Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steele to Palin Critics: Shut-up!/Would support Palin, if nominee.
CNN Political Ticker ^ | November 1st, 2010 08:43 AM ET | Alexander Mooney

Posted on 11/01/2010 8:27:01 AM PDT by Anamnesis

(CNN) – Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele is defending Sarah Palin against recent attacks Monday, telling CNN that GOP detractors of the former vice presidential nominee need to "shut up." "These Republican leaders who don't put their names in print but make comments in shadows need to shut up," Steele told American Morning's John Roberts Monday. "We're focused on winning elections tomorrow night. We're not focused on 2012."

Steele's comments were in reference to a Politico article out Monday in which a string of unnamed Republicans, feeling Palin could not be a viable presidential contender, said it will be the party's goal to prevent her from running in 2012. Other establishment Republicans have also gone on the record to criticize the former Alaska governor – most recently Karl Rove, who last week said Palin lacks the gravitas to sit in the oval office. But speaking on CNN Monday, Steele said he would be happy if she is the party's standard-bearer in 2012 "If she goes through the process and the Republican primary voters vote for her, absolutely I would be happy," said Steele. "Why wouldn't I be?

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: palin; sarahpalin; steele
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2010 8:27:06 AM PDT by Anamnesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

Michael Steele ... attempting to make himself relevant (by supporting Sarah).


2 posted on 11/01/2010 8:28:45 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (I'm with Jim DeMint ... on the fringe baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

Well, good for Steele.


3 posted on 11/01/2010 8:29:52 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

The first of them would probably be Tokyo Rove.


4 posted on 11/01/2010 8:30:35 AM PDT by sauropod (The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

Why are we even bothering to respond to mythical ‘media sources’ ?

This is a 100% made up story


5 posted on 11/01/2010 8:30:52 AM PDT by Mr. K (All our candidates suck! The media SAYS SO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis
"If she goes through the process and the Republican primary voters vote for her, absolutely I would be happy," said Steele. "Why wouldn't I be?

O'Donnell went through the process. The Republican primary voters gave her the nomination -- and the Party Elite did everything they could to destroy her campaign.

Steele is part of the problem. The tsunami has got to sweep away more than just Democrats.

6 posted on 11/01/2010 8:31:19 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

Compared to, say, that Democratic legend Ted Kennedy, she’s much more intelligent and has a much more stable family life. Try telling that to a lib, and watch them froth at the mouth!


7 posted on 11/01/2010 8:34:00 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The medium is the message.


8 posted on 11/01/2010 8:34:08 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

There was a clip on CNN and he said it. It’s either 1) Steele saw the effectiveness of the Tea Party and palin’s effectiveness AND saw the writing on the wall that elitists like him are done for OR 2) he’s covering his bases in case Palin does win the nomination.

This fool is craftier than Clinton.


9 posted on 11/01/2010 8:34:21 AM PDT by max americana (Hoax and Chains, Dopeychangey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The point is to take over the R party, not replace every single person in it. I’m not saying Steele should stay in his post; maybe he should go. Fine.

But in this instance he said the Right Thing. Doing the Right Thing should be acknowledged as the Right Thing.

Thank you, Michael Steele, for saying what so many of your fellow elitists find it impossible to say.


10 posted on 11/01/2010 8:35:58 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Well, good for Steele.

Gee. That's nice. The Republican Nation Chairman will support Palin if she becomes the Republican Party's nominee in 2012.

I support Palin to be the Republican Party nominee in 2012.

ML/NJ

11 posted on 11/01/2010 8:38:47 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Well, good for Steele.

Gee. That's nice. The Republican Nation Chairman will support Palin if she becomes the Republican Party's nominee in 2012.

I support Palin to be the Republican Party nominee in 2012.

ML/NJ

12 posted on 11/01/2010 8:38:56 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis
"These Republican leaders who don't put their names in print but make comments in shadows need to shut up, We're focused on winning elections tomorrow night. We're not focused on 2012."

At least someone in the RNC gets it. Smart move Michael. Go Rogue.

13 posted on 11/01/2010 8:40:25 AM PDT by McGruff (A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

He also said shut-up to the critics. Good for him.


14 posted on 11/01/2010 8:40:25 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Are Steele and Palin enthusiasm-twins, separated at birth?

“If she goes through the process and the Republican primary voters vote for her, absolutely I would be happy,” said Steele. “Why wouldn’t I be?”

“For the second time in two months ex-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has said she’s willing to run for president. “If there’s nobody else to do it, then of course I would believe that we should do this.”


15 posted on 11/01/2010 8:41:11 AM PDT by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Why are we even bothering to respond to mythical ‘media sources’ ?S

This is a "wedge issue" being created by the MSM. They are trying to cause dissension within the Republican party. Don't give them the satisfaction of falling for this old trick.

16 posted on 11/01/2010 8:41:14 AM PDT by oldbrowser (Rollback Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

These guys are soooooo afraid Palin will get the nomination and then lose. This great thinking got us McKook.


17 posted on 11/01/2010 8:41:30 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
But in this instance he said the Right Thing. Doing the Right Thing should be acknowledged as the Right Thing.

Sorry to be a drag, but I think Steele said the right thing, but was dishonest when he said it. I don't think he is sincere, I don't think he is principled, and I don't plan to ever say anything nice about him.

18 posted on 11/01/2010 8:44:01 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Ok. I’m not going to make a big effort here defending Steele.

I do like that he said this, though. Whatever his motives.


19 posted on 11/01/2010 8:46:28 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: anton

I think perhaps they’re more afraid she’ll get the nomination, and WIN”


20 posted on 11/01/2010 8:48:22 AM PDT by VAarea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson