Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

McConnell flips on earmarks, now he says he wants them banned. Has he really seen the light, or is it just pandering?
1 posted on 11/15/2010 10:35:46 PM PST by FredJake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FredJake

Its not going to last too long.


2 posted on 11/15/2010 10:37:31 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

Perhaps there’s some hope for McConnell, but not in a leadership position. Bush’s book notes that McConnell advised a losing withdrawal from Iraq. McConnell isn’t fit to spit shine Harry Reid’s shoes. Repubs need a new minority leader in the Senate.


3 posted on 11/15/2010 10:39:21 PM PST by skookum55 ("We can give up on America or we can give up on this president ...." D. D'Souza)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

Is he up for reelection in 2012? If so that would explain his decision. Rand Paul prooves the tea party is very strong in Kentucky.


4 posted on 11/15/2010 10:46:16 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

...Any way the wind blows...


5 posted on 11/15/2010 10:49:41 PM PST by Tagurit (Are your pigs fed, watered and ready to fly?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake
Me thinks with all the new blood showing up this week for congressional orientation, he has been scared straight.


6 posted on 11/15/2010 11:03:29 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

is it pandering or is it simply representing the will of his constituency? So long as they do what we want, I don’t care what you call it. This will be a fine first step towards reighning in the out of control spending. I would like to see the balanced budget amendment to the US constitution come back too. Let’s see if they want to get really serious.


7 posted on 11/15/2010 11:06:21 PM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

Perhaps McConnell thinks he can quiet down those perky Tea Partiers with this sop. Earmarks weren’t much of the budget, in the great scheme of things. It help keep everything nice and quiet while the Committee Assignments and other important procedural decisions get made.


9 posted on 11/15/2010 11:09:00 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

BS.

He will find a way to torpedo them and still claim he voted for reform.

It might go something like “If you will vote in opposition to this I could do this for you”.

He will even go to the Congress and razzle dazzle them.


10 posted on 11/15/2010 11:13:54 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

Any leader that needs to be LED/PRODDED to do what’s right, should be forced out in primaries for someone who KNOWS right from wrong.

Even this McConnell character.


12 posted on 11/15/2010 11:34:40 PM PST by ROTB (Without a Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia during armed revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake
The issue is spending and all the fuss about earmarks is a distraction. 4000 earmarks do not increase the federal deficit one red cent. The money was already allocated; earmarks simply say where it will be going.

If those who have a thing about earmarks wanted to make sensible changes in the way appropriations are handled, this is the time to do it. But grandstanding as an earmarks foe will not balance the budget, as all earmarks combined comprise less than 2% of total government spending. I suspect Sen. McConnell is well aware of this fact.

Sen. Jim Inhofe defends earmarks. He'd rather Congress decide where taxpayers' funds be spent than a faceless bureaucrat.

13 posted on 11/15/2010 11:37:13 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake; IMissPresidentReagan; CourtneyLeigh; Just Kimberly; Knuckrider; MBohman; ...
Thanks, for the post.
A Kentucky Ping.

...for those interested, :D
he (Mitch) blinked, As always "trust but, verify.".....Ronald Reagan





19 posted on 11/16/2010 1:02:53 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Imam Zer0: DeathCARE, Is my only "health" plan....to hell w/ free enterprise. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake
Pandering? Did you hear him on the radio? There's no going back now.

Yeah, so he looks like Harvey Milquetoast, but at least give the guy some credit.

If he stood firm for earmarks, most of the posts on this thread wouldn't be much different. What a bunch of ingrates.

20 posted on 11/16/2010 1:04:06 AM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake
McConnell agrees to ban earmarks

Translation: McConnell is up for re-election in 2 years......

23 posted on 11/16/2010 5:30:23 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

His future depends on it... so we wait and see. We are an army... they work for us.

LLS


24 posted on 11/16/2010 5:38:17 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson