Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Almost arrested for refusing the TSA pat-down.
Mike Evers

Posted on 11/17/2010 11:22:37 AM PST by Mike Evers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-345 next last
To: kcvl
it was IS going to be a nightmare if WHEN that happened HAPPENS
121 posted on 11/17/2010 12:12:34 PM PST by pillut48 (Israel doesn't have a friend in President Obama...and neither does the USA! (h/t pgkdan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
He is the perfect profile of everyone's favorite "soft target" the middle aged white male.

Good point. Profiling already exists in airports. Just not the correct kind.

122 posted on 11/17/2010 12:13:35 PM PST by 444Flyer ("The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power." -Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

http://www.dontscan.us/

http://www.optoutday.com/";

Not enough. We need our TEA Party people to express order “Don’t Touch My Junk” t-shirts and visit their local airport- shop, eat, visit the news stand, etc. for a bit of civil disobedience that is perfectly legal. If the t-shirts take to long to arrive, plenty of cities have places that can make them.


123 posted on 11/17/2010 12:13:38 PM PST by pops88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers

Bush deserves a lot of blame for this. Previously, if you argued with the screeners you were arguing with a rent-a-cop. When the real cops were called it was rent-a-cop vs. citizen.

Now, as the TSA thugs so clearly explained to you they are “Federal Security Employees”, and the local Police are in the position of backing up fellow LEOs, not rent a cops.

I know this is easy for me to say, but you should have insisted they arrest you. It would greatly have clarified things all around. Someone else will have the opportunity soon, I’m sure.


124 posted on 11/17/2010 12:14:16 PM PST by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim; Mike Evers

Right after 9/11, they instituted the second check, at the boarding gate, just before pax got aboard the flight.

On a BWI to TPA flight, they pulled 17 of out of line for the “Secondary Screening.” 17 middle-age White males.

I asked the TSA leader why us. I got the standard “the computer selected you” answer.

I pressed him, and he asked “You military?” I answered, “Two tours ‘Nam.”

He said, “Desert Storm for me. The real answer? You guys don’t bitch.”


125 posted on 11/17/2010 12:15:49 PM PST by MindBender26 (Fighting the "con" in Conservatism on FR since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers

Might I say that you may a cause for legal relief.

Your paid ticket, confirmed by the boarding pass you showed the TSA, is a binding contract between you and the carrier. A third-party cannot nullify that contract by its independent actions. (or am I incorrect in the Age of Obamugabe?)


126 posted on 11/17/2010 12:17:20 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Islam is a violent and tyrannical political ideology and has nothing to do with "religion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers

What will you do if it or similar happens again? Would you do anything different, or you don’t quite know yet?


127 posted on 11/17/2010 12:17:26 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers; roaddog727

Call Bill and John Mica too!

Did you ping Stephan?

He is in Gitmo.


128 posted on 11/17/2010 12:18:14 PM PST by MindBender26 (Fighting the "con" in Conservatism on FR since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: relictele
Re: Refusal to submit to federal authority.

Amendment 9
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

129 posted on 11/17/2010 12:18:40 PM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Make Nov 24 the “drive through the airport real slow” day, even if you have no other reason to go to the a/p.


130 posted on 11/17/2010 12:18:51 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PERKY2004

bring plenty of dollars with you....for tips


131 posted on 11/17/2010 12:19:37 PM PST by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers
Facing certain arrest if I refused to submit to their police tactics...

That is the next logical step. Someone will have to force their hand and be arrested before anything will change.

We have to see what the entire arrest process looks like. How will TSA handle the arrest? What will be the charge? How will the media cover it? Will this be a felony? Will being arrested for "refusal to obey a federal officer" result in someone losing their voting rights over some TSA punk in an airport?

Don't just Cloward-Piven the pat-down areas by refusing the scanners, refuse the aggressive pat-downs and Cloward-Piven the arrest process and holding areas, too.

Nobody should be compelled by the federal government to give up their rights or be arrested, for any reason.

-PJ

132 posted on 11/17/2010 12:20:03 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
IF A TSA AGENT GETS HIS/HER ASS KICKED EVERY HOUR as citizens "defend themselves" from sexual assault then this nonsense will eventually stop. I plan on flying to CA in December, and I will not let anyone grope, assault my wife or my young son. Am I willing to go to jail? YES. Will I? I hope not. Luckily I have friends in both arrival and destination.
133 posted on 11/17/2010 12:20:17 PM PST by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers; CatDancer

bflr— and will look for an update here to see whether you make it through uneventfully this afternoon.

Best to you...


134 posted on 11/17/2010 12:20:20 PM PST by green pastures (Cynicism-- it's not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

(CRAZY) Dem Sen: Pat downs are just ‘love pats’...

“I’m wildly excited that I can walk through a machine instead of getting my dose of love pats,” Sen. (Claire) McCaskill said.

******

Leader of TSA offers pat downs to senators...

The head of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) offered on Wednesday to have airport screeners come to Capitol Hill to give senators a pat-down so they could fully understand the mechanics of the newly deployed, controversial technique.

John Pistole told senators on the Senate Science, Commerce and Transportation Committee that he “insisted” on receiving the pat-down to “experience what that involves so that we would know before we rolled it out,” and added that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has gotten a pat-down as well.

“Honestly, any member who has not experienced that pat-down [and] who would like to do that — I would not offer it — but an experienced qualified security officer would be glad to do that,” Pistole said.


135 posted on 11/17/2010 12:23:05 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Interesting theory.

Tortious interference with contract would do, but I suppose there is some fine print in my ticket that subjugates me to the TSA rules.

This pat-down controversy is not going to die down. I plan to pursue this issue until it is recinded. I figure a couple of weeks and it will be history.


136 posted on 11/17/2010 12:23:05 PM PST by Mike Evers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

Don’t believe the TSA website. Tyner said San Diego wasn’t listed and they did have them.


137 posted on 11/17/2010 12:23:05 PM PST by pacpam (action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I am assuming that somewhere in the small print on your ticketing agreement that you have forfeited that fourth amendment.


138 posted on 11/17/2010 12:25:43 PM PST by ponygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it..."

It seems to me that the DHS generally, and TSA specifically, need to be reminded that We the People are the sovereign, and when WE say no, then the behaviors that caused us to utter that negative must stop. That "long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism" that this government has decided to embark upon must be stopped, lest the next portion of that sentence be enacted. "it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

That document created this country, and never has been 'revoked'. The US Constitution merely created a form of government, and can be changed by us whenever we decide.

Again, it is time to remind them that WE are the rulers here, not them. This last election didn't seem to convince them of that fact.

139 posted on 11/17/2010 12:26:34 PM PST by ex 98C MI Dude (Alea Iacta Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers
I've said this on other threads:

What is TSA going to do when instead of trying to get explosives on an aircraft, terrorist just detonate one in the crowded lines waiting to be inspected?

140 posted on 11/17/2010 12:27:12 PM PST by BulletBobCo (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-345 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson