Posted on 11/08/2010 10:32:14 AM PST by gwjack
Constitutional amendment is unconstitutional??
how exactly?
CAIR understands the important of this: it erects a firewall against the gradual implementation of Sharia. If the amendment stands, it will becpome a model nationwide and it will spur an elightened disucssion of Islam and Sharia. They want to fly under the radar.
Response: Yep. A disaster on the bench.
Translation fro her academic qualifications: She never went to a real School with credentials that would allow legitimate study of the 'Law'( not U.S Law anyway).
A certificate from the University of Ghana qualifies her to drink Jim Jones' Kool-Aid.
The overwhelming majority of Students at Howard University still think O.J. was not guilty. So much for their 'Law Review'.
Conclusion: Typical of the quality of Federal Judges that President Clinton appointed when everybody was watching Monica and her worn out Knee-pads.
again!!! way too much of this judicial legislating crap all across this country. DEM appointed judges in general are a huge problem to our liberty and self governance
So much for the liberation of women.
Can’t wait for the first case in Oklahoma where the Muslim man’s defense is that he had to murder his wife/daughter under the dictates of Sharia honor killing.
Clinton?
Which one - Bill or Hillary?
Did she “do” Bill first?
How can the election board be prevented from certifying the election results if the question is a matter of constitutionality, not a question of whether or not the election was legal (fair)?
I am assuming this case is NOT brought on grounds of voting irregularities.
This doesn't ban Islam. It bans the use of Sharia in court, which could be used to harm non-Muslims and women, which would violate the US Constitution's currently guaranteed equal protection.
But even if it were an amendment to the US Constitution, somehow a liberal judge would find a way to throw it out as unconstitutional. If you're putting it in the Constitution, that would mean it's unconstitutional right now, so the act of trying to put it into the Constitution is unconstitutional. Nice catch-22.
Then, how is it that other states have such laws?
Cut off the judges hands for stealing freedom
The jihadis know how to defeat us from within. They use liberalism as a weapon against what was once a great country.
They are idiots.
Of course you cannot decide our cases on the basis of some other country’s laws.
And you can’t impose another system of law on our country unless you are acknowledging that you have had your legal system overthrown.
The people voted in Oklahoma, and as if California’s overturned electorate isn’t enough, this court is not just throwing it in their face; it’s shoving it down their throats.
You forgot Women’s Studies lecturer, a sure sign of a vacuous liberal.
What I find entertaining is that she’s a liberal woman, the bane of Muslims. I’d love to do a Christmas Carol and bring her into the future, showing her life as a dhimmi woman, with no real rights whatsoever, forced to cover up in public, being raped by Muslim men at will with no recourse. It would be back to the Jim Crow days for her, 100 times worse.
The liberal love for Muslims is the most horrific example of mass dementia I have ever seen. It’s a group of people literally supporting their own enslavement or death.
That was fast. Too fast.
“remover her and JAIL HER for 20 years at hard labor. “
Well, I think removal and then a lifetime ban for her using cosmetic products would be enough to ruin her life.
It’s about time for the chicken feathers to meet the hot tar...
Like blowing up dogs and humans for the sake of Allah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.