Posted on 11/24/2010 9:50:22 PM PST by InvisibleChurch
I know one thing for certain. Eric Holder is a racist. He is, therefore, unfit for the job he holds - or any other position of public service.
Beyond that fact, which is indisputable, further speculation about his beliefs is of no interest to me.
I agree with your definitions! But ultimately, even the hatred based racist uses the “cause” for some gain. The racist who never expresses a word or deed displaying their racism. Indeed their racism in many ways might be MORE vile, but they never act on it and never create it in the world in reality. That person has a personal opinion they are keeping to themselves. It never affects anyone else. And make no mistake, I am NOT condoning racism in any form. I hate racism personally, I was a victim of it as a child.
A racist ACTS on their feelings in a way that creates it in the world. Thats done in words and deeds, and that person is a racist. They made it real in their own universe and that of others in order to gain something. What? Who the heck knows, but it was enough for them to go and make it real enough for others to sense.
I should have been a bit more clear.
That card was played very effectively on the Clintons!
Now it's played the same way on Congress by Jack Maskell!!
Even the judiciary is played that card, ---the RACE CARD, including the "talking heads' and their guests!!!
When the new Congress takes office, it will be much harder for the dems to circle their wagons!
Yakkity Yak will be the undoing of Holder and Obama’s lies...LOL. The dude just can’t help himself....he has a big mouth and wants to be seen.
Too bad somebody didn’t ‘Unfriend’ that dude when Kimmel ran the Unfriend telethon...lol!! What a loser!
UPDATES:
USCCR Michael Yaki twitter:
# @daveweigel #Wikileaks is so undershooting when it could be uncovering the damning smoking gun cables in the #newblackpanther case. 10:01 PM Nov 28th via Twitter for BlackBerry® in reply to daveweigel
# #Wikileaks is so undershooting when it could be uncovering the damning smoking gun cables in the #newblackpanther case. 9:59 PM Nov 28th via Twitter for BlackBerry®
...
# #usccr approves #newblackpanther report. Only 3 more weeks until reinforcements are supposed to arrive if #obamaappointees show up. 7:26 AM Nov 19th via Twitter for BlackBerry®
//
http://biggovernment.com/jcadams/2010/12/02/pigford-and-new-black-panthers-friends-at-doj/
Pigford and New Black Panthers: Friends at DOJ
by J. Christian Adams
At the Justice Department, one man has played a central role in two of the most controversial racialist policies of the Obama Administration – Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli. This bundler of huge campaign contributions for the Obama Campaign is now the second highest ranking Presidential appointee at the Justice Department. Perrelli is best known for his central role in dismissing the slam dunk voter intimidation case brought and dropped against the New Black Panther Party. But the leftist Perrelli has outdone himself.
(snip)
Perrelli became the administration cheerleader for a colossal payout to the Hispanic, Indian and black farmer claimants. And just like the Pigford and Keepseagle claimants, the New Black Panthers seemed to have friends in high places inside Justice.
Perrelli played the central role in rushing a resolution to these claims before the Republicans took control of the purse strings in January. Instead of fighting hard to limit the exposure of the United States, the claimants had a fellow traveler on the opposite side of the negotiating table.
Similarly, Perrelli was behind the dismissal of the already won DOJ case against the New Black Panthers who organized and ran an armed voter intimidation effort the day Obama was elected. Justice officials acted as advocates for the New Black Panthers more than they sought to protect the ballot box from armed thugs.
Did Perrelli’s zeal to have the case dismissed have anything to do with the New Black Panther’s endorsement of candidate Obama during the primaries?
Judicial Watch sued the DOJ under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain Black Panther documents. They uncovered stacks of emails between Perrelli and his top political lieutenants supervising the lawsuit. They reveal Justice Department political appointees, including Perrelli, intimately involved behind the scenes in driving the dismissal.
Of course the documents contradict testimony given under oath over and over again to Congress and the Civil Rights Commission that only career civil servants were involved in the dismissal. This accuracy-challenged testimony came from both Attorney General Eric Holder and Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez.
(snip)
//
//
WTH???
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/2/justice-department-road-trip/
EDITORIAL: Justice Department road trip
Bureaucrats provide a peanut gallery for an unjust case
The Justice Department’s Voting Section chief, Chris Herren, sent an e-mail on Wednesday encouraging 97 of his employees (including secretaries) to use paid work time to attend oral arguments in a case unrelated to most of their individual responsibilities. This reflects what little regard Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.’s team has for American taxpayers and individual voters.
(snip)
//
http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/12/02/u-s-loses-world-cup-to-qatar/
U.S. Loses World Cup to…Qatar
by Publius
President Obama dispatched former President Bill Clinton and, mysteriously available, Attorney General Eric Holder to Zurich to bolster the U.S.’s bid for the 2022 World Cup.
(snip)
//
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-levine/listen-holder_b_791191.html
Say it ain’t so, Eric Holder. After protecting George Bush and Bush era war criminals from justice - in plain violation of American and international law, and common decency - you are now talking about prosecuting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, notwithstanding that pesky First Amendment and the fact that you probably don’t have jurisdiction anyway. And God help heroic Bradley Manning, the alleged leaker, once the army is done with him and your Justice Department gets to work.
(snip)
Michele Bachmann: Time for Attorney General Eric Holder to Resign
//
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30653
Where were Eric Holder and Obama when earlier this year WikiLeaks distributed, twice, documents that identified Afghanistan informants aiding the United States at their personal peril, and video of Iraqi collateral deaths, including two Reuters’s photographers killed by a U.S. Apache helicopter. It is an absolute tragedy, and a sometimes preventable tragedy, when collateral damage happens, and it will, during a war. Not to diminish the horror of civilian deaths, but, like the WikiLeaks recent document dump, there is no context accompanying the video. Involvement in war at the battle, scene level, has the assumptive risk of death. War is vile, war is dirty, war is hell, war is death, and sometimes that death is indiscriminate. This is where Eric Holder was: the Obama administration was not embarrassed, the State Department was not embarrassed, Holder was directed to act. That is where Eric Holder was when lives and our military were put at risk by WikiLeaks the first two times.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-turn/2010/12/morning_bits_3.html
Sometimes nothing goes right. We lose the World Cup to a “not free” country. “America’s bid to host the 2022 World Cup has fallen short. But it wasn’t for lack of trying: Eric Holder has been in Zurich, advocating for the competition to be hosted by the U.S., and the attorney general was joined by Bill Clinton and actor Morgan Freeman. . . The affair is altogether reminiscent of the Obama administration’s last foray into sports, when the president himself went to Denmark to convince the International Olympics Committee that the games should be played in Chicago. Then, too, the White House came up short. Freedom House awards Qatar a ‘not free’ rating. And one can’t help but wonder whether Iran will be providing security (since the two nations recently signed a major security deal) and whether Israel, should its national team qualify for the competition, be allowed even to enter Qatar, as it would be a violation of the Arab boycott.”
//
This is HUGE and SERIOUS ...
Several Kinston residents filed suit against Justice, claiming that Section 5 is unconstitutional. The Justice Department filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming that the residents don’t have standing to challenge the department’s decision. Kinston’s Democratic town officials were very happy with Justice’s decision to void the citizen referendum and refused to sue Justice to overturn the decision.
On Friday, oral argument on the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss will be held at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 of the federal courthouse in D.C. The Chief of the Voting Section has sent an email inviting the entire Voting Section staff to attend. That’s a clear indication of how important the career ideologues in the Section think this case is to their future, continued employment. Former Voting Section lawyer Christian Adams observes there is “no legitimate job related purpose” to this field trip. Why pay for 89 career civil servants to watch a case that the vast majority of them are not assigned to? Have they nothing else to do?
Yeah, that stuck out at me as well. I always argued against the term “reverse discrimination” for the same reason, now do I have to start all over again?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.