Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/31/2010 3:19:26 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58
The definition of a ponzi scheme...
2 posted on 12/31/2010 3:20:43 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Government forcing the people to take care of their own business is such an expensive cluster f**k!


3 posted on 12/31/2010 3:23:33 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

“The same hypothetical couple retiring in 2011 will have paid $614,000 in Social Security taxes...”

I wanna see the math on that.


4 posted on 12/31/2010 3:28:03 PM PST by PLMerite (Fix the FR clock. It's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

What you individually pay never covers what you receive when you have a major illness in any insurance plan, private or not. Collectively, however, it would - that is, if your insurer invests it and doesn’t throw it away.

Think about it. A national mandatory insurance plan where you pay a certain percentage of your income every year - for benefits that you may or may not receive and which in many cases people with pension programs that provide insurance won’t ever receive or use (since Medicare asks you about your alternate insurance) - why shouldn’t you get more than you paid in if you need it? Because chances are you won’t need it, and that’s what insurance is all about.

A person who pays into any non-goverment program and has a catastrophic medical event (or even an average surgery-required medical incident, such as a mastectomy) is going to receive more than he or she has paid in. But most people will never use it or not need to use it for very much.

That’s the whole principal of the thing. Most people won’t have something catastrophic or chronic, the company invests the money you’re contributing when you’re healthy and is making big bucks (or should be), and the odds are on the side of the company.

This would be the case with Social Security and Medicare, had not our government been stealing the money for decades now.


6 posted on 12/31/2010 3:31:18 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
Upon retiring in 2011, they would have paid $114,000 in Medicare payroll taxes during their careers.

Any analysis over 10 or more years that ignores the time value of money is a joke.

$100 per month for 30 years at 6% = a total payment of $36,000 but has a future value of over $100,000. Comparing anything to that total of $36,000 is meaningless. The value of that payment stream is AT LEAST $100,000.

8 posted on 12/31/2010 3:36:28 PM PST by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
Should I bring up compound interest?

Or is everyone going to assume that they should get out exactly what they put in without considering that the government made use of the moneies paid to them and a reasonable rate of return should be expected?

9 posted on 12/31/2010 3:37:27 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (When all you have is bolt cutters & vodka everything looks like the lock on Wolf Blitzer's boathouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

And I am going to bring up the number of people who pay into Medicare and never get anything out of it.


10 posted on 12/31/2010 3:39:05 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (When all you have is bolt cutters & vodka everything looks like the lock on Wolf Blitzer's boathouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

This government has taxed the hell out of the working man to the point he’s damn lucky to have any savings at all.Never mind saving for medical care when you retire.

Where the hell do they think we’ll get the money?Governments at all levels confiscate close to 50% of your income and then they complain that your not investing enough to provide for your retirement.


13 posted on 12/31/2010 3:47:03 PM PST by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Please dear Lord....

THEY FORGOT TO MENTION THE EMPLOYER MATCH!!!!!!!!!

For every penny deducted from a paycheck, an employer somewhere matches it.

Such a very important concept.

Get the math straight then present the analysis.

That mythical $114,000 contributed to Medicare is REALLY $228,000!!!!!

This really matters, you think?


14 posted on 12/31/2010 3:49:26 PM PST by Fishtalk (Dance like nobody's watching; Sing like nobody's listening; Blog like nobody's reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

It burns me up when some lib talking heads start talking about the Tea Party and how we want to cut government but not in our own entitlement programs. That’s right. We feel like we have more to gripe about when our entitlements are cut because At LEAST WE PAID SOMETHING into the system. It isn’t fair to weigh welfare and Medicaid equally with Social Security and Medicare. The first group pays nothing and takes all. At least the last group pays state and federal taxes, property taxes, capital gains taxes, SS and Medicare taxes, ad infinitum. The payments may not cover 100% of expenses, but at least we have diligently paid what we owed.


15 posted on 12/31/2010 3:52:52 PM PST by REPANDPROUDOFIT (General, sir, it is perfectly ok to call me "ma'am"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
I read this before. I'm no financial whiz, but it seems funny they don't factor in the value of those funds if they had been privately invested.

I know that at 5% per anum, compound interest will double your money in 14 years. And double it again in 28 years. Am I right? So Medicare has actually made off like bandits with a lot more than that bare naked $114,000.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

17 posted on 12/31/2010 3:55:56 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (We've gone from teaching Latin in high school to teaching Remedial English in college. -- Sobran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

They’re using a certain number. My daughter and hubby each make that. They’re paying through the nose for someone NOW....their contribution for their future use....simply doesn’t exist FOR THEM.


18 posted on 12/31/2010 3:56:20 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Don’t retire, just die. That’s the message of the article.


25 posted on 12/31/2010 4:38:01 PM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Consider an average-wage, two-earner couple together earning $89,000 a year. Upon retiring in 2011, they would have paid $114,000 in Medicare payroll taxes during their careers.

_____

When these so-called journalists write this clap-trap they ought to have a smidgeon of financial training.

I am assuming the $114,000 paid in is correct. If those contributions had been invested at a modest rate of interest over 30 years or more, the $114,000 would be worth something like $500,000 or more today.,


26 posted on 12/31/2010 4:47:40 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

After reading the comments I would add that the authors of this analysis are writing to those Americans who believe they are getting money from Uncle Sam when they get a refund check from the IRS.

Our biggest problem is the increasing number of Americans who are brain dead.


29 posted on 12/31/2010 4:53:37 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
ummm - they keep right on paying after retirement - goes up every year - now $100 a month out of soc. sec, - then a yearly deductible and 20$ co-pay. In addition, unlike most insurance plans, office visits aren't covered.

Yes, this is less then many pay for their insurance - but factor in that these people paid in advance for 50 years before they could use it.

Then factor that not EVERYONE is going to be using those figures for medical treatment...tho’ everyone paid and pays in...and many died before reaching retirement or soon after - and they pre-paid 50 yrs.

It isn't retirees that are breaking the system. It's the embezzled funds - stolen and given to the druggie, alcoholics and ‘bi-polars and other young, perfectly healthy leaches who get a monthly check with NO deduction for medical on medicaid - and their coverage is FULL. No deductible, no co-pay, office visits and counseling totally covered. The vast majority of these mooches are perfectly able to work.

they choose not too - and no one is doing anything to weed out the able bodied slackers.

How about doing some cutting in these ranks before you come after those that worked and paid for 50 years ahead and now still paying a share?

39 posted on 12/31/2010 8:49:32 PM PST by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson