Hannity Interviews George W. Bush (video)

“Im not a huge Hannity fan anymore myself. I watched him last night, but generally I wont turn him on anymore. I dont like how he bullies people around he doesnt agree with and his panel, with that annoying football he plays with is just boring.”

Yup. I used to like him, but now if I watch his show, it`s usually just to hear what his guests have to say. I wanted to hear what Bush had to say,,,not Hannity. And you`re right. If a guest does`nt agree with him, he will try to bully/ridicule them. I don`t know what gives with the football, either. Maybe he`s fantasizing that he`s a great NFL quarterback. lol If I happen to be watching, I immediately change channels the moment he grabs that football. lol

When you compliment your wife do you preface your statement with: Even though you’re ‘abit overweight and talk too much, . . . . . . ?]

well, I like Dubya, I really do. But, I didn't marry him! LOL

But you are right that we shoud drop all unnecessary disclaimers when stating our appreciation for the man. We have enough wild-eyed lunatics around here working above and beyond the call of Bush Derangement Syndrome that we don't need to repeat our own disagreements with this good man every time.

Whatever Hannity is or isn't if The LORD knows he should be our next President (and I mean if), for whatever reason, he will be. The LORD's purposes in what He does will be met by whatever means or people He deems to fulfill them.

I do get tired of the "he lacks depth" thing as I watch him almost everyday and find this to be untrue. It is said because he repeats himself often and he has big named RINOs on his show. In this day and age if you don't repeat yourself really often if there is a significant point you are trying to get out to the public it will be lost in the shuffle of the incredible amounts of informationa and disinformation that is pumped out daily into the public.

Hannity has also taken down RINO opinions masterfully as of late concerning Palin, other Tea Party candidates and McCain not supporting the Bush Tax cuts to name a few things. He has them on but cuts down their points of views no matter who they are when they expose themselves as the RINOs that they are.

The whole thing "he lacks depth" reminds me of all the liberals who thing that intellectualism is what is important. They always claim their leaders are highly intellectual and that ours are stupid because we do not hem and haw and mask our true intentions behind big words that amount to lies. We tend to speak more plainly and mean what we say. Truth is not nearly as complicated as lies.

It is hard to argue given your premise.
Please note that I am as far from a liberal as you can get. Lightweights are lightweights regardless of on which end of the political spectrum they exist. Ronald Reagan was no lightweight - read his letters and radio scripts. You do not need to be deeply read in political philosophy to be a political thinker of substance - Maggie Thatcher and Reagan were both deep political thinkers. John Bolton is no lightweight. Despite the theatrics, Glenn Beck is no lightweight. The odious and despicable Bill Clinton was no lightweight. Sean Hannity is a lightweight as is Barack Obama. It is as simple as that.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.