I agree. It's not clear where reality ends and wild speculation begins with "Ulsterman". Anonymous news is not as good as signed stories, but we're not going to get anyone inside the Zero MalAdministration to spill the beans the way Ulsterman has. If even 1/2 of it is accurate it's pretty damning stuff.
Last episode he reported A) a huge scandal was brewing B) Obama was disengaged, and spent a lot of time watching basketball C) Obama was on anti-depressants D) Michelle, her Mom and Valerie Jarrett were making many decisions in his name E) Cabinet members were discussing invoking which ever article of the Constitution is used to remove an incapacitated President, but Biden was against it (due to it causing chaos.)
I agree that list sounds a bit far fetched.... but we don't really know and it's fun to read and think about.
One half of it is accurate, but only because "Ulsterman" is rather obviously weaving his own inventions around other news reports, without of course acknowledging the later, or distinguishing between the two.
Notice you NEVER get anything genuinely new or definitive or confirmable out of Ulsterman. It's all hints never spelled out, riddles never solved, and promises of more to follow never fulfilled.
No, I obviously can't absolutely prove Ulsterman doesn't have some (inexplicably coy) "inside source," but to me the game he's playing with his readers is pretty transparent. I don't understand how anyone retains any patience with b.s. like this which never pays off.