Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patents do not protect small firms, says trade body
The Register ^ | 16th December 2010 11:30 GMT | OUT-LAW.COM

Posted on 12/16/2010 9:16:44 AM PST by snarkpup

High-tech SMEs will find it almost impossible to enforce them, says SMEIA

Patents do not give protection to inventive small businesses because they are impossible to enforce, an organisation claiming to represent small technology companies has said.

In an open letter (two-page/486KB PDF) to Government ministers, the group said that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are not able to take advantage of the protection offered by patents.

(Excerpt) Read more at theregister.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: intellectualproperty; patent
Both of the large high-tech companies I have worked for encouraged engineers to apply for "junk" patents on prior art so they could brandish a large portfolio of patents at their competitors. Their moral justification for this was that all their competitors were doing it, so they needed to do so as well in order to defend themselves.

The small high-tech company I worked for was—as discussed in the article—on the other side of this issue. Patent trolls claiming to have patents on basic concepts in computer programming pounced at IPO time (when small companies are most vulnerable to this sort of thing). E.g., one of these trolls claimed they had a patent on the idea of using "sliders" in user interfaces.

1 posted on 12/16/2010 9:16:50 AM PST by snarkpup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

Doesn’t White Castle hold all patent rights on sliders?


2 posted on 12/16/2010 9:19:26 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Doesn’t White Castle hold all patent rights on sliders?

No. According to their web site, slyder® is trademarked, not patented.

3 posted on 12/16/2010 9:29:46 AM PST by snarkpup (We need to replace our politicians before they replace us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

The truth is, it can take 4 years to get a patent but a large company can kill you in a nanosecond with competition. Even if you do get a patent it can take millions to defend in court against a larger company with more dollars.


4 posted on 12/16/2010 9:30:24 AM PST by ully2 (ully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ully2

Actually, large companies almost never assert patents against small companies. It is typically the other way.
Large companies are afraid of getting into litigation as anything can happen (in the counter-suit, they may lose billions in damages, while the small companies may lose only tens of thousands).


5 posted on 12/16/2010 9:53:21 AM PST by heiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

Patents are just a license to hire a lawyer.
Can’t afford a lawyer? - don’t get a patent.


6 posted on 12/16/2010 11:09:11 AM PST by Last Dakotan (Hunting - the ultimate in organic grocery shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

There is a massive difference between trade secrets and patents. It is extremely difficult to protect either anymore except through strict secrecy and that isn’t always possible.


7 posted on 12/16/2010 2:49:36 PM PST by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson