10/25/2010 1:00:34 PM PDT by left that other site (Your MiQ-MaQ Paddy Wacky Bass-Playing Biker Buddy(El Kabong))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Beyond the Federal $$$, don't forget most PBS/NPR stations are run by publicly (i.e. state $$$) universities. Statist propaganda from, well, a bunch of statist.
20 posted on 10/25/2010 1:01:36 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: South40

You of course realize that these execs are smarter and know more than you and therefore the condescending tone/arrogance can be excused /s


21 posted on 10/25/2010 1:07:14 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: South40
WOW - NPR's not only creepy, they're also liars.

Has anyone looked at some of the comments NPR liberals have made in the past? Comments like wishing death on conservatives and their grandkids, thinking the world would be better if 4 million Christians quit existing... etc. No one got fired for those comments. And if Juan has said he felt a little scared walking around a Tea Party, they would have given him an award.

NPR has shown their true colors - it's time to de-fund the liars.

22 posted on 10/25/2010 1:13:11 PM PDT by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40
NPR, Inc. has received no direct operating support from the federal government since 1983.

This statement is disingenuous, at best.

I took a quick review of the financial statements of Corporation For Public Broadcasting (CPB), NPR and one local station, WOSU.

My quick review (info. subject to change) is that the CPB received most all of its $484 million in revenue from the Feds in 2009.

CPB paid all of the $484 million to local stations or for programming seen on local stations such as WOSU.

WOSU received approximately $1.9 million in 2009 from CBC (mostly) and other Federal grants (much smaller amount). State and local governments contributed $1.1 million and I assume this is mostly from Ohio State University. NPR received $65 million from member stations, such as WOSU, in 2009. Also, NPR received about $15 million from CPB and may have received more from the local stations, but I cannot immediately tell from the financial statements.

So, what does this mean:

Even though money is fungible and cannot be traced directly, it is clear that money from the Feds flows through CPB, money flows to local stations and NPR from CPB, and money flows from local stations to NPR.

It is an incestuous relationship and any claim by NPR that they do not receive Federal money is trumped by the fact that they receive the benefit of money from the Feds that flows through CPB and the local stations. Further, NPR would not exist but for the money pumped into these organizations by the government.

23 posted on 10/25/2010 1:27:37 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

FREE SPECTRUM!

The Federal government under the Roosevelt Administration allocated 88.1 megahertz to 91.9 megahertz to non-profit broadcasting. This spectrum was deliberately removed from visibly commercial use. Radio stations broadcasting in this spectrum may not sell advertising time.

These stations were not worth much money until the 1960s, when Japanese transistor radios got cheap enough to create a large audience for FM radio. FM signals are cleaner than AM radio. They are high fidelity. They soon became stereo.

Any station operating in this spectrum receives a subsidy. The value of this subsidy is whatever money the station would bring at an open auction. If these frequencies were sold off, once and for all, to investors, not one of these stations would be able to buy back its frequency. Commercial stations that most people want to listen to would buy them.

These stations are used mainly by college radio stations and Christian stations. At least one college station in every region broadcasts NPR in the afternoon.

The only way that NPR stays on the air is through this ancient subsidy. Without it, NPR would go off the air. For good.


24 posted on 10/25/2010 1:31:18 PM PDT by Drango (NO-vember is payback for April 15th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: haircutter
as for my self I will never again support them...

Yes, you will, and you don't get a choice about it. They get taxpayer dollars.

25 posted on 10/25/2010 1:35:37 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Yes, their ideas are right out of the sewer of radicals.

They are unAmercian Freudian-Marxists by ALL dictionary standards and it is imperative that we end their monopoly on the PC—allowed speech which they have impose on our airwaves and at all public-funded universities and schools and many foundations, including most media.

The people have to demand all these organizations quit the brainwashing and the lying and suppression of truth and the ban on idea of God-given rights in the public square.


26 posted on 10/25/2010 1:36:07 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: South40

Aggressively defensive, imo.

Beyond defunding CPB/NPR: I believe they are specially chartered by Congress as the ‘national’ communications network. It’s the same sort of thing that major league baseball enjoys. That charter should be revoked. Perhaps they could rename the entities “Soros Communications.”


27 posted on 10/25/2010 1:43:21 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

your right!!!
but they will never see a donation from my check book


28 posted on 10/25/2010 2:11:53 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
I don't care how PC NPR is - that is IF they're NOT using my tax dollars to put out their message.

I don't think liberals would like it if Rush was put in charge of NPR and folks were fired for saying something liberal.

29 posted on 10/25/2010 2:34:59 PM PDT by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Of note, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting the shell company that receives the money has a revenue stream of $2.85 BILLION. 40% of that or $1.1 BILLION is TAX revenue.

Thanks for posting the truth...

30 posted on 10/25/2010 2:36:27 PM PDT by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

The airways should not be allowed to “brainwash” and lie. Ideas have to based in truth—yes, opinions are always allowed—but the left is forcing people who have opinions like Dr. Laura to be destroyed and silenced. They are trying to silence Beck and have silenced Wilders and Savage in some areas. The Constitution DEFENDS the freedom of speech no matter how obnoxious.

This control should never be allowed in a free society. The left is silencing too many people on college campuses and in the media, if they don’t like the message, no matter if it is the truth. On PC campuses they have no tolerance of Christian ideas and accept and allow obscenities and debased plays. Obscenity was never given a platform by the Founders. We saw government controlled media in action with Juan Williams. Free Press is the No.1 necessity for a free America.

Government controlled media should NEVER be allowed. It is only agitprop for the elites in government and can be used against the people. The power of the media to form ideas is very dangerous to a Republic when the elites in charge are corrupt which power tends to always do.


31 posted on 10/25/2010 3:07:19 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: South40

Juan should sue, then during Dicovery have NPR release ALL the letters asking for ‘permission’, if any.


32 posted on 10/25/2010 3:44:00 PM PDT by Wizdum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye; GOPJ; Drango; Sacajaweau; left that other site
Of note, and as is explained in that site, NPR, Inc. has received no direct operating support from the federal government since 1983.

This was taken from the very link she provided regarding federal funding which, as you can see above, she *claims* they do not recieive.


33 posted on 10/25/2010 4:06:57 PM PDT by South40 (Spread my work ethic not my wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: South40

NPR is NOT the local member stations and so Schiller’s fudge isn’t technically false. Keep in mind NPR doesn’t broadcast. They are a producer and distributor of programs. They are separate entities and so NPR is correct in a very narrow and disingenuous sense. It’s a shell game.

The reality is they are one and the same to the average listener.


34 posted on 10/25/2010 4:17:33 PM PDT by Drango (NO-vember is payback for April 15th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: South40

NPR’s [spokeswoman Dana Davis] Rehm warned that if Congress cut off funding, “stations across the country would be hurt by that and would have to make up that balance elsewhere. In many places that would be difficult to do.”

She said that threats to cut off funding are “inappropriate” but that NPR takes them seriously and is talking with its member stations. “Stations as a whole are not happy this is happening at this time,” she said. “They’re in a difficult situation.”


35 posted on 10/25/2010 4:26:46 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
I mentioned the defunding of NPR when I sent my original email. So she was, in a sense, responding to that. And when she did she said they've received no federal funding since 1983. Moreover, Dana Davis Rehm, the very woman who wrote this email has stated publicly that it would be inappropriate to cut off funding. Clearly that flies in the face of her statement wherein she says they do not receive it.

I know how liberals love to parse words. But I told her I supported the defunding. She responded by saying they don't get and simultaneously released a statement condemning the idea of defunding. That was not parsing words, it was a lie.

36 posted on 10/25/2010 5:01:11 PM PDT by South40 (Spread my work ethic not my wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: South40
Liberals lie carelessly because they know the MSM will look the other way for them.

Ir Rush had lied this outrageously, it would be in every newspaper... tomorrow.

37 posted on 10/25/2010 7:03:43 PM PDT by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
The left has the right to use their 'speech' to try to shut us down - as long as they don't use the law to do it. And where we all have freedom of speech, we DON'T all have the right to a radio or TV show.

That said, NPR needs to be de-funded. It's outrageous that in this day and age they would be receiving tax dollars when there's thousands of media outlets. Why one political party would be able to control the content of 'public' radio and TV is beyond me...

38 posted on 10/25/2010 7:19:54 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: South40

Juan’s better off. Now he has experienced the hypocrisy of the rabid left. He will distance himself and play out a nice spot at FNC and make buckets of money for this...the wonderful result of the remaining free market.

What has and is happening is exactly what should happen!


39 posted on 10/25/2010 7:22:47 PM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surfer
Now he has experienced the hypocrisy of the rabid left.

As have many leftists who like him. I know many liberals who are not happy with his firing. It's always good to see rats turn on each other. :-)

40 posted on 10/25/2010 7:24:56 PM PDT by South40 (Spread my work ethic not my wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Ir Rush had lied this outrageously, it would be in every newspaper... tomorrow.

If Rush had lied this outrageously, they'd be breaking into Monday Night Football to announce it.

41 posted on 10/25/2010 7:28:31 PM PDT by South40 (Spread my work ethic not my wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

I agree with you in theory about the people having freedom and the right to voice opinion, I am just saying that there is no right to tell lies, whether it is slander or other vicious lies that attempt to discredit anyone or any organization or distance one from statements, if those statements were truly made.

Free speech has always had limits.


42 posted on 10/25/2010 7:38:33 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: South40
If Rush had lied this outrageously, they'd be breaking into Monday Night Football to announce it.

Started laughing when I read your comment - then felt a rush of pain as I realized you might be right...

43 posted on 10/25/2010 7:39:56 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
I'm at the point where I don't want my tax dollars supporting the speech rights of one party - and not the other. It's an outrage for many reasons...

It's time to de-fund NPR.

44 posted on 10/25/2010 7:45:46 PM PDT by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: South40
Unfortunately, this has occurred several times in other media. Our decision to end our contractual relationship with Juan has come after repeated conversations and warnings about some of his public comments. This was a difficult, but principled decision.

Bull. It's all about one thing and one thing only:

FOX NEWS

They HATE it. They HATE, HATE, HATE, HATE, HATE "FAUX" NEWS!

I have never seen so MUCH displaced anger against one television network as I have seen from Leftists regarding Fox News. It is pathological. That's right; insane.

I'm trying to figure out why. Fox has so many liberals on it: Geraldo Riveria, Greta Van Sustern, Shep Smith, Bob Betchel, Alan Colmes, Juan Williams, Mara Liasson, Kristen Powers... The number of liberals is as long as the number of conservatives!!!!

Is their outrage based on Fox calling itself "Fair and Balanced", as it illustrates how ALL THE OTHERS are NOT?

(Rhetorical question that has "Yes!" as the obvious answer.)

But seriously folks, they HATE Fox News and they HATE Fox News Viewers. They want the dumb hicks watching Fox to die. Since they don't have the power to do that, they took it out on Juan.

45 posted on 10/25/2010 8:01:18 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must-like men-undergo the fatigue of supporting it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

True...any backing from Government ends up making that speech propaganda.


46 posted on 10/25/2010 9:00:32 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
...any backing from Government ends up making that speech propaganda.

Good point.

47 posted on 10/26/2010 7:01:07 AM PDT by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson