Oregon fire raises Muslims' fears of attack backlash

The Columbus Dispatch ^ | Sunday 28 November 2010 | By JONATHAN COOPER and NIGEL DUARA

[rdcbn]

Pretty much a twofer - destroy any incriminating evidence while at the same time letting them play the victim in a PR offensive

[17th Miss Regt]

Or perhaps a "progressive" looking to incite an issue, and to put conservatives on the defensive?

Possible, but I'll bet on the muzzies.

[Captainpaintball]

AFFIRMATIVE FICTION!!!

[Slump Tester]

I think they did it to themselves to destroy evidence and play the victim card. (A win-win for them.)

[Seaplaner]

Hopefully the forensic folks can find enough evidence to reel in the true perp or perps. It will certainly be interesting.

[ZULU]

The way to deal with these bastards is to expel them back to the places which spawned them - and the way to get that accomplished is to educate Americans of every Non-Islamic faith to their past and current acts of hatred and to which of those damn prostitutes sitting in elected office have received Muslim money and how much AND HOW IT HAS AND IS influencing their voting records.

[Drew68]

Look to the state department for starters.

Yep, I imagine on the books somewhere is a law that no American got to vote on that defines "refugee" status and outlines an obligation for the United States to take care of these people. It's likely a law that few Americans even know about until they wake up one morning to see their once quaint small town looking like Mogadishu.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

Oregon fire raises Muslims' fears of attack backlash

Since 9/11, every time some Muslim commits or is arrested for trying to commit some terrorist act, we hear 10 times more about Muslim fears of a backlash than we do about the actual terrorist act. It doesn't seem to matter that the backlash never happens - for the US media, Muslim fears of a backlash are far more newsworthy than the acts of terrorism committed by Muslims which make a "backlash" thinkable in the first place.

[radu]

That’s pretty much how it went with the M-boro fire (they set a bulldozer afire). It was all over the news until the word came out one of the local muzzies did it. Then BLIP - it disappeared from the newscasts.

[kromike]

If true, pay attention Muzzies. Not so much fun when you're on the receiving end, eh? Well, it's long overdue.

You'll get sympathy from Obamolester, the Obama Media and the Obama Democrats.

No one else will care about your hurt feewings.

[smoothsailing]

Oregon fire raises Muslims' fears of attack backlash

Rageboy strikes again.

[Vendome]

[fuzzthatwuz]

"Mohamud was being held on charges of plotting to carry out a terror attack Friday on a crowd of thousands".

Guess he is not considered chargeable for a "hate crime", yet the DA will aggressively investigate and consider similar charges as a result of the "alleged" retribution arson.

[Seaplaner]

Possible, but I'll bet on the muzzies.

After further review ... I now believe that you are correct.

[redpoll]

OMG. Or, better yet, OMFG. Yes, it’s vulgar.

Retaliation against people trying to kill me is bad? WTF?

See, I’m so upset I’ve run out of Internet acronyms.

[Lil Flower]

** Intentionally set to destroy evidence before a search warrant could be served?**

Ding ding ding!! We have a winner!

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

People are waking up.I hope that its not too late.Time will tell.

[Vendome]

I can show you were 30 or so of them live right here in San Jose.

[budwiesest]

Strange, those from whom the terrorists most likely spawn are afraid of ‘terror’ being used against them. The irony.

[Godwin1]

Nonsense: this is doubtless a fabrication, staged by the Muslims themselves to change the subject and turn the aggressors into victims. They have done this repeatedly.