Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Defends WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange
Third Age ^ | December 3, 2010

Posted on 12/04/2010 7:07:52 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) is defending WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's release of thousands of classified diplomatic cables.

In an interview with Fox Business Thursday, Paul went against the opinions of many of his Republican colleagues, asserting that Assange should be given the same protections as the media.

"In a free society we're supposed to know the truth," Paul said. "In a society where truth becomes treason, then we're in big trouble. And now, people who are revealing the truth are getting into trouble for it."

“This whole notion that Assange, who's an Australian, that we want to prosecute him for treason. I mean, aren't they jumping to a wild conclusion?” he added. “This is media, isn't it? I mean, why don't we prosecute The New York Times or anybody that releases this?"

Earlier this week, Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Justice Department is investigating Assange's case to determine whether he can be charged with a crime for leaking the secret documents.

Arkansas Goveror Mike Huckabee went so far as to say Tuesday that Assange should be tried for treason and face the death penalty if proven guilty.

Most U.S. politicians claim that the leaked cables will damage relations with U.S. allies.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 111th; 911truthers; apaulling; assange; bradleymanning; climategate; congress; fraudpaul; fulltimeapologists; globalwarminghoax; julianassange; losertarian; patbuchanan; paultardation; ronpaul; skinheadsonfr; texas; traitorronpaul; wikigate; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-197 next last
To: atc23
Yeah, thats kinda why I'm for it. War? what war?

Now that's putting the 'tard' in Paultard!

161 posted on 12/04/2010 10:25:10 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (I'm with Jim DeMint ... on the fringe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux

Mash here...IMHO...this it what this is all about....Obozo’s handlers know exactly what they’re doing...and so does theRinocratic Oligarchy..

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/130197-fcc-may-regulate-internet-lines-days-before-christmas


162 posted on 12/04/2010 10:26:35 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
I agree with everything you say except for this statement

“.......vast majority of them classified to hide the truth from the American public, the secrets covertly justify/protect bad policy decisions and actions.......”

That VAST majority of classification is done because it's easier to classify things then to spend time reading the arcane rules and regs on whether the topic should be classified or not!

The numbers do tell a story, but its not quite as sinister as you think. Much material is over classified and there is material that's classified by one agency and not by another. Yes there are examples of documents classified to hide stupidity but its not as common as you think. Its hard to classify bad policy decisions because when the “policy maker” makes his/her decision and the policy implemented the consequences are usually public maybe not immediately but eventually it's “out there” for all to see. The “system” is set up to classify even the most innocuous or mundane communication unless the document creator takes action to prevent it.Human beings being what the are its easier to take no action then to take action.

Like dumbing deviancy down to “acceptability” and then relaxing the security rules to accommodate the new norm. The consequences might not be immediate but eventually it has to be dealt with.

163 posted on 12/04/2010 10:38:29 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Bookwoman
I agree. Originally the press was supposed to be part of the checks and balances. Honest reporting was to keep government from getting out of hand. We all know how that has worked out, with the press protecting government corruption. There is no way we can know the whole truth of who is behind all this and what the purposes are, but we have to ask ourselves, in the long run isn’t it better that evil and incompetence are revealed? It isn’t only US secrets that have been told.

"I would like to call upon America to be more careful with its trust to prevent those pundits who are attempting to establish fine degrees of justice and even finer legal shades of equality (some because of their distorted outlook, others because of short-sightedness, still others out of self-interest)to prevent them from using the struggle for peace and social justice to lead you down a false road.

They are trying to weaken you; they are trying to disarm your strong and magnificent country in the face of this fearful threat -- one which has never before been seen in the history or the world. Not only in the history of the country, but in the history of the world."


Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in "Warning to The West" 1976
164 posted on 12/04/2010 10:47:21 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn
But if AG Holder were doing his job, rather than going off to Geneva for the World Cup negotiations

But.. But,. LOOK how successful Holder was! Through tough negotiation, he was able to secure the World Cup.... for Russia!

165 posted on 12/04/2010 10:48:34 AM PST by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
You can't fix stupid crazy.
166 posted on 12/04/2010 11:06:32 AM PST by Stultis (Democrats. Still devoted to the three S's: Slavery, Segregation and Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux
Why Freepers would favor secrecy for the bloated, tyrannical government that hopes to enslave us in a global governance nightmare is beyond me.

My only complaint about the guy is that he didn’t do more, didn’t expose the workings of other international players, other governments, NGOs, the UN, corporate, financial, religious, academic and media behemoths in bed with the political and regulatory appartchiks in our own out of control tyranny.

*Applause*

167 posted on 12/04/2010 11:15:51 AM PST by Conservative Tsunami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
You can't fix stupid crazy.

So....? Ron White was wrong??

168 posted on 12/04/2010 11:17:58 AM PST by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: All

This is all just wrong. This b*st*rd, using stolen documents, has put confidential informants to unnecessary deadly risk. This also puts at risk some of our troops and intel people. Also, our future intel gathering and future credibility is damaged. But to many this is all just hunky dory, since he SAYS he is going to publish info regarding banks.

Evil is evil. He is on the side of al-qaeda, not us. But that is OK, Ron Paul seems to be on their side too, along with many, here on FR.

DG


169 posted on 12/04/2010 11:21:21 AM PST by DoorGunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in "Warning to The West" 1976

Thanks. A warning well worth heeding:

"Prevent those pundits...from using the struggle for peace and social justice to lead you down a false road.

"They are trying to weaken you; they are trying to disarm your strong and magnificent country in the face of this fearful threat -- one which has never before been seen in the history or the world. Not only in the history of the country, but in the history of the world."


170 posted on 12/04/2010 11:22:05 AM PST by Conservative Tsunami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

EXACTLY! The media’s job is to publish information, and Wikileaks is media. They’ve even gone as far as NOT publishing info that would endanger lives; people haven’t taken time to read their website and policies. Gov employees are another matter altogether.


171 posted on 12/04/2010 11:24:42 AM PST by gotribe (Time to partea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Its hard to classify bad policy decisions because when the “policy maker” makes his/her decision and the policy implemented the consequences are usually public maybe not immediately but eventually it’s “out there” for all to see.

If only this were true. Wikileaks exposed lies through omission about North Korea, Iran, Saudis, Israel, Palestine, China, Syria, etc... the omission of the truth allowed weak policy decisions, non-response to growing threats / attacks, and dangerous inaction from our policy makers.


172 posted on 12/04/2010 11:39:58 AM PST by BushCountry (I spoken many wise words in jest, but no comparison to the number of stupid words spoken in earnest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: DoorGunner

damn well said DG. If your screenname reflects your military service, thank you sir for this service to our country.


173 posted on 12/04/2010 12:02:11 PM PST by Servant of the Cross (I'm with Jim DeMint ... on the fringe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That was my first thought as well...

I DO find it hard to fathom how Assange could be charged with Treason against the US seeing as how he is an Australian. However, being an accomplice to disseminating stolen classified documents could surely bring charges of some sort.

What I’d ALSO like to see is someone talking about how Obama did NOTHING to try to stop the leaks — which he had the opportunity to do since at least July. [Assange gave them copies, and asked if there was anything he couldn’t print, or anything that should be redacted...]. As far as I’m concerned Obama and the WH operatives who facilitated this and did nothing to stop it are just as liable as Assange.

One would have to be an idiot to not understand why Obama did nothing to stop the leaks (taking Hillary out of the game). For putting our CIA agents, and other espionage assets in harm’s way — especially in hostile countries — I believe he should be impeached (just one more count against him at this point).


174 posted on 12/04/2010 12:17:34 PM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If we followed Ron Paul's logic, America should have no secrets. He would have Eisenhower revealing the Normandy Invasion plans for all the world to see. There is also such thing as proper procedure. For a PFC to hailed as a national hero for stealing classified information is beyond reason. Ron Paul is a nut.
175 posted on 12/04/2010 12:41:45 PM PST by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoorGunner

Take a look at post 73.

The U.S. Govt. has known for MONTHS Wikileaks has this information. They have that little bstrd Manning.

That they haven’t found out what Manning gave them, or just beat the livin’ sht out of him daily, gone to Wikileaks and said some of this info is going to get people killed and laid out some options to Assange is what is wrong.

Blame your government.


176 posted on 12/04/2010 1:31:00 PM PST by bigheadfred (STAND IN THE CLOSET AND SCREAM WITH ME...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The range of opinions, and official sanctions, on this topic reflect both a desire to know and whose ox is being gored: the military, the diplomatic corps, the banks or either political party. Now that Assange has stepped on powerful toes (Afghan informants are not influential), the law will be applied. The law is fair. Did Assange bribe a government employee? We don’t know yet. Did he knowingly accept and disseminate stolen property and commit telecom offences?. It certainly appears so. The remedies are: turn off his DNS registration (Web access), arrest him and prosecute him. We don’t assassinate people (Executive Order 12333).


177 posted on 12/04/2010 1:36:35 PM PST by Praxeologue (io)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cut and Run is Anti-America and everything we stand for. He is for anything that will make us weaker.


178 posted on 12/04/2010 1:36:49 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Who knows. This certainly won’t win him a lot of supporters.

The only supporters he has ever had are anti-Americans who hate our military power. They wanted to get the chosen one elected to do his bidding for them.
179 posted on 12/04/2010 1:40:50 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wissa

Again, your’s is not the choice you posed. If it’s a U.S. president-—ANY U.S. president-—or someone out to destroy the U.S. through leaks, I’d take the U.S. president. ANY U.S. president.


180 posted on 12/04/2010 1:50:13 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson